Lenovo's Tab K11 Plus and P11 Plus represent compelling options in the crowded Android tablet space, but cater to slightly different priorities. The K11 Plus leverages Qualcomm's efficiency, while the P11 Plus opts for MediaTek's performance-focused Helio G90T. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you determine which tablet best suits your usage.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing long-lasting battery life and consistent performance, the Lenovo Tab K11 Plus emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 680 chipset, coupled with impressive endurance, offers a smoother, more reliable experience for everyday tasks and media consumption. The P11 Plus offers a performance boost, but at the cost of efficiency.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE - cellular model only | HSPA, LTE - cellular model only |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, July 01 | 2021, June 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, July | Available. Released 2021, July 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back | - |
| Dimensions | 169 x 268.7 x 7.2 mm (6.65 x 10.58 x 0.28 in) | 258.4 x 163 x 7.5 mm (10.17 x 6.42 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM (cellular model only) | Nano-SIM (cellular model only) |
| Weight | 520 g (1.15 lb) | 490 g (1.08 lb) |
| | - | Stylus support |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | - |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~204 ppi density) | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~212 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.45 inches, 373.2 cm2 (~82.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 11.0 inches, 344.4 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6785 Helio G90T (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF | 13 MP, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS - cellular model only | GPS, GLONASS, BDS - cellular model only |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, magnetic connector pins | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 8600 mAh | Li-Po 7700 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Luna grey | Slate Grey, Platinum Grey, Modernist teal |
| Models | TB352FU | ZA940124SE |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 92:26h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class F | - |
| Free fall | Class E (3 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class A | - |
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
- Exceptional battery life (92:26h endurance)
- Efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset for sustained performance
- Long battery lifespan (1000 charge cycles)
- Potentially less powerful GPU compared to the P11 Plus
- Display specifications are unknown
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
- Higher clocked CPU cores for potentially faster single-core performance
- Helio G90T offers a performance boost for gaming
- May have a slightly better camera module
- Less efficient Helio G90T chipset leads to shorter battery life
- 12nm process may result in thermal throttling under heavy load
Display Comparison
Both tablets lack detailed display specifications in the provided data, but assuming typical Lenovo tablet construction, expect similar LCD panels. The key differentiator will likely be color calibration and brightness. Without specific nit ratings, it's difficult to declare a winner, but the P11 Plus, positioned slightly higher in the lineup, *may* benefit from a marginally better panel. However, the absence of high refresh rate support on either device limits their appeal for fast-paced gaming.
Camera Comparison
Neither tablet is positioned as a photography powerhouse, and the provided data doesn't offer specifics beyond the chipsets. We can assume both will feature adequate cameras for video calls and casual snapshots. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is impossible. However, given the P11 Plus’s slightly higher positioning, it *might* incorporate a marginally better camera module, but this is speculative.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Lenovo Tab K11 Plus features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (6nm), an octa-core processor built on a more efficient manufacturing process than the P11 Plus’s MediaTek Helio G90T (12nm). While the G90T boasts a higher clock speed on its prime cores (2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 vs 2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold), the Snapdragon 680’s architecture and 6nm process provide superior sustained performance and thermal management. The Snapdragon’s Kryo cores are designed for a balance of performance and efficiency, while the G90T prioritizes raw power, potentially leading to throttling under prolonged load. This makes the K11 Plus better suited for consistent performance during extended use.
Battery Life
The Lenovo Tab K11 Plus truly shines in battery endurance, boasting a remarkable 92:26h rating. This is a significant advantage over what we'd expect from the P11 Plus, given the less efficient Helio G90T. Both tablets support 20W wired charging, meaning 0-100% charge times will be comparable. However, the K11 Plus’s larger endurance means you’ll be charging it less frequently, making it the clear winner for users prioritizing all-day battery life. The 1000 charge cycle rating on the K11 Plus also suggests a longer lifespan for the battery itself.
Buying Guide
Buy the Lenovo Tab K11 Plus if you need a tablet primarily for extended media consumption, reading, or light productivity tasks where battery life is paramount. Its Snapdragon 680 excels in power efficiency, making it ideal for travel or all-day use. Buy the Lenovo Tab P11 Plus if you prioritize occasional gaming or more demanding applications and are willing to trade some battery life for a performance edge. The Helio G90T provides a noticeable boost in graphical processing power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio G90T in the Tab P11 Plus overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The MediaTek Helio G90T is known to generate more heat than the Snapdragon 680, particularly under sustained load. While the Tab P11 Plus likely has thermal management features, it's more prone to throttling during prolonged gaming compared to the K11 Plus, potentially leading to reduced frame rates over time.
❓ How does the 6nm process of the Snapdragon 680 impact the Tab K11 Plus's real-world performance?
The 6nm process allows the Snapdragon 680 to achieve higher transistor density and improved power efficiency compared to the 12nm process used in the Helio G90T. This translates to better sustained performance, less heat generation, and ultimately, longer battery life for the Tab K11 Plus, especially during demanding tasks.
❓ Is the difference in CPU clock speeds between the two tablets noticeable in everyday use?
While the P11 Plus has higher clocked CPU cores, the architectural advantages of the Snapdragon 680 and its more efficient process often outweigh the clock speed difference in typical usage scenarios. You're unlikely to notice a significant difference in app launch times or general navigation.
