The LG K92 5G and LG K62 represent different approaches to the budget smartphone market. The K92 5G aims to deliver future-proof connectivity with its 5G capabilities, powered by a Snapdragon processor. Conversely, the K62 focuses on affordability, utilizing a MediaTek Helio P35 chipset. This comparison dissects the core differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the LG K92 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 690 chipset provides a significantly faster and more responsive experience, especially when utilizing 5G networks. While the K62 offers a lower price point, the performance trade-offs are substantial, making the K92 5G a worthwhile investment for those prioritizing speed and future-proofing.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 28, 38, 66 - North America |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40 - Brazil |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 29. Released 2020, November 06 | 2020, September 23. Released 2020, November 27 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 166.4 x 77.2 x 8.4 mm (6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 in) | 165 x 76.7 x 8.4 mm (6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202.4 g (7.13 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| | - | MIL-STD-810G compliant*
*does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~83.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 560 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 560 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6350 Snapdragon 690 5G (8 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619L | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06, 1.0µm | 28 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | Quick Charge 4.0 | - |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Titan Gray | White, Sky Blue, Red |
| Models | LMK920, LM-K920 | LMK525H, LMK525, LM-K525H, LM-K525 |
| Price | About 340 EUR | About 290 EUR |
LG K92 5G
- Significantly faster performance with Snapdragon 690
- 5G connectivity for future-proof networking
- Quick Charge 4.0 support for faster charging
- Potentially higher price point
- May have limited software update support (typical for LG)
LG K62
- More affordable price
- Decent for basic smartphone tasks
- Potentially longer battery life due to less demanding chipset
- Slow performance with Helio P35
- No 5G connectivity
- Limited gaming capabilities
Display Comparison
Detailed display specifications are unavailable, but considering the market positioning, both likely feature LCD panels. The K92 5G’s advantage lies in its potential for better color calibration due to the more powerful image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 690. The K62, with its Helio P35, may exhibit less accurate color reproduction. Bezels are likely comparable, given both target the budget segment. The lack of high refresh rate support on either device is typical for this price range.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it’s difficult to make precise comparisons. However, the Snapdragon 690’s ISP in the K92 5G provides a significant advantage in image processing. It can handle more complex algorithms for noise reduction, dynamic range optimization, and autofocus speed. While both phones likely feature multiple rear cameras, the K92 5G will likely produce sharper, more detailed images, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The K62’s Helio P35 ISP will struggle to keep up with the K92 5G’s processing capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The LG K92 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 (8nm) is a substantial upgrade over the LG K62’s MediaTek Helio P35 (12nm). The 8nm process node of the Snapdragon 690 translates to better power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling under sustained load. The Snapdragon 690’s Kryo 560 cores (2x2.0 GHz Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Silver) offer a more modern architecture and higher single-core performance compared to the Helio P35’s Cortex-A53 cores (4x2.3 GHz & 4x1.8 GHz). This means faster app launch times, smoother scrolling, and a more responsive overall experience on the K92 5G. The K92 5G also benefits from the Snapdragon’s superior GPU, enabling better gaming performance.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified, but the Snapdragon 690’s 8nm process contributes to better power efficiency. The K92 5G also supports Quick Charge 4.0, allowing for faster charging speeds compared to the K62, which likely lacks fast charging support. While the K62 might have a slightly larger battery capacity, the K92 5G’s efficiency and faster charging will likely result in a comparable, or even better, real-world battery experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the LG K92 5G if you need 5G connectivity, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience for demanding apps and occasional gaming. It’s ideal for users who want a phone that will remain relevant for longer. Buy the LG K62 if you prioritize absolute affordability and only require basic smartphone functionality – web browsing, social media, and light communication – and don't anticipate needing 5G.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the LG K92 5G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 690 in the K92 5G is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but likely at medium settings to maintain a stable frame rate. The Helio P35 in the K62 will struggle with PUBG, even at the lowest settings, resulting in a choppy and frustrating experience.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the LG K92 5G worth the extra cost if 5G isn't widely available in my area?
Even if 5G coverage is limited now, the K92 5G still benefits from the Snapdragon 690’s improved 4G LTE performance. Furthermore, investing in a 5G phone future-proofs your device for when 5G networks become more prevalent.
❓ How much of a performance difference will I notice between the Snapdragon 690 and Helio P35 in everyday tasks?
The difference will be very noticeable. The K92 5G will feel significantly snappier when opening apps, switching between tasks, and browsing the web. The K62 may exhibit lag and slowdowns, especially when multitasking.
