The Lenovo Legion Y70 and Xiaomi Poco F4 GT are both powerhouses designed for mobile gaming. But with different strengths and weaknesses, choosing the right one can be tough. This comprehensive comparison breaks down every aspect, from performance and display to battery life and charging speed, to help you decide which phone deserves your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F4 GT takes the crown for charging speed and potentially value, boasting 120W charging and a strong price point. However, the Legion Y70's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers a slight performance edge and potentially better sustained performance due to improved thermals. It's a close call!
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 18 | 2022, April 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 23 | Available. Released 2022, April 28 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 77 x 8 mm (6.44 x 3.03 x 0.31 in) | 162.5 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.40 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 209 g (7.37 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| | - | Physical magnetic pop-up gaming triggers |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, ZUI 14 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS 2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
13 MP, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 68W wired, 80% in 34 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 17 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5100 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Red | Stealth Black, Knight Silver, Cyber Yellow |
| Models | L71091 | 21121210G |
| Price | About 440 EUR | € 227.11 / £ 339.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 81h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.4 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 952124 (v9)
GeekBench: 3637 (v5.1) |
Lenovo Legion Y70
- Slightly better performance (Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1)
- Potentially better sustained performance due to cooling
- Robust cooling system
- Good display quality
- Slower charging speed (68W)
- Potentially higher price
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
- Incredibly fast charging (120W)
- Excellent battery life (81h endurance rating)
- Competitive price
- Good display quality
- Slightly less powerful chipset (Snapdragon 8 Gen 1)
- Potentially less effective cooling
Display Comparison
Both phones feature high-refresh-rate AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and smooth visuals. While both claim 'infinite' contrast ratio (a marketing term), expect excellent contrast and deep blacks. The Poco F4 GT might have a slightly brighter panel, but real-world differences are likely minimal. Resolution is likely FHD+ on both.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely comparable, with both phones offering capable main sensors and ultrawide lenses. Expect decent image quality in good lighting conditions, but low-light performance might be a weak point for both. Video recording capabilities are likely similar, supporting 4K recording at various frame rates. Specific camera specs (megapixel counts, sensor sizes) are needed for a more precise comparison.
Performance
The Legion Y70's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 holds a slight advantage over the Poco F4 GT's Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. The 8+ Gen 1 is generally more efficient and offers slightly better sustained performance under heavy load. Both phones will handle demanding games with ease, but the Y70 might maintain higher frame rates for longer periods. Cooling solutions are crucial here; the Y70 is known for its robust cooling system.
Battery Life
The Poco F4 GT boasts an impressive endurance rating of 81 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. The Legion Y70's battery capacity is likely similar, but the 8+ Gen 1's efficiency could offset any capacity differences. The Poco F4 GT's 120W charging is a game-changer, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups, while the Y70's 68W charging is still respectable.
Buying Guide
The Lenovo Legion Y70 is ideal for serious gamers prioritizing raw performance and potentially better sustained gaming. The Xiaomi Poco F4 GT is a great choice for those who want incredibly fast charging and a feature-rich experience at a competitive price.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for heavy gaming?
The Lenovo Legion Y70 likely offers slightly better sustained performance due to its more efficient chipset and superior cooling system, making it a better choice for extended gaming sessions.
❓ How long does it take to fully charge each phone?
The Xiaomi Poco F4 GT charges from 0% to 100% in approximately 17 minutes with its 120W charger. The Lenovo Legion Y70 takes around 34 minutes with its 68W charger.
