Lenovo Z6 Pro 5G vs Realme X50 Pro 5G: A Detailed Comparison of Snapdragon Generations
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme X50 Pro 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Z6 Pro’s 855, and the blazing-fast 65W charging significantly reduces downtime. While both offer similar battery endurance ratings, the X50 Pro’s speed advantage justifies its slightly higher price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Lenovo Z6 Pro 5G | Realme X50 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | 41, 78 NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, June 26. Released 2019, November 15 | 2020, February 24. Released 2020, March 05 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 157.5 x 74.6 x 8.7 mm (6.20 x 2.94 x 0.34 in) | 159 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.39 inches, 100.2 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, HDR10 | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), ZUI 11 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF 16 MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultrawide) 2 MP, f/1.8, 2.9µm, PDAF, OIS (dedicated video camera) TOF 3D, (depth) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.5, 54mm (telephoto), 2x optical zoom, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 13mm (ultrawide), PDAF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 35 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | 4200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Red, Blue | Moss Green, Rust Red |
| Models | - | RMX2075, RMX2071, RMX2076 |
| Price | About 400 EUR | About 360 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 90h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -23.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 592447 (v8) GeekBench: 3175 (v5.1) GFXBench: 45fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Lenovo Z6 Pro 5G
- Lower price point
- Solid performance for everyday tasks
- Acceptable battery life
- Outdated Snapdragon 855 chipset
- Slow 18W charging
- Likely inferior display brightness
Realme X50 Pro 5G
- Faster Snapdragon 865 chipset
- Blazing-fast 65W charging
- Brighter display
- Higher price
- Potentially more heat generation under heavy load
- Similar battery endurance to Z6 Pro despite faster chip
Display Comparison
The Realme X50 Pro 5G boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 635 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Z6 Pro. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels (given the era and price point), the X50 Pro’s higher brightness translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. Contrast ratio is listed as infinite for the X50 Pro, a typical marketing claim for LCDs, but doesn’t indicate superior panel technology. Both phones likely feature a standard 60Hz refresh rate, common for this generation of devices.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. However, given the era, it’s reasonable to assume both feature multi-camera setups. The Realme X50 Pro 5G likely benefits from the improved image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 865, resulting in better dynamic range and noise reduction. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult, but the 865’s processing capabilities give the X50 Pro an edge. The inclusion of a dedicated Night Mode and improved video stabilization are also likely advantages for the X50 Pro.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme X50 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 865 (7nm+) represents a significant architectural leap over the Lenovo Z6 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 855 (7nm). The 865 features the newer Cortex-A77 cores in its prime configuration (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77) versus the Kryo 485 cores (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485) in the 855. This translates to approximately 10-15% faster CPU performance in benchmarks and real-world applications. The 865 also benefits from an improved GPU, offering a more substantial gaming performance advantage. While both phones likely utilize LPDDR4X RAM, the 865’s improved memory controller further enhances overall system responsiveness.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both phones achieve an endurance rating of 90 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the more powerful chipset in the X50 Pro. This is likely due to optimizations in software and battery management. However, the charging experience is drastically different. The Lenovo Z6 Pro 5G is limited to 18W wired charging, while the Realme X50 Pro 5G supports a blistering 65W wired charging with Power Delivery (PD), achieving a full charge in just 35 minutes. This difference in charging speed is a major convenience factor for the X50 Pro.
Buying Guide
Buy the Lenovo Z6 Pro 5G if you prioritize a lower initial cost and are comfortable with a slightly less responsive experience. It’s a solid option for everyday tasks and casual gaming. Buy the Realme X50 Pro 5G if you demand the fastest possible performance, particularly for gaming and demanding applications, and value the convenience of incredibly rapid charging. It’s the better choice for power users and those who frequently multitask.