Motorola Edge 40 vs LG Q Stylo 4: A Deep Dive into Performance, Display, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Motorola Edge 40 is the clear winner. Its significantly faster Mediatek Dimensity 8020 chipset, coupled with a brighter, higher-quality display and faster charging, provides a dramatically improved user experience. However, the LG Q Stylo 4 remains a viable option for those on an extremely tight budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | LG Q Stylo 4 | Motorola Edge 40 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 20, 38, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018, June. Released 2018, June | 2023, May 04 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, May 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum frame, plastic back or eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 160 x 77.7 x 8.1 mm (6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 in) | 158.4 x 72 x 7.6 mm (6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 167 g or 171 g (5.89 oz) |
| Stylus | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.2 inches, 99.2 cm2 (~79.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | P-OLED, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM450 Snapdragon 450 (14 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 506 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 8.1 (Oreo), LG UX 7 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.4, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, PDAF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR10, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 720p | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Moto Ready For support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 68W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 3300 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4400 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Aurora Black | Nebula Green, Lunar Blue, Eclipse Black, Viva Magenta |
| Models | LM-Q710(FGN), LM-Q710.FGN, Q710AL, LML713DL, Q710PL | XT2303-2 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | € 202.03 / $ 419.99 / £ 199.00 / ₹ 29,999 |
| SAR | 1.12 W/kg (head) 1.22 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 98h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | 240 USD | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 688347 (v9) GeekBench: 3320 (v5.1), 3603 (v6) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
LG Q Stylo 4
- Extremely affordable price point
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Decent battery endurance (98h)
- Outdated Snapdragon 450 processor
- Slow 10W charging
- Display quality likely inferior to competitors
Motorola Edge 40
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 8020 chipset
- Bright and vibrant display (1043 nits)
- Fast 68W wired and 15W wireless charging
- Higher price compared to the LG Q Stylo 4
- May be overkill for basic users
- No expandable storage (assumed based on market segment)
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 boasts a significantly superior display, achieving a measured peak brightness of 1043 nits compared to the LG Q Stylo 4’s $240 display (price point only, no brightness data available). This difference translates to vastly improved visibility in direct sunlight. While the Q Stylo 4’s display price suggests a basic panel, the Edge 40’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) indicates a likely OLED or AMOLED technology, offering deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. The absence of refresh rate data for the Q Stylo 4 further emphasizes the Edge 40’s likely advantage in display smoothness.
Camera Comparison
Both devices list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but the specifics are lacking for the LG Q Stylo 4. The Motorola Edge 40 likely benefits from a more advanced image signal processor (ISP) integrated within the Dimensity 8020 chipset, enabling better image processing and potentially features like HDR video recording. Without sensor size or aperture data for either phone, it’s difficult to make a definitive statement, but the Edge 40’s overall hardware superiority suggests a more capable camera system. The Q Stylo 4 likely features a basic camera setup geared towards casual snapshots.
Performance
The performance gap between these devices is substantial. The Motorola Edge 40’s Mediatek Dimensity 8020, built on a 6nm process, features a powerful octa-core configuration (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) designed for demanding tasks. In contrast, the LG Q Stylo 4 relies on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (14nm) with its octa-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 CPU. The Dimensity 8020’s newer architecture and smaller fabrication node deliver significantly improved CPU and GPU performance, making the Edge 40 far more capable for gaming, video editing, and multitasking. The Q Stylo 4 will struggle with resource-intensive applications.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 98h, but this metric doesn't tell the whole story. The Motorola Edge 40’s 68W wired charging and 15W wireless charging capabilities are a massive advantage over the LG Q Stylo 4’s slow 10W wired charging. This means the Edge 40 can be rapidly topped up, minimizing downtime. While the Q Stylo 4’s endurance rating suggests similar battery life, the Edge 40’s faster charging mitigates any potential differences in actual usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the LG Q Stylo 4 if you need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media, and your budget is under $200. You prioritize affordability above all else. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 if you value performance for gaming and multitasking, a vibrant and bright display for media consumption, and fast charging capabilities, and are willing to spend more for a smoother, more enjoyable experience.