The LG K92 5G and Motorola G Pure represent opposite ends of the budget smartphone spectrum. The K92 5G, while an older model, offers the allure of 5G connectivity and a more powerful processor. The G Pure, on the other hand, prioritizes affordability and aims to deliver essential smartphone functionality at the lowest possible price. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing future-proofing and smoother performance, the LG K92 5G is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 690 5G chipset provides a significant performance advantage over the Motorola G Pure’s Helio G25, and Quick Charge 4.0 support is a substantial benefit. However, the G Pure remains a viable option for those on an extremely tight budget who only need basic smartphone features.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 25, 26, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 29. Released 2020, November 06 | 2021, October 07 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, October 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 166.4 x 77.2 x 8.4 mm (6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 in) | 167.4 x 75.6 x 8.8 mm (6.59 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202.4 g (7.13 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~80.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 560 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 560 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6350 Snapdragon 690 5G (8 nm) | Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619L | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm, AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06, 1.0µm | 5 MP, f/2.4, 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | Quick Charge 4.0 | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Titan Gray | Deep Indigo |
| Models | LMK920, LM-K920 | XT-2163-4, XT2163-4, XT2163-6, XT2163-1, XT2163-2 |
| Price | About 340 EUR | $ 63.99 / C$ 123.00 |
LG K92 5G
- 5G Connectivity for faster data speeds
- More powerful Snapdragon 690 processor
- Quick Charge 4.0 for rapid charging
- Likely higher price point
- May be discontinued or harder to find
Motorola G Pure
- Extremely affordable price
- Simple and easy-to-use interface
- Decent battery life for basic usage
- Slow 10W charging
- Less powerful Helio G25 processor
- Limited features and performance
Display Comparison
Display specifications are not provided in the context data, but given the price points, both devices likely feature LCD panels. The K92 5G, being a slightly higher-tier device, may have a higher resolution and potentially better color accuracy. However, the G Pure’s focus on cost reduction likely means a simpler display configuration. The absence of details prevents a definitive comparison of brightness nits or refresh rates.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the K92 5G’s positioning suggests a more capable camera system. The G Pure likely prioritizes cost savings, resulting in a simpler camera setup. The presence of a 5G modem in the K92 5G implies a more robust ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Snapdragon 690, potentially leading to better image processing and low-light performance. We can assume the K92 5G will offer a more versatile camera experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The LG K92 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G (8nm) is significantly more powerful than the Motorola G Pure’s MediaTek Helio G25 (12nm). The 8nm process node of the Snapdragon 690 translates to better power efficiency and thermal management, allowing for sustained performance during demanding tasks. The Snapdragon 690’s Kryo 560 cores (2x2.0 GHz Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Silver) offer a more sophisticated architecture compared to the Helio G25’s homogenous octa-core setup (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53). This architectural advantage means the K92 5G will handle multitasking, gaming, and app loading times with greater ease. The Helio G25, while capable of basic tasks, will struggle with more intensive applications.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified, but the K92 5G’s Quick Charge 4.0 support is a major advantage. The G Pure is limited to 10W wired charging, meaning significantly longer charge times. While the G Pure might have a larger battery capacity, the K92 5G’s faster charging will minimize downtime. The Snapdragon 690’s 8nm process also contributes to better power efficiency, potentially offsetting any capacity difference.
Buying Guide
Buy the LG K92 5G if you need 5G connectivity, plan to use demanding apps, or value faster charging speeds. It’s ideal for users who want a phone that will remain usable for longer. Buy the Motorola G Pure if you prioritize absolute affordability and only require basic smartphone functionality like calls, texts, and light social media use. It’s a good choice for first-time smartphone owners or as a reliable backup device.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the LG K92 5G’s 5G connectivity actually make a difference in my daily use?
5G’s benefits depend on network availability in your area. If you live in a city with robust 5G coverage, you’ll experience significantly faster download and upload speeds, especially for streaming and large file transfers. However, if 5G is limited, the difference may be minimal.
❓ Is the MediaTek Helio G25 in the Motorola G Pure powerful enough for casual gaming?
The Helio G25 can handle basic 2D games and less demanding 3D titles at lower settings. However, it will struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG or Call of Duty. Expect lower frame rates and potential lag during gameplay.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Motorola G Pure with its 10W charging?
With 10W charging, the Motorola G Pure will likely take over 3 hours to fully charge from 0% to 100%, potentially even longer depending on battery capacity. This is a significant drawback compared to the K92 5G’s Quick Charge 4.0.
