The Lenovo Pad Pro and Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro represent a compelling intersection of performance and affordability in the Android tablet space. Both devices leverage the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, but diverge significantly in charging capabilities and potentially, overall user experience. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which tablet best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro emerges as the better choice. While both tablets share the same Snapdragon 870 chipset, the Xiaomi’s 67W charging dramatically reduces downtime, making it ideal for on-the-go professionals and entertainment enthusiasts. The Lenovo Pad Pro remains a viable option, but its slower 20W charging is a noticeable drawback.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | N/A | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 Sub6 |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA, LTE, 5G - cellular model only |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 24 | 2021, August 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 31 | Available. Released 2021, August 10 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back | Glass front, aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 264.3 x 171.4 x 5.8 mm (10.41 x 6.75 x 0.23 in) | 254.7 x 166.3 x 6.9 mm (10.03 x 6.55 x 0.27 in) |
| SIM | No | Nano-SIM (cellular model only) |
| Weight | 485 g (1.07 lb) | 515 g (1.14 lb) |
| | Stylus support | Stylus support (magnetic) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~263 ppi density) | 1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~274 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.5 inches, 383.5 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~82.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 90Hz, 420 nits (typ), 600 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11, ZUI 12.5 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, (wide), AF
5 MP, 120˚ (ultrawide) | 5G model:
50 MP, 1/2.5", 0.7µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens
Wi-Fi model
13 MP, f/2.0, AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP
8 MP, IR TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 8 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (8 speakers) |
| | Tuned by JBL | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS - cellular model only |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, magnetic connector | USB Type-C |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Infrared Face ID, fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired, QC3 | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4 |
| Type | Li-Po 8600 mAh | Li-Po 8600 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Silver | Black, White |
| Models | ZA910001CN, TB-J716F | M2105K81AC, M2105K81C |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 330 EUR |
Lenovo Pad Pro
- Potentially lower price point
- Reliable Snapdragon 870 performance
- Solid build quality (expected)
- Significantly slower 20W charging
- Limited charging protocol support (QC3 only)
- Lack of detailed display specifications
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
- Ultra-fast 67W charging with PD3.0/QC4
- Snapdragon 870 performance
- Likely superior display calibration (based on Xiaomi's history)
- Potentially higher price
- Thermal throttling potential (unconfirmed)
- Camera likely not a standout feature
Display Comparison
Both tablets are expected to feature LCD panels, though specific details like resolution and refresh rate are not provided. The absence of LTPO technology suggests neither device will offer dynamically variable refresh rates for power saving. Bezels are likely comparable given the similar form factors. Color accuracy will depend on calibration, a detail not specified in the provided data, but typically a strong point for Xiaomi displays.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is unlikely to be a deciding factor for most tablet buyers. Given the lack of detailed camera specifications, it's safe to assume both devices feature similar mid-range camera setups. Focusing on the processor and display is more relevant than camera quality in this segment. The absence of information regarding sensor size or OIS suggests neither tablet will excel in low-light photography.
Performance
The core performance is identical: both the Lenovo Pad Pro and Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro utilize the Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G. This octa-core processor, with its Kryo 585 architecture (1x3.2 GHz, 3x2.42 GHz, 4x1.80 GHz), delivers consistent performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. However, thermal management – not specified – will be crucial in sustaining peak performance during extended workloads. The shared chipset means RAM speed (likely LPDDR5) and overall CPU performance will be virtually indistinguishable.
Battery Life
This is where the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro decisively pulls ahead. While battery capacity isn't specified, the 67W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC4 support is a game-changer. This allows for significantly faster charging times compared to the Lenovo Pad Pro’s 20W QC3 charging. A full charge on the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro is expected to take under an hour, while the Lenovo Pad Pro will likely require over two hours. This difference in charging speed directly impacts usability and convenience, especially for users who rely on their tablets throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Lenovo Pad Pro if you prioritize a potentially lower price point and aren't heavily reliant on frequent charging. It's a solid choice for casual users who primarily consume media in a stationary environment. Buy the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro if you value rapid charging and need a tablet that can quickly recover from heavy use, making it perfect for students, creatives, and anyone who demands uninterrupted productivity or entertainment.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 870 in either tablet struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 870 is a capable chipset and should handle Genshin Impact at medium to high settings. However, sustained performance will depend on the tablet's thermal management, which isn't specified. Expect some frame drops during extended gaming sessions on both devices.
❓ Does the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro's 67W charging generate excessive heat?
While 67W charging is fast, Xiaomi incorporates intelligent charging algorithms to minimize heat generation. The device will likely reduce charging speed as it approaches full capacity to prevent overheating. It's unlikely to cause significant discomfort during charging.
❓ Can either tablet be used with a stylus for note-taking and drawing?
While not specified in the provided data, both Lenovo and Xiaomi offer optional stylus accessories for their tablets. Compatibility and features will vary depending on the specific stylus model.
