The LG K41S and Motorola Moto G Power (2021) represent two distinct approaches to the budget smartphone market. The K41S, while older, offers a glimpse into LG’s former strategy, while the Moto G Power prioritizes long-lasting battery life and a more modern chipset. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which device delivers the best experience for the price-conscious consumer.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Moto G Power (2021) is the superior choice. Its Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset, built on an 11nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the LG K41S’s MediaTek Helio P22, translating to smoother multitasking and a more responsive user experience. While the K41S may be cheaper, the G Power’s efficiency and 15W charging offer better long-term value.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 38 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 25, 26, 29, 30, 38, 41, 66, 71 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, February 18. Released 2020, April 27 | 2021, January 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, January 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.8 x 76.5 x 8.3 mm (6.53 x 3.01 x 0.33 in) | 165.3 x 75.9 x 9.5 mm (6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 191.7 g (6.77 oz) | 206.5 g (7.30 oz) |
| | MIL-STD-810G compliant*
*does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Scratch-resistant glass | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~268 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~81.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 13 MP, f/2.0, 28mm (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Titanium, Black, White | Flash Gray, Polar Silver |
| Models | LMK410EMW, LM-K410EMW, LM-K410 | - |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 60 EUR |
LG K41S
- Potentially lower upfront cost.
- Acceptable for basic smartphone tasks.
- May have a more compact form factor (unconfirmed).
- Significantly weaker performance.
- Less efficient chipset leads to shorter battery life.
- Likely slower app loading and multitasking.
Motorola Moto G Power (2021)
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 662.
- More efficient chipset for longer battery life.
- 15W fast charging for reduced downtime.
- May be slightly more expensive.
- Potentially larger and heavier than the K41S.
- Software updates may be limited.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, common in this price bracket. However, the lack of detailed display specs for the K41S makes a direct comparison difficult. The Moto G Power’s display benefits from the more efficient chipset, potentially allowing for slightly better brightness control. The K41S’s older chipset may struggle to efficiently drive a high-resolution or particularly bright display, impacting viewing experience in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications beyond the presence of cameras, a precise comparison is challenging. However, the Moto G Power’s more powerful chipset allows for more sophisticated image processing. The K41S’s Helio P22 will likely struggle with complex algorithms, resulting in less detailed and potentially noisier images, especially in low-light conditions. It’s reasonable to assume the Moto G Power offers a more consistent and higher-quality camera experience, even if the sensor resolution is similar.
Performance
The Motorola Moto G Power (2021) holds a clear advantage in performance. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, fabricated on an 11nm process, is significantly more efficient and powerful than the LG K41S’s MediaTek Helio P22 (12nm). The Snapdragon 662’s octa-core configuration, with a mix of 2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold and 1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver cores, allows for better task prioritization and smoother multitasking. The Helio P22’s all-Cortex-A53 core design, while octa-core, lacks the performance headroom for demanding applications. This translates to noticeable lag and slower app loading times on the K41S.
Battery Life
The Moto G Power (2021) is named appropriately, prioritizing battery life. While the exact battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the Snapdragon 662’s 11nm process is more power-efficient than the Helio P22’s 12nm process. This efficiency, combined with the 15W wired charging on the Moto G Power, provides a significant advantage. The K41S likely offers acceptable battery life for basic use, but will require more frequent charging and may struggle to last a full day with moderate usage. The 15W charging on the Moto G Power also reduces downtime compared to potentially slower charging on the K41S.
Buying Guide
Buy the LG K41S if you absolutely need the lowest possible upfront cost and are primarily focused on basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media. Its Helio P22 chipset is sufficient for these limited workloads. Buy the Motorola Moto G Power (2021) if you prioritize a smoother, more responsive experience, longer battery life, and the ability to handle more demanding apps and occasional gaming. The Snapdragon 662 offers a significant performance boost and the 15W charging is a welcome addition.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Moto G Power (2021) struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile?
While the Snapdragon 662 isn't a gaming powerhouse, it's capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. Expect some occasional stuttering, but it's a far more playable experience than the Helio P22-powered K41S, which would likely struggle even at the lowest settings.
❓ How does the efficiency of the Snapdragon 662 impact daily usage on the Moto G Power?
The Snapdragon 662’s 11nm process significantly improves battery life compared to the K41S’s 12nm Helio P22. This means you can expect a full day of moderate use on the Moto G Power, even with features like location services and background app refresh enabled, whereas the K41S may require a mid-day charge.
❓ Is the LG K41S a good option for someone who primarily uses their phone for calls and texts?
Yes, the LG K41S is adequate for basic communication tasks. Its Helio P22 chipset is sufficient for making calls, sending texts, and using simple apps. However, if you anticipate using your phone for anything beyond these basic functions, the Moto G Power (2021) offers a much more enjoyable experience.