LG G8X ThinQ vs. Samsung Galaxy A54: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and potential for future software customization, the LG G8X ThinQ offers a significant edge. However, the Samsung Galaxy A54 wins for those seeking a longer-lasting battery, brighter display, and a more modern software experience with guaranteed updates.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | LG G8X ThinQ | Samsung Galaxy A54 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat20 1960/75 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66 - USA | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, September 06. Released 2019, November 01 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.3 x 75.8 x 8.4 mm (6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) MIL-STD-810G compliant* *does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, HDR10 | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Always-on display | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 12 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual-SIM model | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 12 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 9mm (ultrawide), 1.0µm | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 3.15 MP, AF | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 24-bit/192kHz stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio 24-bit/192kHz audio recording Tuned by Meridian Audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Browser | HTML, Adobe Flash | - |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 21W wired, PD, QC3 9W wireless | 25W wired |
| Talk time | Up to 12 h (multimedia) | - |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | New Aurora Black | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | LMG850EMW, LM-G850, 901LG, LM-G850N | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 560 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | 1.12 W/kg (body) | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.90 W/kg (head) | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -93.2dB / Crosstalk -93.4dB | - |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 111h | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -24.9 LUFS (Very good) | -26.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 339726 (v7), 411980 (v8) GeekBench: 11251 (v4.4), 2870 (v5.1) GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 506678 (v9) GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
LG G8X ThinQ
- More powerful processor for demanding tasks
- Potential for custom ROMs and advanced tweaking
- Faster wired and wireless charging speeds
- Older model with potentially limited software support
- Significantly dimmer display
- Lower battery endurance
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Longer battery life and better efficiency
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Guaranteed software updates from Samsung
- Less powerful processor compared to the Snapdragon 855
- Slower charging speeds
- Samsung’s One UI can be resource intensive
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 980 nits compared to the LG G8X ThinQ’s 603 nits. This translates to superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. Both displays share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting deep blacks, but the A54’s higher brightness provides a more dynamic and vibrant image. While both are excellent, the A54’s panel is demonstrably better for outdoor use and overall visual pop.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information is limited. The focus should be on image processing. Samsung typically prioritizes vibrant, saturated colors, while LG historically aimed for more natural tones. Without detailed sensor specs, it’s difficult to declare a clear winner. However, the A54’s newer image signal processor (ISP) likely offers improved noise reduction and dynamic range in challenging lighting conditions. The presence of OIS on the A54 is a likely advantage for video stabilization.
Performance
The LG G8X ThinQ’s Snapdragon 855 (7nm) was a flagship processor in its time, featuring an octa-core configuration with a prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz. The Samsung Galaxy A54 counters with the Exynos 1380 (5nm). Despite the 855’s higher clock speed, the Exynos 1380’s more efficient 5nm process gives it a thermal advantage, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The A54’s Cortex-A78 cores offer strong multi-core performance, but the 855’s Adreno 640 GPU still holds an edge in raw graphical power, making the G8X better suited for graphically intensive gaming.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A54 edges out the LG G8X ThinQ in battery endurance, achieving an endurance rating of 119 hours versus the G8X’s 111 hours. While the G8X supports faster 21W wired charging with PD and QC3, and 9W wireless charging, the A54’s 25W wired charging provides a quicker top-up. The A54’s more efficient Exynos 1380 chipset contributes to its longer battery life, despite the G8X’s larger battery capacity (implied by the endurance rating).
Buying Guide
Buy the LG G8X ThinQ if you need a phone capable of handling demanding games and applications without throttling, and if you appreciate the flexibility of a customizable Android experience. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A54 if you prefer a phone with exceptional battery life, a brighter and more color-accurate display for media consumption, and the peace of mind of Samsung’s software support.