The Lenovo K10 Note and Nokia 7.2 represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The K10 Note prioritizes processing power with its Snapdragon 710, while the Nokia 7.2 focuses on a refined user experience and a respectable camera system. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Lenovo K10 Note is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 710 chipset offers a noticeable performance uplift over the Nokia 7.2’s Snapdragon 660, despite both phones sharing a similar endurance rating. However, the Nokia 7.2’s display offers a slightly brighter viewing experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - ROW |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - ROW |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps or LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - IN |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, September 05. Released 2019, September 16 | 2019, September 05. Released 2019, September 23 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 156.6 x 74.3 x 7.9 mm (6.17 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 159.9 x 75.2 x 8.3 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 164 g (5.78 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~82.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM710 Snapdragon 710 (10 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 616 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), ZUI 11 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, Android One |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Zeiss optics, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/1.8, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | Zeiss optics, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes (excl. India) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4050 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 3500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Knight Black, Stardust Blue | Cyan Green, Charcoal, Ice |
| Models | PAFR0026IN, PAFR0026, PAFR0033IN, PAFR0033, PAFR0013IN, PAFR0013 | TA-1193, TA-1178, TA-1196, TA-1181 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 240 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.15 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.44 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.0dB / Crosstalk -93.4dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 69h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1342:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.6 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 139495 (v7), 164484 (v8)
GeekBench: 5440 (v4.4), 1398 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 8.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Lenovo K10 Note
- Faster Snapdragon 710 processor
- Faster 18W charging
- Potentially better thermal management
- Display specifications are unknown
- Camera details are lacking
Nokia 7.2
- Brighter display (585 nits)
- Cleaner Android experience (typically)
- Good battery endurance (69h)
- Slower Snapdragon 660 processor
- Slower 10W charging
- Less future-proof chipset
Display Comparison
The Nokia 7.2 boasts a display capable of reaching 585 nits of peak brightness, a measured value that surpasses typical expectations for this price bracket. Both phones share a 1342:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar levels of black depth. However, the K10 Note’s display specifications are not provided, making a direct comparison difficult. The Nokia 7.2’s brighter screen will be more visible outdoors under direct sunlight, offering a superior viewing experience in those conditions.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a meaningful comparison is impossible. However, given the Nokia brand’s historical emphasis on camera quality, it’s reasonable to assume the 7.2’s image processing algorithms are more refined. The absence of information regarding OIS or advanced features on either device suggests a focus on basic photography functionality.
Performance
The Lenovo K10 Note’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (10nm) represents a significant architectural advantage over the Nokia 7.2’s Snapdragon 660 (14nm). The 710’s Kryo 360 Gold cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, offer a performance boost over the 660’s Kryo 260 Gold cores at 2.2 GHz. The 10nm process node of the SDM710 also translates to improved thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. This means the K10 Note will likely maintain higher performance levels for longer periods, benefiting gamers and multi-taskers.
Battery Life
Both the Lenovo K10 Note and Nokia 7.2 achieve an endurance rating of 69 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage patterns. However, the K10 Note’s 18W wired charging is significantly faster than the Nokia 7.2’s 10W charging. This means the K10 Note can replenish its battery much quicker, minimizing downtime and offering greater convenience. While both offer similar longevity, the K10 Note’s faster charging is a practical advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Lenovo K10 Note if you need a phone capable of handling demanding apps and moderate gaming without significant slowdown. It’s ideal for users who value performance over brand prestige. Buy the Nokia 7.2 if you prefer a cleaner Android experience, a slightly brighter display, and a more compact form factor, and are willing to trade some processing power for these features.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 660 in the Nokia 7.2 struggle with modern, graphically intensive games?
The Snapdragon 660 is a capable chipset, but it will likely require reduced graphics settings and frame rate caps in demanding titles like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty: Mobile. The Lenovo K10 Note’s Snapdragon 710 offers a more comfortable gaming experience with higher sustained performance.
❓ How significant is the difference in charging speed between 18W and 10W charging?
The difference is substantial. 18W charging on the K10 Note will significantly reduce the time it takes to fully charge the battery compared to the Nokia 7.2’s 10W charging. Expect a 30-60 minute difference in a full charge cycle, depending on battery capacity.
❓ Does the Nokia 7.2 benefit from Nokia’s Android One program, and what does that mean for software updates?
Yes, the Nokia 7.2 was part of the Android One program, guaranteeing at least two years of Android version updates and three years of security patches. This provides a cleaner software experience and enhanced security compared to some other brands.
❓ Given the lack of detailed camera specs, is the Nokia 7.2 still a good choice for casual photographers?
The Nokia 7.2 is likely a decent option for casual photography, particularly in well-lit conditions. Nokia historically prioritizes image processing, which can compensate for less advanced hardware. However, the K10 Note may offer similar results, and the lack of information makes a definitive judgment impossible.
