In a market dominated by smartphones, basic feature phones continue to serve a vital purpose for users prioritizing simplicity, affordability, and long battery life. We pit the LG A200 against the Samsung E1200 Pusha, two devices representing the lower end of the mobile spectrum, to determine which offers the best value for its target demographic.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user seeking a no-frills, reliable feature phone, the Samsung E1200 Pusha likely offers a slightly better experience due to its known 156MHz processor. However, the LG A200's positioning and features remain largely unknown, making a definitive recommendation difficult.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 |
| EDGE | Class 12 | No |
| GPRS | Class 12 | No |
| Technology | GSM | GSM |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2011, April. Released 2011, Q3 | 2012. Released 2012 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 99.8 x 51 x 15.8 mm (3.93 x 2.01 x 0.62 in) | 108 x 45 x 13.5 mm (4.25 x 1.77 x 0.53 in) |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | Mini-SIM |
| Weight | 95 g (3.35 oz) | 65.1 g (2.29 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 176 x 220 pixels (~128 ppi density) | 128 x 128 pixels, 1:1 ratio (~119 ppi density) |
| Size | 2.2 inches, 15.2 cm2 (~29.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 1.52 inches, 7.5 cm2 (~15.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT, 65K colors | TFT, 65K colors |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | Yes | Yes |
| Card slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64MB RAM, 128MB ROM | - |
| Phonebook | 1000 entries | Yes |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Single | 2 MP | - |
| Video | 176x144 | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 2.1, A2DP | No |
| Positioning | No | No |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | 2.0 | Proprietary |
| WLAN | No | No |
| Features |
|---|
| Games | No | No |
| Java | Yes, MIDP 2.1 | No |
| Messaging | SMS, MMS, Email, IM | SMS |
| | MP3/AAC+/WMA/WAV player
MP4/H.263 player
Organizer
Predictive text input | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | Up to 100 h | Up to 720 h |
| Talk time | Up to 4 h | Up to 7 h |
| Type | Removable Li-Ion 900 mAh battery | Removable Li-Ion 800 mAh battery |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, White, Blue |
| Price | About 60 EUR | About 20 EUR |
| SAR | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.44 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.95 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | 0.81 W/kg (head) |
LG A200
- Potential for lower price point (depending on market)
- LG brand recognition for some users
- Long battery life (typical of feature phones)
- Unknown specifications make a thorough assessment impossible
- Likely limited performance compared to the Samsung E1200 Pusha
Samsung E1200 Pusha
- Known 156 MHz CPU provides a baseline level of performance
- Reliable and simple user experience
- Excellent battery life
- Limited functionality compared to smartphones
- Small screen and basic interface
Display Comparison
Given the nature of these devices, display specifications are likely very similar – small, low-resolution color screens optimized for text readability and minimal power consumption. Without specific data on the LG A200, it's reasonable to assume both utilize TN panels prioritizing cost over color accuracy. The screen size is likely around 1.7-2.0 inches for both.
Camera Comparison
Neither device is expected to feature a camera of any significant quality. Feature phones at this price point typically omit cameras entirely or include extremely low-resolution sensors unsuitable for anything beyond basic documentation. Any camera present on the LG A200 would likely be comparable to, or inferior to, the E1200 Pusha's if it exists.
Performance
The Samsung E1200 Pusha’s 156 MHz CPU represents the core of its processing capability. While modest by modern standards, this CPU is sufficient for basic tasks like making calls, sending SMS messages, and potentially running simple pre-installed games. The LG A200’s processor is unknown, but given its market segment, it’s likely in a similar range, or potentially even lower, impacting responsiveness. The lack of RAM specifications for both devices means multitasking is severely limited.
Battery Life
Both the LG A200 and Samsung E1200 Pusha are designed for exceptional battery life. The absence of power-hungry features like large displays, GPS, or data connectivity allows for standby times measured in weeks, rather than days. Battery capacity is likely in the 800-1000 mAh range for both, and charging times will be relatively slow via their respective proprietary connectors.
Buying Guide
Buy the LG A200 if you prioritize brand loyalty to LG and can find it at a significantly lower price point than the Samsung E1200 Pusha. Buy the Samsung E1200 Pusha if you value a known, albeit modest, level of performance from its 156MHz CPU and a generally reliable user experience within the basic feature phone category.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ What network compatibility does the Samsung E1200 Pusha offer?
The Samsung E1200 Pusha is a 2G-only device, meaning it's compatible with GSM networks. It will not support 3G, 4G, or 5G networks, and its functionality will be limited in regions where 2G networks are being phased out.
❓ Can I use a microSD card to expand storage on either the LG A200 or Samsung E1200 Pusha?
Both the LG A200 and Samsung E1200 Pusha likely support microSD card expansion, though the maximum supported capacity is typically limited to 32GB or 64GB. This allows users to store more contacts, SMS messages, and potentially a small number of ringtones or simple images.
❓ Is Bluetooth supported on the Samsung E1200 Pusha?
Yes, the Samsung E1200 Pusha does include Bluetooth connectivity, allowing for hands-free calling with compatible headsets and potentially transferring contacts or other data to other Bluetooth-enabled devices.
