LG G8X ThinQ vs Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite: A Detailed Comparison of Two Snapdragon 855 Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite emerges as the slightly better choice. While both phones share the same Snapdragon 855 chipset, the S10 Lite’s significantly brighter display (705 nits vs 603 nits) and substantially faster 45W charging provide a more modern and convenient user experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | LG G8X ThinQ | Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat20 1960/75 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66 - USA | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, September 06. Released 2019, November 01 | 2020, January 03 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, February 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3+), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 159.3 x 75.8 x 8.4 mm (6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 162.5 x 75.6 x 8.1 mm (6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) MIL-STD-810G compliant* *does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3+ |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.8 cm2 (~87.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, HDR10 | Super AMOLED Plus, HDR10+ |
| Always-on display | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 12 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual-SIM model | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 12 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 9mm (ultrawide), 1.0µm | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 3.15 MP, AF | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, Super Steady OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 24-bit/192kHz stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio 24-bit/192kHz audio recording Tuned by Meridian Audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Browser | HTML, Adobe Flash | - |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | ANT+ | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 21W wired, PD, QC3 9W wireless | 45W wired |
| Talk time | Up to 12 h (multimedia) | - |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | New Aurora Black | Prism White, Prism Black, Prism Blue |
| Models | LMG850EMW, LM-G850, 901LG, LM-G850N | SM-G770F, SM-G770F/DS, SM-G770F/DSM, SM-G770U1 |
| Price | About 560 EUR | About 380 EUR |
| SAR | 1.12 W/kg (body) | 0.69 W/kg (head) 0.93 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.90 W/kg (head) | 0.49 W/kg (head) 1.52 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -93.2dB / Crosstalk -93.4dB | Noise -93.7dB / Crosstalk -94.7dB |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 111h | Endurance rating 110h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -24.9 LUFS (Very good) | -27.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 339726 (v7), 411980 (v8) GeekBench: 11251 (v4.4), 2870 (v5.1) GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 370751 (v7), 459497 (v8) GeekBench: 11151 (v4.4), 2732 (v5.1) GFXBench: 56fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
LG G8X ThinQ
- Slightly longer endurance rating (111h)
- Wireless charging support (9W)
- Potential for lower price (depending on market)
- Dimmer display (603 nits)
- Slower wired charging (21W)
- Less refined image processing
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
- Brighter display (705 nits)
- Significantly faster charging (45W)
- Generally better image processing
- No wireless charging
- Similar endurance rating to G8X
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite boasts a clear advantage in display brightness, achieving a measured 705 nits compared to the LG G8X ThinQ’s 603 nits. This 102-nit difference translates to significantly better visibility under direct sunlight. Both displays share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting similar black levels and overall image quality. However, the brightness gap is a tangible benefit for outdoor users. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, Samsung’s calibration and panel technology generally deliver more vibrant colors and wider viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed specifications are limited in the provided data. Both are described as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, Samsung’s image processing algorithms are generally more saturated and contrast-rich, appealing to users who prefer vibrant photos. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) makes it impossible to assess low-light performance differences. It's safe to assume both phones offer a versatile camera experience, but the S10 Lite’s brand reputation suggests a slight edge in overall image quality.
Performance
Both the LG G8X ThinQ and Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite are powered by the Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) chipset, featuring an identical octa-core CPU configuration. This means raw processing power will be virtually indistinguishable between the two devices in everyday tasks and most gaming scenarios. The performance will be limited by thermal throttling, and while neither phone is known for exceptional cooling, the S10 Lite’s slightly more refined thermal management (based on user reports) may offer a marginal advantage during sustained heavy loads. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR4X RAM, as LPDDR5 was not widespread at their launch.
Battery Life
The LG G8X ThinQ and Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite exhibit remarkably similar battery endurance, both achieving a rating of 110-111 hours. However, the charging capabilities are where a significant difference emerges. The S10 Lite supports 45W wired charging, allowing for a much faster 0-100% charge time compared to the G8X ThinQ’s 21W charging. The G8X ThinQ also offers 9W wireless charging, a feature absent on the S10 Lite. While the battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the S10 Lite provides a more convenient experience for users who frequently need to quickly replenish their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the LG G8X ThinQ if you prioritize endurance and are comfortable with a slightly dimmer screen. Its 111-hour endurance rating, while similar to the S10 Lite, might appeal to those who frequently find themselves away from a charger. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite if you value a brighter, more vibrant display for outdoor visibility and the convenience of incredibly fast 45W charging, making it ideal for power users who need to top up quickly.