The LG K62 and Samsung Galaxy A14 represent compelling options in the ultra-budget smartphone space. While the K62 is an older model, it remains available and offers a baseline for comparison. The A14, with its potentially more modern chipset options, aims to deliver improved performance and features. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A14 is the better choice. Its Mediatek Helio G80 (or Exynos 850) offers a significant performance uplift over the LG K62’s Helio P35, translating to smoother multitasking and a more responsive user experience. While the K62 may be cheaper, the A14’s improved processing power justifies the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 28, 38, 66 - North America | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40 - Brazil | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 23. Released 2020, November 27 | 2023, February 28 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, March 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165 x 76.7 x 8.4 mm (6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 167.7 x 78 x 9.1 mm (6.60 x 3.07 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| | MIL-STD-810G compliant*
*does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~83.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~80.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version AOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version B |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769 Helio G80 (12 nm) - Version AExynos 850 (8 nm) - Version B |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.75", 0.64µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 28 MP | 13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1 or 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | White, Sky Blue, Red | Black, Dark Red, Silver, Green |
| Models | LMK525H, LMK525, LM-K525H, LM-K525 | SM-A145F, SM-A145F/DSN, SM-A145M, SM-A145M/DS, SM-A145P, SM-A145R |
| Price | About 290 EUR | € 85.76 / $ 147.60 / £ 79.95 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.46 W/kg (head) 1.37 W/kg (body) |
LG K62
- Potentially lower price point
- Compact size (likely)
- Functional for basic tasks
- Outdated Helio P35 chipset
- Limited performance for demanding apps
- Likely inferior camera quality
Samsung Galaxy A14
- More powerful Helio G80 or Exynos 850 chipset
- Smoother multitasking and app performance
- Potentially better camera quality
- 15W fast charging
- Slightly higher price
- Larger size may not suit all users
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both utilize 12nm chipsets, suggesting similar power constraints impacting display capabilities. While specific display specs (resolution, brightness) are missing for the K62, the A14’s display is likely a standard LCD panel. The focus here isn’t on visual fidelity, but rather basic usability. The A14’s larger screen size (typically 6.6 inches vs K62’s 6.2 inches) provides a more immersive viewing experience, even if the panel technology is basic.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely similar in real-world usage, given both phones target the budget segment. The LG K62’s camera specs are not readily available, but it’s reasonable to assume a basic setup. The Samsung Galaxy A14 typically features a 50MP main sensor, which, while not flagship-level, provides a decent level of detail in good lighting conditions. Both devices likely include lower-resolution auxiliary cameras (depth, macro) that offer limited utility. Image processing will be a key factor, and Samsung’s software generally provides more refined results than LG’s in this price bracket.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The LG K62’s Mediatek Helio P35, with its Cortex-A53 cores, is a relatively dated chipset. The Samsung Galaxy A14, however, offers two chipset variants: the Mediatek Helio G80 and the Exynos 850. The Helio G80, built on a 12nm process, features more powerful Cortex-A75 cores alongside A55 cores, offering a substantial CPU performance boost. The Exynos 850, fabricated on an 8nm process, further improves efficiency and performance. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive overall experience on the A14. The A14’s CPU architecture is demonstrably more modern and capable.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A14 includes 15W wired charging, a standard feature for this price point. Battery capacity is a critical factor, but specific numbers for the K62 are missing. However, given the less efficient Helio P35 chipset, the A14’s more efficient Helio G80 or Exynos 850 will likely deliver comparable or better battery life despite potentially similar battery capacities. The 15W charging on the A14 provides a reasonable recharge time for daily use.
Buying Guide
Buy the LG K62 if your primary need is a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media, and you are prioritizing the absolute lowest price. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A14 if you want a more capable device for everyday use, including moderate gaming, streaming, and multitasking, and are willing to spend a little more for a smoother experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A14’s Exynos 850 chip overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 850 is an 8nm chip, offering better thermal efficiency than the LG K62’s Helio P35. While it won’t deliver flagship-level gaming performance, it’s unlikely to overheat significantly during moderate gaming sessions. Expect some throttling after extended play, but it should remain playable.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either phone actually useful for taking detailed close-up photos?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras on budget phones offer limited utility. The low resolution results in images lacking detail and sharpness. They are more of a marketing feature than a genuinely useful camera component. Expect soft, often blurry, close-up shots.
❓ Can the Samsung Galaxy A14 handle popular games like PUBG Mobile at reasonable frame rates?
The Helio G80 (or Exynos 850) in the A14 can handle PUBG Mobile at medium settings with a stable frame rate. While you won’t achieve the highest graphical settings, the experience will be playable and enjoyable. The LG K62’s Helio P35 will struggle with PUBG Mobile, likely requiring very low settings and still experiencing significant frame drops.
❓ What type of storage does the Samsung Galaxy A14 use, and is it expandable?
The Samsung Galaxy A14 typically uses eMMC storage, which is common in this price range. It also includes a microSD card slot for expandable storage, allowing you to add up to 1TB of additional space. This is a significant advantage for users who store a lot of photos, videos, or apps.
