LG G8 ThinQ vs LG V40 ThinQ: Which Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the LG G8 ThinQ emerges as the superior choice. The Snapdragon 855 offers a noticeable performance uplift over the V40’s Snapdragon 845, coupled with faster charging and slightly better battery life. While the V40 boasts a higher nominal contrast ratio, the G8’s brighter display provides a better viewing experience in direct sunlight.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | LG G8 ThinQ | LG V40 ThinQ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - V405QA7 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - USA | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66, 71 - V405QA7 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat19 1600/150 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (4CA) Cat16 1024/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 13, 20, 28, 46, 48, 66 - Verison | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO - V405QA7 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, February 24. Released 2019, April 11 | 2018, October 03. Released 2018, October 16 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 151.9 x 71.8 x 8.4 mm (5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 in) | 158.8 x 75.7 x 7.6 mm (6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 167 g (5.89 oz) | 169 g (5.96 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) MIL-STD-810G compliant* Method 516.6, Procedure IV "Transit Drop" *does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) MIL-STD-810G compliant* *does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~564 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~537 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.1 inches, 91.0 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | P-OLED, HDR10 | P-OLED, HDR10 |
| Always-on display | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Adreno 630 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11 | Android 8.1 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) - single-SIM modelmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual-SIM model | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual or Triple | 12 MP, f/1.5, 27mm (standard), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/1.9, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm, no AF or 12 MP, f/1.5, 27mm (standard), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/1.9, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm, no AF 12 MP, 52mm (telephoto), f/2.4, 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, dual pixel PDAF, OIS | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 12 MP, 27mm (standard), f/1.5, 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, 3-axis OIS 12 MP, 52mm (telephoto), f/2.4, 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, 16mm (ultrawide), f/1.9, 1/3.1", 1.0µm, no AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@240fps, HDR10, 24-bit/192kHz stereo sound rec. | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 24-bit/192kHz stereo sound rec., HDR video, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 8 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (standard), 1/3.2", 1.4µm 5 MP, 21mm (wide), f/2.2, 1.4µm |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/3.6", 1.22µm, AF TOF 3D, f/1.4, (depth/biometrics sensor) | - |
| Video | 1080p@60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | 32-bit/192kHz audio 24-bit/48kHz audio recording Tuned with Meridian Audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Face ID, Hand ID, fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 21W wired, PD, QC3 9W wireless | 18W wired, PD2.0, QC3, 50% in 36 min 10W wireless (Qi) |
| Type | Li-Po 3500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 3300 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Platinum Gray, New Aurora Black, New Moroccan Blue, Carmine Red | New Platinum Gray, Carmine Red, New Aurora Black, New Moroccan Blue |
| Models | LMG820QM7, LM-G820UMB, LMG820UM0, LMG820UM1, LMG820UM2, LM-G820N, LM-G820, LM-G820QM | V405, LM-V405, LM-V409N |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 330 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -94.1dB / Crosstalk -87.6dB | Noise -93.3dB / Crosstalk -94.1dB |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 79h | Endurance rating 64h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: infinite | Contrast ratio: 161500:1 (nominal), 4.256 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 68dB / Noise 74dB / Ring 92dB | Voice 68dB / Noise 74dB / Ring 77dB |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 331537 (v7), 362730 (v8) GeekBench: 10735 (v4.4), 2700 (v5.1) GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 254304 (v7) GeekBench: 8568 (v4.4) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
LG G8 ThinQ
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 855
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Faster wired charging (21W)
- Better battery endurance (79h)
- Slower wireless charging (9W)
- Contrast ratio not explicitly specified
LG V40 ThinQ
- Higher nominal contrast ratio (161500:1)
- Slightly faster wireless charging (10W)
- Potentially lower price point (depending on market)
- Versatile triple camera system
- Less powerful Snapdragon 845
- Lower peak display brightness
- Shorter battery endurance (64h)
- Slower wired charging (18W)
Display Comparison
The LG G8 ThinQ’s display achieves a peak brightness of 655 nits, a significant advantage over the V40’s 4.256 nits in sunlight readability. While the V40 touts a nominal contrast ratio of 161500:1, a figure the G8 doesn’t directly match (reported as infinite), real-world viewing often prioritizes brightness and color accuracy. Both displays offer a similar overall experience in controlled lighting, but the G8’s higher peak brightness makes it more versatile for outdoor use. The lack of specific panel technology details for either phone makes it difficult to assess color gamut coverage or viewing angles beyond subjective observation.
Camera Comparison
Both the LG G8 and V40 ThinQ feature versatile camera systems capable of capturing both photo and video. However, detailed sensor specifications are absent from the provided data. The V40’s triple-camera setup was a standout feature at its launch, but without knowing the sensor sizes and apertures, a direct comparison is difficult. The image processing style between the two devices is likely different, with LG historically favoring vibrant colors. The absence of information regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device prevents a definitive assessment of low-light performance. It's safe to assume both phones offer a competent camera experience, but the G8’s newer image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 855 likely provides an advantage in dynamic range and noise reduction.
Performance
The LG G8 ThinQ’s Snapdragon 855 (7nm) represents a generational leap over the V40’s Snapdragon 845 (10nm). The 855’s more efficient manufacturing process and architectural improvements translate to better performance and thermal management. The G8’s CPU configuration – octa-core with a 2.84 GHz Kryo 485 prime core – provides a performance edge over the V40’s 2.8 GHz Kryo 385 Gold cores. This difference is particularly noticeable in sustained workloads, where the 855 is less prone to throttling. While both phones are capable of handling everyday tasks, the G8 offers a smoother experience with demanding games and applications.
Battery Life
The LG G8 ThinQ boasts an endurance rating of 79 hours, exceeding the V40’s 64 hours. This improvement is attributable to both the more efficient Snapdragon 855 and potentially a slightly optimized battery management system. The G8 also supports 21W wired charging with Power Delivery (PD) and Quick Charge 3 (QC3), allowing for faster charging compared to the V40’s 18W wired charging with PD2.0 and QC3. While both phones offer wireless charging, the G8’s 9W output is slower than the V40’s 10W. However, the G8’s faster wired charging mitigates this difference, offering a quicker path to a full charge.
Buying Guide
Buy the LG G8 ThinQ if you prioritize performance for demanding applications like gaming or video editing, and value faster charging speeds. Its brighter display is also ideal for outdoor use. Buy the LG V40 ThinQ if you are seeking a device with a potentially superior contrast ratio for media consumption in darker environments, and are willing to trade some processing power and charging speed for a potentially lower price point.