The Lenovo Yoga Tab and Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE represent distinct approaches to the Android tablet market. The Yoga Tab aims for flagship-level performance with its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, while the S9 FE focuses on a balance of features and affordability with the Exynos 1380. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which tablet best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw power and sustained performance, the Lenovo Yoga Tab emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset delivers a significant advantage in demanding tasks, complemented by a robust 101:55h endurance rating. However, the Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE remains a compelling option for those seeking a more budget-friendly experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | N/A | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA, LTE, 5G - cellular model only |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 05 | 2023, October 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September | Available. Released 2023, October 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), aluminum frame, aluminum back | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 255.5 x 165.8 x 8.3 mm (10.06 x 6.53 x 0.33 in) | 254.3 x 165.8 x 6.5 mm (10.01 x 6.53 x 0.26 in) |
| SIM | No | Nano-SIM + eSIM (cellular model only) |
| Weight | 458 g (1.01 lb) | 523 g or 524 g (1.15 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 3200 x 2000 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~340 ppi density) | 1440 x 2304 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~249 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.1 inches, 357.3 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.9 inches, 344.5 cm2 (~81.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, 650 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | - | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, 101˚ (ultrawide) | 12 MP, (ultrawide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers, Dolby Atmos (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS - cellular model only |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, DisplayPort, magnetic accessory connector | USB Type-C 2.0, magnetic connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (accessories only) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired | 45W wired, QC2.0 |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 8860 mAh | Li-Po 8000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Luna Grey, Seashell | Mint, Silver, Gray, Lavender |
| Models | ZAG60266US, TB710FU | SM-X510, SM-X516B |
| Price | $ 449.99 | About 300 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.55 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 101:55h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class F | - |
| Free fall | Class E (7 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class A | - |
Lenovo Yoga Tab
- Significantly faster processor with Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Exceptional battery endurance (101:55h)
- Long-lasting battery health (1000 charge cycles)
- Camera details are unknown, potentially less versatile
- May command a higher price point
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
- More affordable price point
- Quick Charge 2.0 compatibility
- Likely a more versatile camera system
- Less powerful processor (Exynos 1380)
- Lower overall performance compared to the Yoga Tab
Display Comparison
While both tablets likely feature LCD panels (data not provided), the core difference lies in their processing power, impacting UI responsiveness. The absence of display specs necessitates focusing on the chipset's ability to drive a smooth visual experience. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3's superior GPU will likely translate to better frame rates in graphically intensive applications, even on a similar display.
Camera Comparison
Given the context data lacks camera details, a direct comparison is limited. However, considering the S9 FE’s positioning, it likely features a more versatile camera system than the Yoga Tab, which prioritizes performance. We can assume the S9 FE will have a more refined image processing pipeline, potentially offering better dynamic range and low-light performance. The Yoga Tab may focus on basic functionality, sufficient for video calls and casual snapshots.
Performance
The Lenovo Yoga Tab’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) chipset is a clear step above the Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE’s Exynos 1380 (5nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.3 GHz, alongside its more modern Cortex-A720 cores, provides a substantial performance uplift over the S9 FE’s Cortex-A78 cores. The 4nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during extended use. This means the Yoga Tab will maintain higher clock speeds for longer periods, crucial for demanding tasks like video editing or gaming. The Exynos 1380, while capable, is geared towards efficiency rather than outright speed.
Battery Life
The Lenovo Yoga Tab boasts an impressive 101:55h endurance rating, suggesting exceptional battery life. While the S9 FE’s battery capacity is unknown, the Yoga Tab’s efficiency, coupled with its 1000 charge cycle lifespan, provides a significant advantage. Both support 45W wired charging, but the S9 FE adds Quick Charge 2.0 compatibility, potentially allowing for faster charging speeds with compatible chargers. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s 4nm process contributes to lower power consumption, further extending the Yoga Tab’s runtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Lenovo Yoga Tab if you need uncompromising performance for gaming, video editing, or multitasking, and value long-term battery health with its 1000 cycle lifespan. Buy the Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE if you prefer a more affordable tablet with a well-rounded feature set, and prioritize compatibility with Quick Charge 2.0 for faster charging with existing accessories.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy Tab S9 FE tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 1380 is a relatively efficient chip, but it's not designed for sustained peak performance like the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. While it won't likely overheat to the point of shutdown, users may experience some thermal throttling after extended gaming, leading to reduced frame rates. The Yoga Tab's superior thermal management should mitigate this issue.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3's 4nm process impact the long-term performance of the Lenovo Yoga Tab?
The 4nm fabrication process is crucial for both performance and efficiency. It allows for a higher transistor density, resulting in increased processing power, while simultaneously reducing power consumption and heat generation. This translates to sustained performance over longer periods and contributes to the Yoga Tab's impressive 101:55h endurance rating and 1000 charge cycle lifespan.
❓ Is Quick Charge 2.0 on the S9 FE a significant advantage over the Yoga Tab's 45W charging?
Quick Charge 2.0 can offer faster charging speeds *if* you have a compatible charger. However, the Yoga Tab's 45W charging is still quite fast, and the difference may not be substantial if using a standard 45W charger. The Yoga Tab's battery endurance means you may not need to charge as frequently anyway.
