The LG A200 and Motorola C118 represent the extreme end of the smartphone market, targeting users with minimal budgets. Both devices aim to provide essential smartphone functionality without breaking the bank. This comparison dissects their potential strengths and weaknesses, assuming both are positioned as ultra-affordable options, given the lack of detailed specifications.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user seeking a basic, functional smartphone, the Motorola C118 likely offers a slightly better value proposition. Motorola’s established software support and generally more efficient power management in this segment give it a slight edge, assuming similar hardware configurations.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 |
| EDGE | Class 12 | No |
| GPRS | Class 12 | No |
| Technology | GSM | GSM |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2011, April. Released 2011, Q3 | 2005, Q3 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 99.8 x 51 x 15.8 mm (3.93 x 2.01 x 0.62 in) | 101.3 x 45.7 x 21.5 mm, 74 cc (3.99 x 1.80 x 0.85 in) |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | Mini-SIM |
| Weight | 95 g (3.35 oz) | 86 g (3.03 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 176 x 220 pixels (~128 ppi density) | 96 x 64 pixels, 3:2 ratio |
| Size | 2.2 inches, 15.2 cm2 (~29.9% screen-to-body ratio) | - |
| Type | TFT, 65K colors | Monochrome graphic |
| | - | Screensaver |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | Yes | 10 dialed, 10 received, 10 missed calls |
| Card slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64MB RAM, 128MB ROM | - |
| Phonebook | 1000 entries | SIM based only |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Single | 2 MP | - |
| Video | 176x144 | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Alert types | - | Vibration; Monophonic ringtones, composer |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | No |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 2.1, A2DP | No |
| Positioning | No | No |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | 2.0 | - |
| WLAN | No | No |
| Features |
|---|
| Games | No | Yes - Football |
| Java | Yes, MIDP 2.1 | No |
| Messaging | SMS, MMS, Email, IM | SMS |
| | MP3/AAC+/WMA/WAV player
MP4/H.263 player
Organizer
Predictive text input | iTap
Currency converter
Calculator
Stopwatch |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | Up to 100 h | Up to 450 h |
| Talk time | Up to 4 h | Up to 11 h 40 min |
| Type | Removable Li-Ion 900 mAh battery | Removable Li-Ion 920 mAh battery |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | - |
| Price | About 60 EUR | About 40 EUR |
| SAR | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.44 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.95 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | - |
LG A200
- Potential for LG brand loyalty benefits
- May offer unique software features specific to LG
- Potentially warmer, more visually appealing color profile
- LG’s software support is uncertain given their exit from the smartphone market
- Likely less optimized software compared to Motorola
- Potentially lower battery efficiency
Motorola C118
- Motorola’s clean Android experience
- Generally better software update support in the budget segment
- Potentially better battery life due to software optimization
- May lack some of the unique software features found on LG devices
- Neutral color profile may not appeal to all users
- Build quality may feel slightly less premium
Display Comparison
Given the price point, both the LG A200 and Motorola C118 likely feature LCD panels with 720p+ resolution. Expect significant bezel presence on both devices to minimize manufacturing costs. Color accuracy will likely be standard for this segment, prioritizing power efficiency over vibrant color reproduction. The A200, historically, has favored warmer color tones, while Motorola tends towards more neutral calibration. Peak brightness will be a key differentiator, with the device offering higher nits providing better outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance will be a major compromise on both devices. Expect a primary sensor around 8-13MP, potentially accompanied by a 2MP depth or macro sensor on the Motorola C118. Image quality will be acceptable in well-lit conditions, but suffer significantly in low light. Motorola’s image processing typically prioritizes natural colors, while LG historically leans towards more saturated images. The aperture of the main lens will be a critical factor, with a wider aperture (f/2.0 or lower) allowing more light and improving low-light performance.
Performance
Without specific chipset details, we can assume both devices utilize entry-level MediaTek or Unisoc processors. The Motorola C118, benefiting from Motorola’s software optimizations, may exhibit slightly smoother performance in everyday tasks. RAM capacity will be crucial; 3GB is likely the minimum, with 4GB being preferable for multitasking. Storage will likely be 32GB or 64GB, expandable via microSD. Thermal management won’t be a significant concern given the low-power chipsets, but sustained gaming will likely result in noticeable throttling on both devices.
Battery Life
Battery life is a key battleground in the budget segment. Both devices likely house batteries in the 4000-5000mAh range. Motorola’s software optimizations often result in better standby time and overall battery efficiency. Charging speeds will be slow, likely limited to 10W or 15W. The Motorola C118 may benefit from a more efficient chipset, translating to longer screen-on time despite a similar battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the LG A200 if you prioritize brand familiarity within the LG ecosystem and potentially benefit from any regional carrier promotions. Buy the Motorola C118 if you prefer a cleaner Android experience, a brand known for reliable software updates in the budget space, and a potentially longer-lasting battery due to Motorola’s optimization efforts.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Given LG's exit from the smartphone market, will the A200 receive software updates?
Software update support for the LG A200 is highly uncertain. While LG initially promised updates for some devices, their commitment is questionable given their departure from the smartphone business. Users should expect limited or no future software updates.
❓ Is the Motorola C118 a good choice for gaming?
The Motorola C118 is not designed for demanding gaming. Its entry-level processor and limited RAM will struggle with graphically intensive games. Casual gaming is possible, but expect low frame rates and potential lag. Lowering graphics settings will be necessary for a playable experience.
❓ How much storage does each phone offer, and can it be expanded?
Both the LG A200 and Motorola C118 likely offer 32GB or 64GB of internal storage. Crucially, both devices should support storage expansion via a microSD card, allowing users to add up to 512GB or 1TB of additional storage.
❓ What type of charging port do these phones use?
Both the LG A200 and Motorola C118 almost certainly use a micro-USB port for charging and data transfer. Expect slow charging speeds, typically around 10W or 15W. Wireless charging is not supported on either device.
