LG K22 vs. Sony Xperia 5 III: A Tale of Two Smartphones
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Sony Xperia 5 III utterly dominates the LG K22 in almost every category. Its powerful Snapdragon 888, stunning display, and exceptional camera make it a clear winner, though at a significantly higher price. The K22 offers basic functionality at a low cost.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | LG K22 | Sony Xperia 5 III |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - USA |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - USA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40 - Brazil | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Asia | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 12. Released 2020, September 12 | 2021, April 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, October 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 155.7 x 75.4 x 8.4 mm (6.13 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) | 157 x 68 x 8.2 mm (6.18 x 2.68 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 169.5 g (6.00 oz) | 168 g (5.93 oz) |
| MIL-STD-810G compliant* *does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | IP65/IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~271 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~449 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.2 inches, 95.9 cm2 (~81.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 86.9 cm2 (~81.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR BT.2020 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm QM215 Snapdragon 215 (28 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 308 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | UFS 3.X | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, 27mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR, eye tracking |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4", 1.12µm |
| Triple | - | 12 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.7", 1.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.3, 70mm (telephoto), f/2.8, 105mm (telephoto), 1/2.9", dual pixel PDAF, 3x/4.4x optical zoom, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 124˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.6", dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/25/30/60/120fps HDR, 1080p@30/60/120fps; 5-axis gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, 24mm (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 5-axis gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio Dynamic vibration system | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio (market/operator dependent) | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, video output |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| - | Native Sony Alpha camera support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | Wired, PD, 50% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 3000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Titan, Blue | Black, Green, Pink |
| Models | LMK200Z, LMK200E, LMK200B, LM-K200 | XQBQ62/G, XQBQ52G.UKCX, XQBQ52B.UKCX, XQ-BQ52, XQ-BQ72, XQ-BQ42, XQ-BQ62, SO-53B |
| Price | About 140 EUR | € 431.90 / £ 199.99 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 100h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.7 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 708394 (v9) GeekBench: 3549 (v5.1) GFXBench: 53fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
LG K22
- Extremely affordable
- Simple and easy to use
- Decent battery life for light use
- Slow performance
- Mediocre camera
- Low-resolution display
- Outdated chipset
Sony Xperia 5 III
- Exceptional performance
- Outstanding camera
- Vibrant OLED display
- Fast charging
- Premium build quality
- Expensive
- Software updates can be slow
- Design can be polarizing
Display Comparison
The Xperia 5 III boasts a vibrant OLED display with a measured 590 nits brightness and an infinite contrast ratio, offering exceptional color accuracy and deep blacks. The LG K22's LCD display is adequate for its price point but lacks the punch and clarity of the Xperia 5 III. Viewing angles and color reproduction are noticeably inferior.
Camera Comparison
The Xperia 5 III's camera system is a standout feature, offering excellent image quality, video recording capabilities, and a range of creative options. The LG K22's camera is functional but produces mediocre results, especially in low light. The Xperia 5 III's processing and sensor technology are far superior.
Performance
The Snapdragon 888 in the Xperia 5 III provides blazing-fast performance, easily handling demanding games and multitasking. The K22's Snapdragon 215 struggles with anything beyond basic tasks, resulting in noticeable lag and slow app loading times. The difference is night and day.
Battery Life
Both phones are reported to have endurance ratings of 100 hours, but the Xperia 5 III's more efficient chipset and optimized software likely translate to better real-world battery life despite its more demanding usage. The K22's smaller battery may struggle to keep up with heavier use.
Buying Guide
The LG K22 is for users on a tight budget who need a simple phone for calls, texts, and basic apps. The Sony Xperia 5 III is for photography enthusiasts, gamers, and anyone who demands top-tier performance and a premium experience.