The Lenovo K10 Plus and Oppo A31 represent two distinct approaches to the ultra-budget smartphone market. The K10 Plus, leveraging Qualcomm's Snapdragon 632, aims for a balance of efficiency and performance. The Oppo A31, with its MediaTek Helio P35, prioritizes a lower price point, potentially at the cost of raw processing power. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Lenovo K10 Plus emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 632 chipset, built on a smaller 14nm process, offers demonstrably better performance and efficiency than the Oppo A31’s Helio P35. While both phones target the budget segment, the K10 Plus provides a smoother user experience and better long-term usability.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 - Asia |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, September 23. Released 2019, September 30 | 2020, February 13. Released 2020, February 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 158.3 x 75.8 x 8.3 mm (6.23 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 163.9 x 75.5 x 8.3 mm (6.45 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.22 inches, 96.6 cm2 (~80.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 250 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 250 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM632 Snapdragon 632 (14 nm) | Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio P35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 506 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), ZUI 11 | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF
8 MP, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.86", 1.25µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/2.8", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 4050 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4230 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Sprite | Fantasy White, Mystery Black, Lake Green |
| Models | PAGW0015IN, L39051 | CPH2015, CPH2073, CPH2081, CPH2029, CPH2031 |
| Price | - | About 490 EUR |
| SAR | 0.34 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) | - |
Lenovo K10 Plus
- More powerful Snapdragon 632 chipset
- Better power efficiency for longer battery life
- Smoother overall user experience
- Slow 10W charging
- Likely basic camera system
Oppo A31
- Potentially lower price point
- Acceptable for basic tasks
- May have a slightly larger battery (speculation)
- Less powerful Helio P35 chipset
- Lower performance and efficiency
- Potential for lag and slowdowns
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, a common cost-saving measure in this segment. However, the core difference lies in the chipsets powering them. Display quality details are missing, so we can only infer that both will offer adequate, but not exceptional, viewing experiences. Bezels are likely similar, reflecting the budget nature of both phones.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is difficult to assess without detailed sensor information. However, it’s safe to assume both phones feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. Given the market segment, both likely include a primary sensor and potentially depth or macro sensors of limited utility. The K10 Plus’s stronger processing power may offer slightly better image processing capabilities, but the difference will likely be marginal. Focusing on the chipset, the Snapdragon 632’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is generally more advanced than the Helio P35’s, potentially leading to better dynamic range and noise reduction.
Performance
The Lenovo K10 Plus’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (14nm) holds a significant advantage over the Oppo A31’s MediaTek Helio P35 (12nm). While the Helio P35 has a slightly higher clock speed on its performance cores (2.3 GHz vs 1.8 GHz), the Snapdragon 632’s Kryo cores and more efficient 14nm fabrication process translate to superior real-world performance. The Snapdragon 632’s architecture is more modern, offering better multi-core performance and improved GPU capabilities. This means smoother app switching, faster loading times, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the K10 Plus. The Helio P35, while capable of handling basic tasks, will likely struggle with demanding applications and multitasking.
Battery Life
Battery capacity details are missing for both devices, making a direct comparison challenging. However, the Snapdragon 632’s superior power efficiency gives the K10 Plus an edge in battery life. The 14nm process consumes less power than the Helio P35’s 12nm process, even with the latter’s slightly higher clock speeds. Furthermore, the K10 Plus’s 10W charging, while slow by modern standards, is likely comparable to the A31’s charging capabilities, and the more efficient chipset will mean less time plugged in overall.
Buying Guide
Buy the Lenovo K10 Plus if you prioritize a responsive user experience, occasional gaming, and a chipset known for sustained performance. This phone is ideal for users who want a device that won't feel sluggish after a few months of use. Buy the Oppo A31 if your primary needs are basic communication – calls, texts, and light social media – and you are strictly constrained by budget, willing to accept compromises in performance and potentially longevity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Oppo A31 struggle with popular apps like Facebook and WhatsApp over time?
The MediaTek Helio P35 in the Oppo A31, while sufficient for initial use, may exhibit slowdowns and lag when running multiple apps or after prolonged use. The chipset’s limited processing power and RAM management could lead to a frustrating experience as apps become more demanding with updates.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 632 in the Lenovo K10 Plus capable of playing modern mobile games?
The Snapdragon 632 can handle many popular mobile games, but not at maximum settings. Expect to play titles like PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile at medium settings for a smooth experience. Demanding games may require lowering graphics settings to maintain playable frame rates.
❓ How much of a difference will the 14nm vs 12nm process make in real-world battery life?
The 14nm process of the Snapdragon 632 is more efficient than the 12nm process of the Helio P35. This translates to less power consumption for the same tasks, resulting in potentially 10-15% longer battery life on the Lenovo K10 Plus, depending on usage patterns.
