The Android tablet market is heating up, with options ranging from budget-friendly media consumption devices to powerful productivity tools. The Lenovo Pad and Oppo Pad represent distinct approaches within this landscape. The Lenovo Pad aims for affordability with a capable mid-range chipset, while the Oppo Pad targets a more premium experience with a flagship-level processor. This comparison will dissect their key differences to determine which tablet best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Pad is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 870 5G chipset delivers significantly faster performance, making it ideal for gaming and demanding applications. While the Lenovo Pad offers a more affordable entry point, the Oppo Pad’s enhanced processing power and faster 33W charging justify the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 3G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 4G bands | N/A | N/A |
| EDGE | No | No |
| GPRS | No | No |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 24 | 2022, February 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 01 | Available. Released 2022, March 03 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 258.4 x 163 x 7.5 mm (10.17 x 6.42 x 0.30 in) | 252.2 x 163.8 x 7.1 mm (9.93 x 6.45 x 0.28 in) |
| SIM | No | No |
| Weight | 490 g (1.08 lb) | 507 g / 510 g (1.12 lb) |
| | Stylus support | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~212 ppi density) | 1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~274 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.0 inches, 344.4 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TDDI IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11, ZUI 12.5 | Android 11, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, AF | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP
TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, BDS | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Face recognition, accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired, QC3 | 33W wired, PD
5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 7700 mAh | Li-Po 8360 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray | Black, Silver, Purple |
| Models | ZA7R0232CN | OPD2101 |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 310 EUR |
Lenovo Pad
- More affordable price point
- Decent performance for basic tasks
- Reliable Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset
- Slower charging speed (20W)
- Less powerful processor for demanding tasks
- Likely lower quality display
Oppo Pad
- Significantly faster Snapdragon 870 5G processor
- Faster 33W charging with PD
- 5W reverse wired charging
- Likely higher quality display
- Higher price tag
- Potentially more expensive repairs
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Oppo Pad's positioning, it likely features a higher-quality panel with potentially better color accuracy and brightness. The Lenovo Pad, aiming for cost-effectiveness, may utilize a more standard LCD panel. Bezels are also likely slimmer on the Oppo Pad, contributing to a more modern aesthetic. Without specific nit ratings or panel technology details, it's reasonable to assume the Oppo Pad offers a visually superior experience.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are not provided for either device. Given the tablet form factor, camera quality is typically less of a priority than on smartphones. However, Oppo generally emphasizes camera performance in its devices, suggesting the Oppo Pad may have a more refined camera system. It's likely the Oppo Pad will feature a larger sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms, resulting in better image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The Lenovo Pad will likely offer a basic camera setup suitable for casual snapshots.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Pad’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Lenovo Pad’s Snapdragon 662 (11nm). The 870 features a Kryo 585 CPU with a prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, compared to the 662’s 2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold core. This translates to a significant performance boost in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. The 7nm process node of the 870 also provides better power efficiency and thermal management, reducing the likelihood of throttling during extended use. While both utilize octa-core configurations, the architectural improvements and higher clock speeds of the 870 give the Oppo Pad a clear advantage.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn't specified, but the charging capabilities reveal a key difference. The Oppo Pad supports 33W wired charging with Power Delivery (PD), allowing for significantly faster charging times compared to the Lenovo Pad’s 20W Quick Charge 3.0 (QC3). The Oppo Pad also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a convenient feature for topping up accessories. While a larger battery capacity on the Lenovo Pad could partially offset the slower charging, the Oppo Pad’s faster charging speed will likely result in less downtime and a more convenient user experience. A full charge on the Oppo Pad will likely take under an hour, while the Lenovo Pad could take over 90 minutes.
Buying Guide
Buy the Lenovo Pad if you prioritize extreme affordability and primarily need a tablet for basic tasks like web browsing, video streaming, and light productivity. It’s a solid option for families or users on a tight budget. Buy the Oppo Pad if you value performance, enjoy mobile gaming, or require a tablet that can handle multitasking and demanding applications without slowdown. The faster charging and more powerful processor make it a worthwhile investment for power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 662 in the Lenovo Pad struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 662 is a mid-range chipset and will likely struggle to run Genshin Impact at high settings. You'll likely need to lower the graphics settings significantly to achieve playable frame rates, and even then, expect some stuttering. The Oppo Pad’s Snapdragon 870 is far better equipped to handle demanding games.
❓ Does the Oppo Pad support external displays for extended productivity?
While not explicitly stated, Oppo devices often support display output via USB-C. The Snapdragon 870 chipset is capable of driving external displays, making the Oppo Pad a viable option for connecting to a monitor for a desktop-like experience. The Lenovo Pad's support for external displays is less certain.
❓ How much faster is the 33W charging on the Oppo Pad compared to the 20W charging on the Lenovo Pad in real-world use?
Expect a substantial difference. The Oppo Pad's 33W charging can potentially add around 50% charge in 30 minutes, while the Lenovo Pad's 20W charging might only add around 30% in the same timeframe. This means significantly less time tethered to a charger with the Oppo Pad.
