LG K52 vs. Motorola Moto G Power (2021): A Detailed Performance and Battery Life Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Motorola Moto G Power (2021) is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 662 chipset, built on an 11nm process, offers noticeably better performance and efficiency compared to the LG K52’s 12nm Helio P35. While the K52 may be slightly cheaper, the G Power’s improved user experience justifies the small price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | LG K52 | Motorola Moto G Power (2021) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 28, 38, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 25, 26, 29, 30, 38, 41, 66, 71 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - Australia | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 23. Released 2020, November 23 | 2021, January 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, January 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165 x 76.7 x 8.4 mm (6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 165.3 x 75.9 x 9.5 mm (6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 206.5 g (7.30 oz) |
| MIL-STD-810G compliant* *does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | Water-repellent coating | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~83.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n or Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | White, Blue, Red | Flash Gray, Polar Silver |
| Models | LMK520, LM-K520, LMK520E, LM-K520E, LMK520Y, LM-K520Y, LMK520H, LM-K520H | - |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 60 EUR |
LG K52
- Potentially lower price point
- May offer a slightly more compact form factor
- Basic functionality for essential tasks
- Less powerful processor
- Lower power efficiency
- Likely slower app loading times
Motorola Moto G Power (2021)
- More powerful and efficient Snapdragon 662
- Better multitasking performance
- Improved gaming experience
- 15W fast charging
- May be slightly more expensive
- Potentially larger size
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, a common cost-saving measure in this segment. However, details like peak brightness and color accuracy are unavailable. The focus here is on the internal hardware, as display quality is unlikely to be a deciding factor. Bezels are expected to be relatively substantial on both models, typical for their price point.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct camera comparison is difficult. However, it’s safe to assume both phones feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. The Moto G Power likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP), which generally offers superior image processing capabilities compared to MediaTek’s ISP in the Helio P35. The presence of a dedicated ISP on the Snapdragon 662 allows for faster image capture and potentially better low-light performance. The LG K52’s camera system is likely to be more basic, relying heavily on software processing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Moto G Power (2021) features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, fabricated on an 11nm process. This translates to better power efficiency and sustained performance compared to the LG K52’s MediaTek Helio P35 (12nm). While both are octa-core CPUs, the Snapdragon 662 utilizes Qualcomm’s Kryo 260 cores – a more modern architecture than the Cortex-A53 cores found in the Helio P35. This architectural advantage means the G Power will handle multitasking and demanding apps with greater ease. The Snapdragon 662’s GPU will also provide a smoother gaming experience, even if not at high settings.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G Power (2021) is named appropriately. While the exact battery capacity isn’t specified, Motorola is known for prioritizing battery life in this series. The Snapdragon 662’s 11nm process contributes to improved power efficiency, allowing the G Power to extract more usage from its battery. The inclusion of 15W wired charging is a welcome addition, offering a reasonable charging speed. The LG K52’s Helio P35, being less efficient, will likely result in shorter battery life, despite potentially having a similar capacity. The difference in chipset efficiency will be noticeable in daily use.
Buying Guide
Buy the LG K52 if your primary need is a very basic smartphone for essential tasks like calls, texts, and light social media, and you are operating on an extremely tight budget. Buy the Motorola Moto G Power (2021) if you prioritize longer battery life, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience, even if it means spending a little more upfront. The G Power is ideal for users who frequently stream video, play mobile games, or rely heavily on their phone throughout the day.