The LG K62 and LG Q52 present a curious case for smartphone shoppers. Both devices are positioned within the entry-level segment and, remarkably, utilize the exact same MediaTek Helio P35 chipset. This comparison aims to dissect any meaningful differences beyond branding, determining whether one offers a superior experience for the price-conscious consumer.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the LG Q52 emerges as the slightly better value. While performance is identical due to the shared Helio P35, the Q52 often benefits from more aggressive pricing, making it the more sensible choice for those prioritizing affordability without sacrificing core functionality.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 28, 38, 66 - North America | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40 - Brazil | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 23. Released 2020, November 27 | 2020, September 26. Released 2020, October 26 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 165 x 76.7 x 8.4 mm (6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 165 x 76.7 x 8.4 mm (6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| | MIL-STD-810G compliant*
*does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | MIL-STD-810G compliant*
*does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~83.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~83.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 28 MP | 13 MP, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | White, Sky Blue, Red | Silky White, Silky Red |
| Models | LMK525H, LMK525, LM-K525H, LM-K525 | LM-Q520N |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 240 EUR |
LG K62
- Identical performance to the Q52 due to the Helio P35 chipset.
- Potential for wider carrier availability.
- May be found at a discounted price in certain regions.
- No significant advantages over the Q52.
- Likely similar battery life and camera performance.
- May have less streamlined software.
LG Q52
- Identical performance to the K62 due to the Helio P35 chipset.
- Often available at a lower price point.
- Potentially cleaner software experience.
- No significant advantages over the K62.
- Likely similar battery life and camera performance.
- May have limited carrier availability.
Display Comparison
Both the LG K62 and Q52 feature 6.5-inch displays, but detailed specifications regarding panel type (IPS LCD is expected for both) and resolution (likely HD+) are not provided. Given the price point, neither is expected to deliver exceptional brightness or color accuracy. The absence of high refresh rate technology is standard for this segment. The user experience will likely be similar, with the display serving primarily for basic content consumption and app navigation. Differences in bezel size, if any, are likely minimal and won't significantly impact the overall viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are not detailed enough to draw significant distinctions. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, but the quality will be heavily dependent on sensor size and image processing algorithms. The Helio P35's ISP (Image Signal Processor) is relatively basic, so advanced features like HDR or night mode will likely be limited in effectiveness. Any differences in camera performance will likely stem from software tuning rather than hardware capabilities. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering minimal practical benefit due to the low resolution and lack of optical image stabilization.
Performance
The core of both devices is the MediaTek Helio P35 (MT6765), a 12nm chipset featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with four cores clocked at 2.3 GHz and four at 1.8 GHz. This means performance will be virtually identical across both phones. Expect adequate performance for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light app usage. However, demanding games or multitasking with numerous apps will likely result in noticeable slowdowns. The shared chipset also implies similar thermal limitations; sustained heavy workloads will likely lead to throttling to prevent overheating. RAM configurations are not specified, but will heavily influence multitasking capabilities.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, given the Helio P35's power efficiency and the target market, both are likely equipped with batteries in the 4000-5000 mAh range. Charging wattage is also unknown, but is expected to be relatively slow (likely 10W or 15W). Real-world battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns, but users can anticipate a full day of moderate use. The lack of fast charging technology means topping up the battery will require a significant amount of time.
Buying Guide
Buy the LG K62 if you find it significantly discounted and prioritize a potentially wider availability through specific carriers or retailers. Buy the LG Q52 if you prefer a cleaner, more streamlined software experience and are seeking the lowest possible price for a functional, everyday smartphone powered by the Helio P35.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio P35 struggle with popular apps like Facebook or WhatsApp?
The Helio P35 is capable of running apps like Facebook and WhatsApp without major issues, but expect some lag when switching between apps or loading complex content. It's designed for basic smartphone tasks, not intensive multitasking.
❓ Can I play games like PUBG Mobile on either the K62 or Q52?
While PUBG Mobile may be playable on the lowest graphics settings, the Helio P35 is not a gaming chipset. Expect low frame rates, significant lag, and potential overheating during extended gaming sessions. It's not recommended for serious mobile gaming.
❓ How does the software experience differ between the K62 and Q52?
LG's software experience is generally similar across its devices, but the Q52 often receives fewer carrier-imposed customizations, resulting in a cleaner and more streamlined user interface compared to the K62, which may be tailored for specific network operators.
