LG G7 One vs. Google Pixel 6a: A Detailed Comparison of Two Distinct Approaches
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 6a emerges as the better choice. While the LG G7 One boasts a capable Snapdragon 835, the Pixel 6a’s Google Tensor chip, coupled with superior software support and a brighter display, delivers a more modern and refined user experience. The Pixel 6a’s longevity and camera capabilities are key advantages.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | LG G7 One | Google Pixel 6a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - GX7AS, GB62Z (USA/Canada) |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GX7AS (USA/Canada) |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 40, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - G1AZG (International) | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018, August. Released 2018, October | 2022, May 11 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, July 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 153.2 x 71.9 x 7.9 mm (6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) | 152.2 x 71.8 x 8.9 mm (5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 156 g (5.50 oz) | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) MIL-STD-810G compliant* *does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~563 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.1 inches, 91.3 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, HDR10 | OLED, HDR |
| Always-on display | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.45 GHz Kryo & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 (10 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 540 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 8.1 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 10, Android One | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Features | Laser AF, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/1.6, 31mm (standard), 1/3.1", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC3 Wireless (USA) | 18W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 3000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4410 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | New Aurora Black, New Moroccan Blue | Chalk, Charcoal, Sage |
| Models | LMQ910UM, LM-Q910, LM-X510K, LM-Q927L, LM-X510S | GX7AS, GB62Z, G1AZG, GB17L |
| Price | About 350 EUR | $ 138.99 / C$ 228.74 / ₹ 23,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 94h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
LG G7 One
- Potentially lower purchase price
- Snapdragon 835 still capable for everyday tasks
- May offer expandable storage (depending on variant)
- Limited software update support
- Older chipset architecture
- Likely inferior display brightness and contrast
Google Pixel 6a
- Long-term software support from Google
- Superior camera performance and image processing
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- More efficient Google Tensor chipset
- May be slightly more expensive
- No expandable storage
- Potential for software bugs (common with new chips)
Display Comparison
The Pixel 6a’s display significantly outperforms the LG G7 One’s in terms of brightness, reaching a measured 876 nits. This makes it far more usable outdoors. While the LG G7 One’s display specs aren’t provided, it’s reasonable to assume it falls short of this peak brightness. The Pixel 6a also boasts an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting a superior OLED panel. The LG G7 One likely uses an LCD, which typically has lower contrast. Both devices lack high refresh rate displays, a common omission in this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6a’s camera system, while details are limited in the provided data, benefits from Google’s renowned computational photography. The Pixel series is known for its excellent image processing, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The LG G7 One’s camera capabilities, while respectable for its time, are unlikely to match the Pixel 6a’s image quality. The Pixel 6a’s software algorithms likely compensate for any potential hardware limitations, delivering consistently impressive results. We can assume the Pixel 6a has superior dynamic range and low-light performance.
Performance
The Google Tensor chip, fabricated on a 5nm process, represents a substantial architectural leap over the LG G7 One’s 10nm Snapdragon 835. The Tensor’s octa-core configuration, featuring Cortex-X1 performance cores, delivers significantly faster processing speeds (2.80 GHz) compared to the Snapdragon 835’s Kryo cores (2.45 GHz). While the Snapdragon 835 was a flagship chip in its time, the Tensor’s more efficient process node and newer core designs translate to better sustained performance and thermal management. The Pixel 6a benefits from Google’s software optimizations, further enhancing its performance.
Battery Life
Both the LG G7 One and Pixel 6a achieve an endurance rating of 94 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the Pixel 6a’s adoption of PD3.0 charging offers potentially faster and more efficient charging compared to the LG G7 One’s QC3 standard. While both support 18W wired charging, the charging protocol differences could result in slightly quicker top-ups for the Pixel 6a. The efficiency gains of the Tensor chip also contribute to comparable battery life despite potentially lower battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the LG G7 One if you prioritize a potentially lower price point and are comfortable with a device that will likely receive limited software updates. It's a good option for users who need a solid performer for basic tasks and don't rely heavily on the latest features. Buy the Google Pixel 6a if you value long-term software support, a superior camera experience, and the benefits of Google’s Tensor chip, including enhanced AI features and a brighter, more visible display in sunlight.