Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab vs. Google Pixel 7 Pro: A Tale of Two Devices
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a versatile smartphone experience with a class-leading camera and powerful performance, the Google Pixel 7 Pro is the clear winner. However, the Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab offers a unique, hands-free experience and smart home integration at a significantly lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab | Google Pixel 7 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | N/A | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GE2AE |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - GE2AE |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GP4BC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, October. Released 2019, October | 2022, October 06 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, October 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 242mm x 166mm x 8.5-24mm | 162.9 x 76.6 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | No | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 580 g (1.28 lb) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| Built-in 3-stage kickstand | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~224 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~73.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.45 GHz Cortex A53) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439 (12 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 505 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, AF | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | No | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 7000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Iron Grey | Obsidian, Snow, Hazel |
| Models | YT-X705X | GP4BC, GE2AE, GFE4J |
| Price | About 320 EUR | € 248.84 / $ 204.00 / £ 259.99 / ₹ 36,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 83h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 796369 (v9) GeekBench: 3187 (v5.1) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab
- Unique smart display functionality
- Hands-free operation for video calls and media
- Affordable price point
- Weak processor performance
- Limited camera capabilities
- Slow charging speed
Google Pixel 7 Pro
- Exceptional camera quality
- Powerful performance with Tensor G2
- Fast charging and wireless charging
- Higher price tag
- Larger and heavier form factor
- Can be overkill for basic tasks
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, peaking at 1090 nits, making it far more usable outdoors than the Yoga Smart Tab (brightness data unavailable). While the Yoga Smart Tab’s display size isn’t specified, its primary function isn’t color accuracy or high refresh rates; it’s visibility and usability as a smart display. The Pixel 7 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) delivers deeper blacks and a more immersive viewing experience. The Pixel 7 Pro likely utilizes LTPO technology for variable refresh rates, conserving battery life, a feature absent in the Yoga Smart Tab.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7 Pro’s camera system is a major differentiator. While both devices offer photo and video capabilities, the Pixel 7 Pro’s sensor size, lens apertures, and Google’s computational photography expertise provide a vastly superior image quality. The Yoga Smart Tab’s camera is likely a basic module for video calls, lacking the advanced features like optical image stabilization (OIS) and sophisticated image processing found in the Pixel 7 Pro. The Pixel 7 Pro’s camera excels in low-light conditions and offers features like Magic Eraser and Photo Unblur.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The Google Pixel 7 Pro’s Google Tensor G2 (5nm) chip, with its Cortex-X1, A78, and A55 cores, is in a different league than the Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (12nm). The Tensor G2’s 5nm fabrication process offers superior power efficiency and thermal performance, allowing for sustained high performance. The Pixel 7 Pro’s CPU architecture, with the high-performance X1 cores, delivers significantly faster processing speeds for demanding tasks like video editing and gaming. The Snapdragon 439 is geared towards basic tasks and will struggle with resource-intensive applications.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 83 hours, but the underlying factors differ. The Pixel 7 Pro achieves this with a more power-hungry chipset but benefits from a more efficient 5nm process and intelligent power management. The Yoga Smart Tab, with its less demanding Snapdragon 439, likely has a smaller battery capacity but consumes less power overall. The Pixel 7 Pro offers significantly faster charging at 23W wired (50% in 30 minutes), PD3.0, and 23W wireless with reverse wireless charging, while the Yoga Smart Tab is limited to 10W wired charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab if you need a portable, hands-free display for video calls, recipe viewing in the kitchen, or controlling your smart home devices. It excels as a secondary screen and entertainment hub. Buy the Google Pixel 7 Pro if you prioritize a premium smartphone experience with exceptional camera capabilities, fast performance for demanding apps, and long-term software support.