Lenovo Legion Y700 vs Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate: A Deep Dive into Gaming Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average gamer prioritizing value and a compact form factor, the Lenovo Legion Y700 offers a compelling package. While the Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate boasts a more powerful chipset, its benefits are less pronounced in real-world gaming scenarios given the Y700's efficient Snapdragon 870 and optimized thermal design.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Lenovo Legion Y700 | Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48 - A version |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 18, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - A version |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE - cellular model only | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat19 1600/210 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - B version | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 01 | 2022, September 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 10 | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 207.1 x 128.1 x 7.9 mm (8.15 x 5.04 x 0.31 in) | 173 x 77 x 10.4 mm (6.81 x 3.03 x 0.41 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM (cellular model only) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 375 g (13.23 oz) | 247 g (8.71 oz) |
| - | Built-in motorized cooling air vent (AeroActive Portal) IPX4 water resistant 2" OLED display (on the back) Pressure sensitive zones (Gaming triggers) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~343 ppi density) | 1080 x 2448 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 8.8 inches, 224.5 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 109.5 cm2 (~82.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10, 500 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 12, ZUI 13 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 512GB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 NTFS support for external storage | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@480fps; gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 12 MP, 28mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (2 amplifiers) |
| Tuned by JBL | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | No | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 Gen2 | USB Type-C 3.1 (side), USB Type-C 2.0 (bottom), OTG, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 100% in 45 min | 65W wired, PD3.0 10W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6550 mAh | Li-Po 6000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray | Space Gray |
| Models | TB-9707F | AI2203, AI2203-3E010EU |
| Price | About 360 EUR | About 1100 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 103h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.1 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1107464 (v9) GeekBench: 4575 (v5.1) GFXBench: 68fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Lenovo Legion Y700
- More affordable price point
- Compact and portable design
- Efficient Snapdragon 870 chipset
- Slower charging speed (45W)
- Less powerful chipset than the ROG Phone 6D Ultimate
- Limited camera information
Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ chipset
- Faster 65W charging with PD3.0
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Higher price tag
- Potentially larger and heavier design
- Dimensity 9000+ may run hotter under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both devices feature displays with an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and refresh rate are missing for the Legion Y700. The ROG Phone 6D Ultimate’s display benefits from the Dimensity 9000+’s image signal processor, potentially offering superior color accuracy and HDR performance. Without specific data on the Legion Y700’s panel, it’s difficult to assess its visual fidelity relative to the ROG Phone.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. The ROG Phone 6D Ultimate likely benefits from the Dimensity 9000+'s advanced image signal processor, potentially leading to better image quality and video stabilization. Without sensor size or aperture information for either device, a direct comparison is impossible. It's reasonable to assume the ROG Phone 6D Ultimate will offer a more versatile and higher-quality camera experience, given its flagship positioning.
Performance
The Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate’s Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ (4nm) demonstrably outperforms the Lenovo Legion Y700’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 (7nm) on paper. The Dimensity 9000+’s Cortex-X2 core, clocked at 3.35 GHz, provides a significant single-core performance boost. However, the Snapdragon 870 remains a capable performer, and its 7nm process node is well-understood, leading to predictable thermal behavior. The ROG Phone 6D Ultimate’s advantage will be most noticeable in demanding tasks beyond gaming, such as video editing or heavy multitasking. The Legion Y700’s efficient chipset and potentially more conservative thermal design could result in sustained performance that rivals the ROG Phone in extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 103 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the ROG Phone 6D Ultimate’s 65W wired charging with PD3.0 significantly surpasses the Legion Y700’s 45W charging. This translates to a faster 0-100% charge time for the ROG Phone (likely under an hour) compared to the Legion Y700’s 45-minute claim. The ROG Phone also includes 10W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Legion Y700, allowing it to charge other devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Lenovo Legion Y700 if you need a highly portable gaming phone that delivers excellent performance without breaking the bank, and if you value a balanced experience over bleeding-edge specs. Buy the Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate if you prioritize maximum processing power, faster charging (65W vs 45W), and are willing to pay a premium for features like reverse wireless charging and potentially more advanced software customization options.