LG G7 Fit vs Samsung Galaxy S10+: A Detailed Comparison of Two Android Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a modern feature set and longer software support, the Samsung Galaxy S10+ is the clear winner. Its superior chipset, wireless charging, and reverse wireless capabilities outweigh the G7 Fit’s lower price. However, the G7 Fit remains a compelling option for budget-conscious users who prioritize a clean Android experience and don't need the latest bells and whistles.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | LG G7 Fit | Samsung Galaxy S10+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global, USA |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - USA | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Global |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat11 600/75 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (7CA) Cat20 2000/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 - EU | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018, August. Released 2018, November | 2019, February 20 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2019, March 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frameGlass front (Gorilla Glass 6), ceramic back, ceramic frame |
| Dimensions | 153.2 x 71.9 x 8 mm (6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) | 157.6 x 74.1 x 7.8 mm (6.20 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Single SIM (Nano-SIM) or Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 156 g (5.50 oz) | 175 g / 198 g (ceramic) (6.17 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) MIL-STD-810G compliant* *does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~563 ppi density) | 1440 x 3040 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~522 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.1 inches, 91.3 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 103.8 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, HDR10 | Dynamic AMOLED, HDR10+ |
| Always-on display | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Quad-core (2x2.35 GHz Kryo & 2x1.6 GHz Kryo) | Octa-core (2x2.73 GHz Mongoose M4 & 2x2.31 GHz Cortex-A75 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) - EMEA/LATAMOcta-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) - USA/China |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 821 (14 nm) | Exynos 9820 (8 nm) - EMEA/LATAMQualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) - USA/China |
| GPU | Adreno 530 | Mali-G76 MP12 - EMEA/LATAMAdreno 640 - USA/China |
| OS | Android 8.1 (Oreo) | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 12, One UI 4.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual SIM model only |
| Internal | 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, 28mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm, PDAF | - |
| Triple | - | 12 MP, f/1.5-2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.6", 1.0µm, AF, OIS, 2x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm, Super Steady video |
| Video | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@60fps (no EIS), 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@960fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS & OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 10 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.22µm, Dual Pixel PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 22mm (wide), 1/4", 1.12µm, depth sensor |
| Features | HDR | Dual video call, Auto-HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio (USA & Canada only) |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC3 | 15W wired, PD2.0 15W wireless (Qi/PMA) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 4100 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | New Aurora Black, New Platinum Gray | Prism White, Prism Black, Prism Green, Prism Blue, Canary Yellow, Flamingo Pink, Ceramic Black, Ceramic White, Cardinal Red, Smoke Blue |
| Models | LM-Q850, LMQ850EM, LMQ850QM, LMQ850EMW | SM-G975F, SM-G975U, SM-G975W, SM-G975U1, SM-G9750, SM-G975N, SM-G975X |
| Price | About 200 EUR | $ 199.00 / C$ 879.99 / £ 999.00 / € 299.00 / ₹ 39,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.03 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.52 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | - | Noise -93.0dB / Crosstalk -94.3dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 91h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal), 4.514 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.7 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 333736 (v7), 399901 (v8) GeekBench: 10387 (v4.4), 2190 (v5.1) GFXBench: 23fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
LG G7 Fit
- More affordable price point
- Near-stock Android experience
- Quick Charge 3.0 support
- Older chipset (Snapdragon 821)
- Limited software update support
- Lacks wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S10+
- More powerful chipset (Exynos 9820/Snapdragon 855)
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Superior display quality
- Higher price
- Samsung’s One UI software (preference-based)
- Slightly larger and heavier
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S10+ boasts a significantly more advanced display. While the G7 Fit’s display specs aren’t provided, the S10+ features an 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominally 4.514 in sunlight), suggesting superior visibility in bright conditions. The S10+’s panel technology, though not specified as LTPO, benefits from Samsung’s industry-leading display expertise. The S10+’s higher resolution and potentially higher peak brightness translate to a more vibrant and immersive viewing experience, especially for multimedia consumption. The G7 Fit likely uses an older generation AMOLED panel, lacking the refinements found in the S10+.
Camera Comparison
The context data lacks detailed camera specifications for both devices, making a precise comparison difficult. However, given Samsung’s camera prowess, the S10+ likely features a more versatile and capable camera system. The S10+ likely benefits from more advanced image processing algorithms and potentially larger sensor sizes. While the G7 Fit may produce acceptable images in good lighting conditions, the S10+ is expected to excel in low-light scenarios and offer greater dynamic range. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality, serving primarily as a marketing feature.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The LG G7 Fit’s Snapdragon 821 (14nm) is a capable performer, but the Samsung Galaxy S10+’s Exynos 9820 (8nm) or Snapdragon 855 (7nm) represents a substantial leap forward. The Exynos 9820’s octa-core configuration (2x2.73 GHz Mongoose M4, 2x2.31 GHz Cortex-A75, 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) and the Snapdragon 855’s (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485, 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485, 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) offer significantly more processing power and efficiency. The smaller fabrication process (8nm/7nm vs 14nm) translates to lower heat generation and improved sustained performance. This means the S10+ will handle demanding games and applications with greater ease and less throttling. The G7 Fit’s quad-core CPU (2x2.35 GHz Kryo & 2x1.6 GHz Kryo) will show its age in multi-threaded tasks.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy S10+ has an endurance rating of 91 hours, indicating excellent battery life. While the G7 Fit’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the S10+’s 15W wired charging, 15W wireless charging (Qi/PMA), and 4.5W reverse wireless charging provide significant convenience. The G7 Fit’s 18W Quick Charge 3.0 support is respectable, but lacks the versatility of the S10+’s wireless charging options. The S10+’s more efficient chipset also contributes to its longer battery life, despite potentially having a similar or smaller battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the LG G7 Fit if you need a capable smartphone on a tight budget, value a near-stock Android experience, and are comfortable with a device that won't receive extensive software updates. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S10+ if you prefer a feature-rich experience with wireless charging, reverse wireless charging, a superior display, and a more powerful processor for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing.