LG K52 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T: A Detailed Comparison of Budget Smartphones
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T is the clear winner. Its Mediatek Dimensity 800U chipset delivers significantly faster performance than the LG K52’s Helio P35, making it better suited for gaming, multitasking, and future-proofing. While battery life is comparable, the Redmi Note 9T’s faster charging is a bonus.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | LG K52 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 28, 38, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - Australia | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 23. Released 2020, November 23 | 2021, January 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, January 18 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165 x 76.7 x 8.4 mm (6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 161.2 x 77.3 x 9.1 mm (6.35 x 3.04 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| MIL-STD-810G compliant* *does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | Water-repellent coating | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~83.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 10, MIUI 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 - 64GB UFS 2.2 - 128GB | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 13 MP, f/2.3, 29mm (standard), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n or Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired, 33% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | White, Blue, Red | Nightfall Black, Daybreak Purple |
| Models | LMK520, LM-K520, LMK520E, LM-K520E, LMK520Y, LM-K520Y, LMK520H, LM-K520H | M2007J22G, J22 |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 130 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.07 W/kg (head) 1.05 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.94 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 118h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1226:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.3 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 288732 (v8) GeekBench: 1775 (v5.1) |
LG K52
- Potentially lower price point
- Simple and easy-to-use interface
- Acceptable battery life
- Significantly weaker performance
- Outdated chipset
- Limited future-proofing
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T
- Much faster performance with Dimensity 800U
- Faster 18W charging
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- May be slightly more expensive
- Software experience can be cluttered (MIUI)
- Contrast ratio is average
Display Comparison
Both phones feature similar contrast ratios at 1226:1, suggesting comparable image depth. However, the Redmi Note 9T boasts a measured peak brightness of 471 nits, which will provide a noticeably more visible display outdoors compared to the LG K52, whose brightness is not specified. The lack of information on the K52’s panel type makes it difficult to assess color accuracy, but the Redmi Note 9T’s display, while not exceptional, is adequate for everyday use.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the Redmi Note 9T’s overall focus on performance, it’s reasonable to assume it benefits from a more advanced image signal processor (ISP) within the Dimensity 800U, potentially leading to better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The LG K52 likely relies on more basic image processing.
Performance
The performance disparity is the most significant difference between these two devices. The Redmi Note 9T’s Mediatek Dimensity 800U, built on a 7nm process, features a more modern CPU architecture – two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4GHz alongside six Cortex-A55 cores – compared to the LG K52’s Helio P35 (12nm) with its four Cortex-A53 cores at 2.3GHz and four at 1.8GHz. This translates to a substantial performance advantage for the Redmi Note 9T in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. The Dimensity 800U also includes a more capable GPU, further widening the gap. The Redmi Note 9T will handle demanding apps and multitasking with ease, while the K52 may struggle.
Battery Life
Both the LG K52 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T achieve an endurance rating of 118 hours, indicating similar overall battery life under typical usage. However, the Redmi Note 9T offers 18W wired charging, capable of adding 33% charge in 30 minutes, a significant advantage over the LG K52, whose charging speed is not specified. This faster charging capability makes the Redmi Note 9T more convenient for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the LG K52 if you prioritize a simple, reliable smartphone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media use, and are on a very tight budget. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T if you want a phone capable of handling more demanding applications, enjoy mobile gaming, or value faster charging and a more responsive user experience.