Lenovo Legion Tab vs. Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate: The Ultimate Gaming Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average gamer prioritizing portability and raw power, the Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate takes the win. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset provides a noticeable performance edge, coupled with faster 65W charging. However, the Legion Tab offers a larger screen and a different form factor appealing to a specific niche.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Lenovo Legion Tab | Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | N/A | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA, LTE (Up to 7CA), 5G |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, August 13 | 2023, April 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, August 15 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 208.5 x 129.5 x 7.6 mm (8.21 x 5.10 x 0.30 in) | 173 x 77 x 10.3 mm (6.81 x 3.03 x 0.41 in) |
| SIM | No | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 350 g (12.35 oz) | 239 g (8.43 oz) |
| - | Built-in motorized cooling air vent (AeroActive Portal) IP54 water resistant 2" OLED display (on the back) Pressure sensitive zones (Gaming triggers) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~343 ppi density) | 1080 x 2448 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 8.8 inches, 224.5 cm2 (~83.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 109.5 cm2 (~82.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10, 500 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475P Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 512GB 16GB RAM |
| - | UFS 4.0 NTFS support for external storage | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, (wide) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@480fps; gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 32 MP, f/2.5, 29mm (wide), 1/3.2", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (2 amplifiers) |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | No | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | 2x USB Type-C 3.1 Gen2, DisplayPort 1.4 | USB Type-C 3.1 (side), DisplayPort 1.4; USB Type-C 2.0 (bottom), OTG, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired | 65W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 100% in 42 min 10W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6550 mAh | Li-Po 6000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Storm Grey | Storm White |
| Models | ZACW0029IN | - |
| Price | About 380 EUR | About 780 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 131h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.5 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1325105 (v9) GeekBench: 5139 (v5.5), 5567 (v6) GFXBench: 107fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Lenovo Legion Tab
- Larger screen size ideal for immersive gaming
- Tablet form factor offers a different gaming experience
- Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 still provides strong performance
- Slower 45W charging
- Likely lower peak display brightness
- Potentially less optimized thermal management
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 delivers superior performance
- 65W fast charging with multiple protocols
- More portable and versatile smartphone form factor
- Smaller screen size compared to the Legion Tab
- Potentially higher price point
- Gaming-focused design may not appeal to all users
Display Comparison
The Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate boasts a measured peak brightness of 1095 nits, significantly enhancing visibility in bright environments, a crucial factor for outdoor gaming. While the Legion Tab’s display specs are not provided, the ROG Phone’s high brightness and likely higher contrast ratio (infinite nominal) offer a superior visual experience. The ROG Phone’s smaller screen size (assumed, based on phone form factor) also contributes to a higher pixel density, resulting in sharper images. The ROG Phone likely utilizes a high refresh rate panel, further enhancing smoothness, a feature not confirmed for the Legion Tab.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature photo/video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Given the gaming focus, camera quality is likely secondary. However, Asus typically invests in capable camera systems, suggesting the ROG Phone 7 Ultimate will offer a more versatile and higher-quality camera experience than the Legion Tab. The absence of specific sensor details prevents a deeper analysis, but the ROG Phone’s brand reputation points to a more refined camera system.
Performance
The Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset represents a significant leap over the Lenovo Legion Tab’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. The Gen 2 features a newer Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz versus the Legion Tab’s 3.19 GHz Cortex-X2, alongside more efficient Cortex-A715 cores. This translates to faster processing speeds and improved power efficiency. The 4nm process node of both chips is similar, but the architectural improvements in the Gen 2 provide a clear advantage. The ROG Phone’s likely superior thermal design, a hallmark of the ROG series, will further minimize throttling during sustained gaming.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 131 hours, suggesting comparable real-world battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for the Legion Tab). However, the Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate’s 65W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC5 support is a substantial advantage, achieving a full charge in just 42 minutes. The Legion Tab’s 45W charging is slower, requiring more downtime. The ROG Phone also offers 10W reverse wired charging, a convenient feature for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Lenovo Legion Tab if you prioritize a large, immersive display for extended gaming sessions at home or on the go, and value the tablet form factor for media consumption. Buy the Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate if you need maximum performance in a pocketable device, demand the fastest charging speeds, and require the versatility of a smartphone alongside gaming capabilities.