LG's G series has always been a contender in the smartphone market. The G3 Screen, with its powerful chipset, and the G2 Lite, aiming for affordability, present a compelling choice for budget-conscious buyers. Let's dive into a head-to-head comparison to see which phone emerges as the winner.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The LG G3 Screen boasts significantly superior performance thanks to its octa-core processor and more advanced chipset. While the G2 Lite offers a more budget-friendly option, the G3 Screen's speed and capabilities make it the clear winner for users prioritizing performance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA | HSDPA 850 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | - |
| EDGE | Yes | - |
| GPRS | Yes | - |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2014, October. Released 2014, December | 2014, November. Released 2014, November |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 157.8 x 81.8 x 9.5 mm (6.21 x 3.22 x 0.37 in) | 127.5 x 67.9 x 11.9 mm (5.02 x 2.67 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Micro-SIM | Dual SIM (dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 153.7 g (5.40 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~373 ppi density) | 480 x 800 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~207 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.9 inches, 96.0 cm2 (~74.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 4.5 inches, 57.6 cm2 (~66.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A15 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A7) | Quad-core 1.2 GHz |
| Chipset | LG Nuclun | - |
| OS | Android 4.4.4 (KitKat) | Android 4.4.2 (KitKat) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDHC (dedicated slot), 4 GB included |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 4GB 1GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP, 1/3.0", AF, OIS | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, HDR, stereo sound rec. | 480p |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 2.1 MP | VGA |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.0, A2DP |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | Up to 640 h (3G) | Up to 345 h (2G) / Up to 345 h (3G) |
| Talk time | Up to 13 h (3G) | Up to 15 h (2G) / Up to 11 h 30 min (3G) |
| Type | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 1820 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White | White, Black, Gold |
| Models | F490L | - |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 100 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.75 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
LG G3 Screen
- Superior Performance
- Likely Higher Resolution Display
- Potentially Better Camera
- More Advanced Chipset
- Likely Higher Price
- Potentially Shorter Battery Life
- Larger Size/Weight
LG G2 Lite
- More Affordable
- Potentially Longer Battery Life
- Compact Size
- Slower Performance
- Lower Resolution Display
- Less Advanced Camera
- Older Technology
Display Comparison
The LG G3 Screen likely featured a higher resolution display (likely QHD) and potentially a larger screen size compared to the G2 Lite's likely Full HD display. Color accuracy and brightness would also likely be superior on the G3 Screen, offering a more immersive viewing experience. The G2 Lite would still provide a decent display for everyday use.
Camera Comparison
While specific camera specs are missing, the G3 Screen likely had a more advanced camera system with features like Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) and potentially a higher megapixel count. The G2 Lite's camera would likely be adequate for casual photography but wouldn't match the G3 Screen's capabilities in low-light conditions or for capturing fast-moving subjects.
Performance
This is where the G3 Screen truly shines. Its octa-core processor (a mix of Cortex-A15 and Cortex-A7 cores) provides a substantial performance advantage over the G2 Lite's quad-core 1.2 GHz processor. Expect faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the G3 Screen. The Nuclun chipset is also likely more efficient than the G2 Lite's.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is unknown for both devices. However, the G3 Screen's more powerful processor and higher resolution display would likely consume more power, potentially resulting in shorter battery life compared to the G2 Lite, which has a less demanding chipset and display.
Buying Guide
The LG G3 Screen is ideal for users who demand smooth multitasking, gaming, and overall snappy performance. The LG G2 Lite is a good choice for those on a tight budget who primarily need a phone for basic communication and light usage.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the LG G3 Screen worth the extra cost?
If performance is a priority, the G3 Screen's octa-core processor and likely superior display make it a worthwhile investment. However, if you're on a tight budget and only need basic functionality, the G2 Lite is a viable option.
❓ What year were these phones released?
The LG G3 Screen was released in 2014, while the LG G2 Lite was released in 2014 as a more budget-friendly variant of the G2.
