The LG K62 and K92 5G represent LG’s attempts to deliver affordable smartphones. However, a significant divergence in chipset choice creates a substantial performance gap. This comparison dissects the differences between the Mediatek Helio P35-powered K62 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G-equipped K92 5G, focusing on real-world implications for users.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and future-proofing, the LG K92 5G is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 690 5G chipset offers a significant performance uplift over the K62’s Helio P35, alongside the benefit of 5G connectivity and faster charging. While the K62 remains a viable option for basic tasks, the K92 5G provides a smoother, more capable experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 28, 38, 66 - North America | LTE |
| 5G bands | - | SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40 - Brazil | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 23. Released 2020, November 27 | 2020, September 29. Released 2020, November 06 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 165 x 76.7 x 8.4 mm (6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 166.4 x 77.2 x 8.4 mm (6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 202.4 g (7.13 oz) |
| | MIL-STD-810G compliant*
*does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~83.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 560 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 560 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6350 Snapdragon 690 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 619L |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 28 MP | 16 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06, 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | Quick Charge 4.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | White, Sky Blue, Red | Titan Gray |
| Models | LMK525H, LMK525, LM-K525H, LM-K525 | LMK920, LM-K920 |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 340 EUR |
LG K62
- Lower price point makes it accessible.
- Sufficient for basic smartphone tasks.
- Likely longer battery life due to less powerful chipset (in light usage).
- Significantly slower performance compared to the K92 5G.
- No 5G connectivity.
- Slower charging speeds.
LG K92 5G
- Faster and more responsive performance thanks to the Snapdragon 690 5G.
- 5G connectivity for future network compatibility.
- Quick Charge 4.0 support for faster charging.
- Higher price compared to the K62.
- Potentially slightly shorter battery life under heavy load.
Display Comparison
Neither LG provides detailed display specifications beyond resolution. However, the K92 5G’s more powerful chipset suggests a potentially better display driver, leading to more accurate color reproduction and smoother animations. Both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, common in this price bracket. The absence of high refresh rate technology on either device means users won't experience the fluidity found on more premium phones.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the K92 5G’s more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Snapdragon 690 chipset will likely result in better image processing, particularly in low-light conditions. The K62’s Helio P35 ISP is less capable, potentially leading to softer images and more noise. The presence of a more advanced chipset in the K92 5G also suggests better support for computational photography features.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The LG K92 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, built on an 8nm process, is a substantial upgrade over the K62’s 12nm Mediatek Helio P35. The Snapdragon 690 features Kryo 560 cores – a mix of performance (Gold) and efficiency (Silver) – offering a more balanced and powerful CPU configuration (2x2.0 GHz Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Silver) compared to the K62’s homogenous octa-core Cortex-A53 setup (4x2.3 GHz & 4x1.8 GHz). This translates to significantly faster app launch times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance on the K92 5G. The 8nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
While battery capacity isn’t specified, the K92 5G benefits from Quick Charge 4.0 support, allowing for significantly faster charging speeds compared to the K62, which likely relies on standard charging. This means less downtime and more time using the device. The Snapdragon 690’s 8nm process also contributes to improved power efficiency, potentially offsetting any difference in battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the LG K62 if you need a basic smartphone for essential tasks like calls, texts, and light social media browsing, and are on a very tight budget. Its Helio P35 chipset is sufficient for these limited workloads. Buy the LG K92 5G if you prioritize a smoother user experience, faster app loading times, 5G connectivity for future network compatibility, and the ability to handle more demanding applications like mobile gaming or video editing.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 690 in the K92 5G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
Yes, the Snapdragon 690 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. While it won't deliver a flagship gaming experience, it provides a significantly smoother and more enjoyable gaming experience compared to the Helio P35 in the K62, which would struggle with consistent performance.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the K92 5G worth the extra cost if 5G isn't widely available in my area yet?
Even if 5G isn't currently available, the K92 5G’s 5G modem provides future-proofing. As 5G networks expand, you’ll be ready to take advantage of faster speeds without needing to upgrade your phone. Furthermore, the Snapdragon 690 offers improved 4G LTE performance compared to the Helio P35, providing benefits even on existing networks.
❓ Does the LG K62 suffer from significant performance throttling under sustained load?
The Helio P35, built on a 12nm process, is prone to thermal throttling. This means that during prolonged gaming sessions or demanding tasks, the processor will reduce its clock speed to prevent overheating, resulting in noticeable performance drops. The K92 5G’s 8nm Snapdragon 690 is much more efficient and less susceptible to throttling.
