The LG K41S and Motorola Moto E7 represent the lower end of the smartphone market, targeting users prioritizing affordability. Both devices utilize MediaTek Helio chipsets, but subtle differences in architecture and features can significantly impact the user experience. This comparison dissects these nuances to determine which phone delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Moto E7 offers a slight edge due to its Helio G25 chipset, which incorporates a more efficient CPU cluster configuration. While both phones share a similar price point, the E7’s 10W charging is a welcome addition, making it the better choice for everyday use.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - Europe, Asia |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 38 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Asia |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, February 18. Released 2020, April 27 | 2020, November 24. Released 2020, December 09 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.8 x 76.5 x 8.3 mm (6.53 x 3.01 x 0.33 in) | 164.9 x 75.7 x 8.9 mm (6.49 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 191.7 g (6.77 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| | MIL-STD-810G compliant*
*does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Scratch-resistant glass | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~268 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~81.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.8 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro) |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 13 MP, f/2.0, 28mm (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Titanium, Black, White | Mineral Gray, Aqua Blue, Satin Coral |
| Models | LMK410EMW, LM-K410EMW, LM-K410 | - |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 110 EUR |
LG K41S
- Potentially wider software update availability (region dependent)
- Simple and straightforward user interface
- May be available through more carriers
- Less efficient processor architecture
- Likely slower charging speeds
- Potentially lower graphics performance
Motorola Moto E7
- More efficient processor with big.LITTLE architecture
- 10W wired charging support
- Slightly improved GPU performance
- Motorola’s software update track record can be inconsistent
- May have limited carrier availability
- Build quality may feel less premium
Display Comparison
Neither the LG K41S nor the Motorola Moto E7 are known for exceptional displays. Both likely feature LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. Specifics like resolution and brightness are not provided, but we can assume they are adequate for basic tasks. The absence of high refresh rates or advanced panel technologies like LTPO is expected. Bezels are likely to be noticeable on both devices, contributing to a less immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance on both devices will be modest. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make definitive claims. However, the inclusion of a dedicated 'G' series chipset in the Moto E7 suggests a slightly improved image signal processor (ISP), potentially leading to better image processing and noise reduction. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both phones suggests these are largely marketing features with limited practical utility. Expect acceptable results in well-lit conditions, but struggles in low light.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The LG K41S utilizes the MediaTek Helio P22, featuring eight Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. The Moto E7, however, employs the Helio G25. While also based on eight cores, the G25 utilizes a big.LITTLE architecture with four Cortex-A53 cores at 2.0 GHz and *four* Cortex-A53 cores at 1.5 GHz. This configuration allows the G25 to dynamically allocate tasks to the more efficient 1.5 GHz cores for lighter workloads, potentially improving battery life. The G25 also includes a slightly more capable GPU, offering a marginal improvement in graphics performance. Both phones likely feature limited RAM, impacting multitasking capabilities.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device, but both likely house batteries in the 3000-4000 mAh range, typical for budget smartphones. The Moto E7 gains a significant advantage with its 10W wired charging support. The LG K41S’s charging speed is unknown, but it’s likely slower, meaning longer charge times. The Helio G25’s more efficient CPU architecture in the Moto E7 may also contribute to slightly better battery life during typical usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the LG K41S if you prioritize a potentially wider availability of software updates (depending on region and LG’s support lifecycle) and are comfortable with a slightly less optimized processor. Buy the Motorola Moto E7 if you prefer a more balanced processor configuration geared towards sustained performance and benefit from the convenience of 10W wired charging, making it ideal for users who frequently top up their battery throughout the day.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Motorola Moto E7 handle basic mobile games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Helio G25 in the Moto E7 can run these games, but expect to play at the lowest graphics settings and potentially experience frame rate drops during intense moments. The GPU is not powerful enough for a smooth, high-fidelity gaming experience.
❓ How does the software experience differ between the LG K41S and the Motorola Moto E7?
The LG K41S likely runs LG’s UX skin on top of Android, which can be feature-rich but also includes pre-installed bloatware. The Moto E7 offers a near-stock Android experience with minimal bloatware, providing a cleaner and faster interface. Motorola’s software updates, however, can be less frequent than LG’s, depending on the region.
❓ Is the difference in processor performance between the Helio P22 and Helio G25 noticeable in everyday tasks?
For basic tasks like browsing, social media, and messaging, the difference will be minimal. However, the Helio G25’s more efficient architecture will result in smoother multitasking and quicker app loading times, especially when switching between multiple applications.
