Lenovo offers a compelling range of Android tablets, but the Pad Pro and Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 represent distinct approaches. The Pad Pro leverages the proven Snapdragon 870 5G platform, while the Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 opts for the newer, 6nm Mediatek Kompanio 1300T. This comparison dissects the architectural differences and real-world implications to help you choose the right tablet for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing sustained performance and 5G connectivity, the Lenovo Pad Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 870 offers a more mature and efficient architecture, translating to smoother multitasking and gaming. However, the Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 presents a compelling value proposition for everyday tasks.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | N/A | LTE |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA, LTE - cellular model only |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 24 | 2022, September 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 31 | Available. Released 2022, September 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 264.3 x 171.4 x 5.8 mm (10.41 x 6.75 x 0.23 in) | 263.7 x 166.7 x 6.8 mm (10.38 x 6.56 x 0.27 in) |
| SIM | No | Nano-SIM (cellular model only) |
| Weight | 485 g (1.07 lb) | 480 g (1.06 lb) |
| | Stylus support | Stylus support (magnetic) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~263 ppi density) | 1536 x 2560 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~267 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.5 inches, 383.5 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 11.2 inches, 357.0 cm2 (~81.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 90Hz, 420 nits (typ), 600 nits (peak) | OLED, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 120Hz, 420 nits (typ), 600 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Mediatek MT8797 Kompanio 1300T (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, ZUI 12.5 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, (wide), AF
5 MP, 120˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP
8 MP, IR TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| | Tuned by JBL | Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | GPS, GLONASS - cellular model only |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, magnetic connector | USB Type-C 3.0, OTG, magnetic connector, video output |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Infrared Face ID, fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired, QC3 | 20W wired, QC3 |
| Type | Li-Po 8600 mAh | Li-Po 8200 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Silver | Storm Grey, Oat |
| Models | ZA910001CN, TB-J716F | ZAB50194GB, ZAB50043SE |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 500 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 616573 (v9)
GeekBench: 2827 (v5.1) |
Lenovo Pad Pro
- Superior CPU and GPU performance with Snapdragon 870
- Integrated 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Mature chipset with excellent software support
- Potentially higher price point
- 7nm process is older than Kompanio 1300T's 6nm
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
- More modern 6nm manufacturing process
- Potentially better value for money
- Good performance for everyday tasks
- Less powerful CPU and GPU compared to Snapdragon 870
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- May experience more throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
While both tablets likely feature similar LCD panel technology given their market positioning, the core performance difference lies within. We lack specific display specs, but the chipset's ability to drive higher refresh rates and handle complex UI rendering will be more pronounced on the Pad Pro. The Snapdragon 870's Adreno 660 GPU will provide a smoother visual experience, especially in graphically intensive applications. Bezels are likely comparable, and color accuracy will depend on software calibration, a factor not specified in the provided data.
Camera Comparison
Neither device is positioned as a photography powerhouse, and the provided data doesn't offer details beyond the chipsets. We can assume both will feature adequate cameras for video conferencing and casual snapshots. Without sensor size or aperture information, a detailed comparison is impossible. The image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 870 is likely more advanced, potentially leading to better image processing, but this is speculative without further data.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Lenovo Pad Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) utilizes Kryo 585 cores, offering a well-established balance of performance and efficiency. Its octa-core configuration (1x3.2 GHz, 3x2.42 GHz, 4x1.80 GHz) provides a clear clock speed advantage over the Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2’s Mediatek Kompanio 1300T (6nm) with its Cortex-A78 (4x2.6 GHz) and Cortex-A55 (4x2.0 GHz) cores. The 7nm process of the Snapdragon 870, while older, is a mature node, and the 5G modem integration is a significant advantage. The Kompanio 1300T benefits from a newer 6nm process, potentially offering better power efficiency at lower workloads, but the architectural differences favor the Snapdragon 870 in sustained performance scenarios. The Snapdragon 870 also benefits from superior software optimization and driver support.
Battery Life
Both tablets feature 20W wired charging with QC3 support, meaning charging speeds will be comparable. The actual battery capacity isn't specified, but the Snapdragon 870's superior efficiency could translate to longer real-world battery life despite a potentially smaller battery capacity in the Pad Pro. The 6nm process of the Kompanio 1300T should also contribute to good battery life, but the Snapdragon 870's overall system optimization gives it an edge.
Buying Guide
Buy the Lenovo Pad Pro if you need a tablet capable of handling demanding applications, extended gaming sessions, and benefit from 5G connectivity for on-the-go productivity. Buy the Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 if you prioritize a balance of performance and affordability for everyday tasks like streaming, browsing, and light productivity, and don't require 5G.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Mediatek Kompanio 1300T in the Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 struggle with graphically demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Kompanio 1300T is capable, Genshin Impact and similar titles will likely require lower graphics settings and may experience occasional frame drops. The Snapdragon 870 in the Pad Pro offers a significantly smoother gaming experience at higher settings due to its more powerful GPU.
❓ Is the lack of 5G connectivity on the Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 a significant drawback?
If you frequently travel or rely on mobile data for work, the absence of 5G on the Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 is a notable limitation. The Pad Pro's 5G modem provides significantly faster download and upload speeds, enhancing productivity and entertainment on the go.
❓ How does the thermal management differ between the Snapdragon 870 and the Kompanio 1300T?
The Snapdragon 870, despite being a 7nm chip, has a proven track record of efficient thermal management. The Kompanio 1300T's 6nm process *should* offer better efficiency, but the Snapdragon 870's architecture and optimization are likely to result in less throttling during prolonged, intensive tasks.
