The Android tablet market is heating up, and the Lenovo Pad Pro and Xiaomi Pad 6 represent compelling options in the mid-range. Both devices center around Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 870 5G chipset, promising strong performance. However, subtle differences in charging, battery endurance, and display characteristics separate these two contenders, making the choice less straightforward than it appears.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and faster charging, the Xiaomi Pad 6 emerges as the better choice. Its 9:39 active use battery score and 33W charging significantly outperform the Lenovo Pad Pro’s 20W charging, despite both sharing the same Snapdragon 870 processor.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 3G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 4G bands | N/A | - |
| EDGE | No | N/A |
| GPRS | No | N/A |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 24 | 2023, April 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 31 | Available. Released 2023, April 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 264.3 x 171.4 x 5.8 mm (10.41 x 6.75 x 0.23 in) | 254 x 165.2 x 6.5 mm (10.0 x 6.50 x 0.26 in) |
| SIM | No | No |
| Weight | 485 g (1.07 lb) | 490 g (1.08 lb) |
| | Stylus support | Stylus support (magnetic) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~263 ppi density) | 1800 x 2880 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~309 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.5 inches, 383.5 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 90Hz, 420 nits (typ), 600 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 550 nits |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11, ZUI 12.5 | Android 13, MIUI Pad 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, (wide), AF
5 MP, 120˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP
8 MP, IR TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 8 MP, f/2.2, 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| | Tuned by JBL | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | Unspecified |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, magnetic connector | USB Type-C 3.2, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/a/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Infrared Face ID, fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired, QC3 | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC4 |
| Type | Li-Po 8600 mAh | Li-Po 8840 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Silver | Black, Blue, Gold |
| Models | ZA910001CN, TB-J716F | 23043RP34C, 23043RP34G, 23043RP34I |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 400 EUR |
Lenovo Pad Pro
- Potentially lower price point
- Snapdragon 870 provides strong performance
- Reliable Qualcomm chipset
- Slower 20W charging
- Battery life data unavailable
- Display specifications unknown
Xiaomi Pad 6
- Excellent 9:39 hour battery life
- Faster 33W charging with PD3.0/QC4
- 500 nits brightness and 1060:1 contrast ratio
- May be slightly more expensive
- Camera performance likely basic
- Snapdragon 870 is not the latest chipset
Display Comparison
Both tablets utilize the same Snapdragon 870 chipset, meaning graphical performance will be nearly identical. However, the Xiaomi Pad 6 boasts a measured peak brightness of 500 nits and a 1060:1 contrast ratio. While the Lenovo Pad Pro’s display specifications are not provided, the Xiaomi Pad 6’s numbers suggest a more vibrant and visually appealing experience, particularly in brightly lit environments. The contrast ratio indicates deeper blacks and more vivid colors. Without Lenovo’s display specs, it’s difficult to assess color accuracy, but the Xiaomi Pad 6’s specifications provide a solid baseline.
Camera Comparison
Neither device is positioned as a photography powerhouse, and detailed camera specifications are absent for both. This suggests a focus on functionality for video calls and casual snapshots rather than high-quality image capture. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a meaningful comparison is impossible. Users should not expect flagship-level camera performance from either tablet.
Performance
Both the Lenovo Pad Pro and Xiaomi Pad 6 are powered by the Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585, 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585, and 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585). This means CPU and GPU performance will be virtually indistinguishable in most real-world scenarios. The lack of information regarding RAM type and speed (LPDDR4x vs LPDDR5) prevents a deeper analysis, but the Snapdragon 870 is well-equipped to handle demanding tasks like gaming and multitasking. Thermal management will likely be similar, though chassis design could influence sustained performance.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Pad 6 demonstrates a clear advantage in battery life, achieving an active use score of 9:39 hours. The Lenovo Pad Pro’s battery capacity and active use time are not provided, making a direct mAh comparison impossible. However, the Xiaomi Pad 6’s 33W wired charging (PD3.0, QC4) significantly surpasses the Lenovo Pad Pro’s 20W wired charging (QC3). This translates to substantially faster charging times, allowing users to quickly replenish the battery and minimize downtime. The faster charging standard on the Xiaomi Pad 6 is a significant convenience factor.
Buying Guide
Buy the Lenovo Pad Pro if you prioritize a potentially lower price point and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It’s a solid performer for basic tasks and media consumption. Buy the Xiaomi Pad 6 if you value extended battery life, quicker top-ups, and a slightly more refined user experience. It’s ideal for users who frequently travel or rely on their tablet throughout the day.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 870 in either tablet struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
No, the Snapdragon 870 is a capable chipset that can handle Genshin Impact and other graphically intensive games at medium to high settings. However, sustained performance may be limited by thermal throttling, and you might experience some frame drops during extended gaming sessions. Both tablets are likely to perform similarly in this regard.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Xiaomi Pad 6 a significant improvement over the Lenovo Pad Pro's 20W charging?
Yes, the 33W charging on the Xiaomi Pad 6 is a substantial upgrade. It will significantly reduce charging times, allowing you to go from 0% to 100% much faster than with the Lenovo Pad Pro’s 20W charger. This is particularly beneficial for users who need to quickly top up their tablet before heading out.
❓ Which tablet is better suited for taking notes with a stylus?
Neither Lenovo nor Xiaomi explicitly highlight stylus support in the provided specifications. However, both tablets likely support passive styluses. For a superior stylus experience with pressure sensitivity and palm rejection, you'd need to investigate compatible third-party styluses and their performance on each device.
