Looking for an affordable smartphone without breaking the bank? The LG K22 and Samsung Galaxy A04e are both contenders in the budget phone arena. But which one offers the best bang for your buck? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A04e takes the win thanks to its significantly faster processor, more modern chipset, and generally improved performance. While the LG K22 is a decent option, the A04e provides a smoother user experience and better future-proofing.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40 - Brazil | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 12. Released 2020, September 12 | 2022, October 21 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, November 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 155.7 x 75.4 x 8.4 mm (6.13 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 169.5 g (6.00 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| | MIL-STD-810G compliant*
*does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~271 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.2 inches, 95.9 cm2 (~81.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm QM215 Snapdragon 215 (28 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 308 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 12, One UI Core 4.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, 27mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro) | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash |
| Single | - | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, 24mm (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio (market/operator dependent) | Unspecified |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Po 3000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Titan, Blue | Black, Copper, Light Blue |
| Models | LMK200Z, LMK200E, LMK200B, LM-K200 | SM-A042F, SM-A042F/DS, SM-A042M, SM-A042M/DS |
| Price | About 140 EUR | ₹ 7,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.29 W/kg (head) 1.11 W/kg (body) |
LG K22
- Simple and easy to use
- Familiar LG interface
- Decent battery life
- Outdated chipset
- Slow performance
- Basic camera
Samsung Galaxy A04e
- Faster processor
- More modern chipset
- Better camera
- Samsung's One UI
- Plastic build
- Basic display
- Limited storage options
Display Comparison
Both phones feature basic LCD displays, likely around 6.5 inches. The A04e may offer slightly better color accuracy and brightness due to its newer chipset and potentially more advanced display panel. Resolution is likely to be HD+ on both, so don't expect stunning visuals.
Camera Comparison
The A04e likely has a more versatile camera setup, potentially including a higher resolution main sensor and a depth sensor for portrait mode. The LG K22's camera is likely adequate for basic snapshots, but the A04e should offer better image quality, especially in low light.
Performance
This is where the A04e shines. Its Mediatek Helio P35 chipset with an octa-core processor significantly outperforms the LG K22's Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 with a quad-core processor. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and a more responsive overall experience on the A04e.
Battery Life
Both phones likely feature batteries in the 5000mAh range, offering all-day battery life for moderate users. However, the A04e's more efficient chipset could translate to slightly better battery endurance.
Buying Guide
The LG K22 is a good choice for users prioritizing simplicity and a familiar LG interface on a very tight budget. The Samsung Galaxy A04e is ideal for those seeking better performance, a more modern chipset, and a slightly more premium feel, even within the budget category.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Samsung Galaxy A04e is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful processor and graphics capabilities.
❓ Does the LG K22 receive software updates?
LG has largely exited the smartphone market, so software updates for the K22 are likely to be limited or non-existent.
❓ Which phone has better call quality?
Both phones should offer acceptable call quality, but Samsung's generally better hardware and software optimization might give the A04e a slight edge.
