LG G8X ThinQ vs. LG V60 ThinQ 5G: A Deep Dive Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and value, the LG G8X ThinQ emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 855, coupled with a superior endurance rating of 111 hours, provides a smoother, longer-lasting experience, especially considering the price difference. The V60's 5G is less relevant now, and the performance gains don't justify the cost premium.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | LG G8X ThinQ | LG V60 ThinQ 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 2, 4, 5, 12, 25, 26, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - USA |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat20 1960/75 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (7CA) Cat22, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66 - USA | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, September 06. Released 2019, November 01 | 2020, February 26. Released 2020, March 20 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.3 x 75.8 x 8.4 mm (6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 169.3 x 77.6 x 8.9 mm (6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 213 g (Global)/ 218 g (Verizon) (7.51 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) MIL-STD-810G compliant* *does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) MIL-STD-810G compliant* Method 516.6, Procedure IV "Transit Drop" *does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, HDR10 | P-OLED, HDR10+ |
| Always-on display | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 12 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual-SIM model | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual-SIM model |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 12 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 9mm (ultrawide), 1.0µm | 64 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (standard), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/1.9, 12mm (ultrawide), 1/3.4", 1.0µm 0.3 MP, TOF 3D, f/1.4, (depth) |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 3.15 MP, AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 24-bit/192kHz stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, HDR10+, 24-bit/192kHz stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 10 MP, f/1.9, 30mm (standard), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio 24-bit/192kHz audio recording Tuned by Meridian Audio | 32-bit/192kHz audio 24-bit/192kHz audio recording | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio (USA model only) |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Browser | HTML, Adobe Flash | - |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 21W wired, PD, QC3 9W wireless | Wired, PD2.0, QC4 Wireless |
| Talk time | Up to 12 h (multimedia) | - |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | New Aurora Black | Classy Blue, Classy White |
| Models | LMG850EMW, LM-G850, 901LG, LM-G850N | LM-V600, A001LG |
| Price | About 560 EUR | About 700 EUR |
| SAR | 1.12 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.90 W/kg (head) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -93.2dB / Crosstalk -93.4dB | - |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 111h | Endurance rating 103h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -24.9 LUFS (Very good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 339726 (v7), 411980 (v8) GeekBench: 11251 (v4.4), 2870 (v5.1) GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
LG G8X ThinQ
- Exceptional battery life (111h endurance)
- More affordable price point
- Capable Snapdragon 855 processor
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- Older chipset compared to V60
LG V60 ThinQ 5G
- 5G connectivity
- More powerful Snapdragon 865 processor
- Faster charging support
- Shorter battery life (103h endurance)
- Higher price compared to G8X
- Potential for throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both devices feature high-quality displays, but the LG G8X ThinQ boasts a measured peak brightness of 603 nits, suggesting a more visible screen outdoors. While both have an 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal), the G8X's brightness advantage is a tangible benefit. The V60's display specs are not provided, making a direct comparison difficult, but LG's flagship displays typically prioritize color accuracy and viewing angles, which the V60 likely matches or exceeds. The lack of high refresh rate on either device is a notable omission by today's standards.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Given LG's history, both likely feature versatile camera systems with multiple lenses. However, without sensor size, aperture, or OIS details, a meaningful comparison is impossible. It's reasonable to assume the V60 benefits from improved image processing capabilities thanks to the newer ISP within the Snapdragon 865, potentially leading to better dynamic range and low-light performance. The absence of detail regarding secondary cameras (ultrawide, telephoto) makes it difficult to assess overall camera versatility.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the G8X utilizes the Snapdragon 855 (7nm) while the V60 steps up to the Snapdragon 865 5G (7nm+). The 865 offers improvements in CPU and GPU performance, with its Cortex-A77 cores representing an architectural upgrade over the Kryo 485 cores in the 855. However, the 865's increased power draw contributes to the V60's lower endurance rating. The 7nm+ process node offers incremental efficiency gains, but the V60's 5G modem adds further power consumption. For most users, the real-world performance difference will be noticeable in demanding games and applications, but the G8X remains highly capable for everyday tasks.
Battery Life
The LG G8X ThinQ shines in battery endurance, achieving a measured 111 hours, compared to the V60's 103 hours. This 8-hour difference is significant and translates to a noticeable advantage in real-world usage. While the V60 supports faster charging with QC4 and PD2.0, the G8X's 21W wired charging with QC3 and PD is still respectable. The V60's wireless charging support is a convenience feature, but the G8X's 9W wireless charging is adequate for topping up overnight. The G8X's superior endurance rating effectively mitigates the V60's faster charging capabilities.
Buying Guide
Buy the LG G8X ThinQ if you need exceptional battery life and a reliable, capable processor for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. It's the ideal choice for users who prioritize longevity and value. Buy the LG V60 ThinQ 5G if you absolutely require 5G connectivity (and live in an area with robust coverage) and demand the slightly faster processing power of the Snapdragon 865 for demanding applications and heavier gaming, and are willing to accept a shorter battery life.