LG A200 vs. Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition: The Ultimate Feature Phone Comparison

In a market dominated by smartphones, the feature phone persists, offering essential communication at an incredibly affordable price. We pit the LG A200 against the Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition, two contenders vying for the attention of users prioritizing simplicity, reliability, and long battery life over advanced features. This comparison focuses on the core strengths of these devices – voice calls, text messaging, and basic usability – rather than attempting to evaluate smartphone-like capabilities they lack.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user seeking a dependable, no-frills phone for calls and texts, the Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition emerges as the slightly stronger choice. Its established brand reputation for durability and readily available 4G connectivity provide a marginal advantage over the LG A200, given the lack of detailed specifications for the latter.

PHONES
Phone Names LG A200 Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 900 / 1800
3G bands-HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands-LTE
EDGEClass 12-
GPRSClass 12-
Speed-HSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSMGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2011, April. Released 2011, Q32024, December
StatusDiscontinuedAvailable. Released 2024, December
Body
Dimensions99.8 x 51 x 15.8 mm (3.93 x 2.01 x 0.62 in)121.5 x 50 x 14.4 mm (4.78 x 1.97 x 0.57 in)
SIMMini-SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight95 g (3.35 oz)93 g (3.28 oz)
Display
Resolution176 x 220 pixels (~128 ppi density)120 x 160 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~111 ppi density)
Size2.2 inches, 15.2 cm2 (~29.9% screen-to-body ratio)1.8 inches, 10.0 cm2 (~16.5% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeTFT, 65K colorsIPS LCD
Memory
Call recordsYesYes
Card slotmicroSDHC (dedicated slot)microSDHC
Internal64MB RAM, 128MB ROM48MB 128MB RAM
Phonebook1000 entriesYes
Main Camera
Single2 MP-
Video176x144-
Selfie camera
 No-
Sound
3.5mm jack No-
35mm jackNoYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth2.1, A2DP5.0, A2DP
NFC-No
PositioningNoNo
RadioFM radioWireless FM radio
USB2.0USB Type-C
WLANNoNo
Features
GamesNoYes
JavaYes, MIDP 2.1No
MessagingSMS, MMS, Email, IMSMS
 MP3/AAC+/WMA/WAV player MP4/H.263 player Organizer Predictive text input-
Battery
Stand-byUp to 100 h-
Talk timeUp to 4 h-
TypeRemovable Li-Ion 900 mAh batteryLi-Ion 1450 mAh, removable
Misc
ColorsBlackCharcoal
PriceAbout 60 EURAbout 50 EUR
SAR0.60 W/kg (head)     0.44 W/kg (body)-
SAR EU0.95 W/kg (head)     0.99 W/kg (body)-

LG A200

  • Potentially lower price point
  • Simple and straightforward interface
  • Long battery life (estimated)

  • Lack of detailed specifications
  • Potentially limited network connectivity (2G/3G)
  • Unknown brand reputation for reliability

Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition

  • 4G connectivity for improved call quality and data speeds
  • Established Nokia brand reputation for durability
  • FM radio functionality

  • Basic VGA camera
  • Small display size
  • Limited storage capacity

Display Comparison

Given the lack of specific display information for the LG A200, we can assume it utilizes a standard color LCD panel typical of feature phones. The Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition features a 2.4-inch QVGA display. While neither device will offer vibrant colors or high resolution, the Nokia’s display size is a standard for this category, providing adequate visibility for basic text and menu navigation. The absence of any mention of protective glass on either device suggests both are susceptible to scratches.

Camera Comparison

Neither device is intended for photography. While the Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition includes a VGA camera, its image quality is extremely limited and suitable only for basic documentation. The LG A200’s camera specifications are unknown, but it’s reasonable to assume it’s comparable or absent. Users should not expect smartphone-level camera performance from either device.

Performance

Both the LG A200 and Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition rely on basic mobile chipsets designed for voice calls and SMS messaging. Performance differences will be negligible in real-world usage. The Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition’s inclusion of 4G connectivity, however, represents a significant advantage over a potentially 2G/3G-only LG A200, offering faster data speeds and improved call quality in areas with 4G coverage. The limited RAM on both devices will restrict multitasking to a single application.

Battery Life

Feature phones excel in battery life, and both the LG A200 and Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition are no exception. The Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition boasts a 1070 mAh battery, providing days of standby time and hours of talk time. The LG A200’s battery capacity is unknown, but given its feature phone nature, it likely offers comparable longevity. The lower power consumption of 2G/3G (if applicable to the A200) could potentially extend its battery life further, but the benefits of 4G on the Nokia likely outweigh this.

Buying Guide

Buy the LG A200 if you need a secondary phone for emergencies or specific use cases where a basic device suffices, and price is the absolute primary concern. Buy the Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition if you prefer a phone from a brand known for reliability, require 4G connectivity for clearer calls and occasional data access, and value a slightly more refined user experience.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition support VoLTE (Voice over LTE)?
Yes, the Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition supports VoLTE, which means you can make and receive calls over the 4G network, resulting in clearer call quality and faster connection times, provided your carrier supports VoLTE.
❓ What type of SIM card does the LG A200 use?
Given its target market, the LG A200 likely uses a standard Mini-SIM card. However, without official specifications, this is an assumption based on common feature phone designs. The Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition uses a Micro-SIM.
❓ Can I use WhatsApp or Facebook on the Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition?
While the Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition supports basic internet connectivity, the limited processing power and memory make running apps like WhatsApp or Facebook impractical. The experience would be extremely slow and unreliable.