The Lenovo A6 Note and Motorola Moto G8 Plus represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point, they diverge significantly in their core hardware. This comparison dissects these differences, focusing on the impact of their respective chipsets and display technologies on real-world performance and user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Motorola Moto G8 Plus is the better choice. Its Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset, built on an 11nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Lenovo A6 Note’s MediaTek Helio P22, and its brighter display enhances usability. While battery endurance is similar, the G8 Plus’s faster charging is a plus.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 600/100 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 66 - LATAM |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, September. Released 2019, September | 2019, October 24. Released 2019, October 28 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 154.7 x 72.9 x 9.2 mm (6.09 x 2.87 x 0.36 in) | 158.4 x 75.8 x 9.1 mm (6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.09 inches, 91.0 cm2 (~80.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.0, 1/3.1", 1.12µm, AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm (ultrawide), dedicated video camera (1080p)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, 1/5.0", 1.12µm | 25 MP, f/2.0, 0.9µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes (market dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Dark Blue, Dark Red |
| Models | PAGK0027IN, PAGK0027, L19041 | XT2019, XT2019-2 |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 270 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.2dB / Crosstalk -94.2dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 87h |
| Camera | - |
Photo |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1505:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 79dB / Noise 74dB / Ring 80dB |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 168699 (v8)
GeekBench: 5641 (v4.4), 1385 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 6.5fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Lenovo A6 Note
- Potentially longer battery life due to less powerful chipset
- Lower price point (likely)
- Simple and straightforward user experience
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the Snapdragon 665
- Less vibrant and potentially harder-to-see display
- Slower charging speeds
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
- Faster and more responsive performance with Snapdragon 665
- Brighter and more enjoyable display
- Faster 15W charging
- May have slightly shorter battery life under heavy load
- Potentially higher price point
- Motorola’s software can include bloatware
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G8 Plus boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 581 nits compared to the Lenovo A6 Note’s unspecified brightness. This difference is crucial for outdoor visibility. Both displays share a 1505:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar color depth and black levels. However, the G8 Plus’s higher peak brightness translates to a more enjoyable viewing experience in various lighting conditions. The A6 Note’s display specifications are less detailed, making a direct comparison of color accuracy difficult, but the G8 Plus’s brightness is a clear advantage.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having a 'Photo' camera, which is unhelpful. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, given Motorola’s history, the G8 Plus likely benefits from more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The absence of detailed camera specs on both devices suggests a focus on affordability over photographic excellence. We can assume both will perform adequately in good lighting conditions, but struggle in low-light scenarios. The lack of information prevents a meaningful comparison of features like OIS or aperture sizes.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Moto G8 Plus utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (11nm), featuring a Kryo CPU architecture with a mix of performance (2.0 GHz) and efficiency (1.8 GHz) cores. This contrasts with the Lenovo A6 Note’s MediaTek Helio P22 (12nm) and its homogenous octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 setup. The Snapdragon 665’s architecture and smaller node size generally result in better sustained performance and improved power efficiency. While both are octa-core, the Snapdragon’s core design allows for more intelligent task allocation, benefiting multitasking and app responsiveness. The Helio P22 is adequate for basic tasks, but will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both the Lenovo A6 Note and Motorola Moto G8 Plus achieve an endurance rating of 87 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage patterns. However, the Moto G8 Plus offers a significant advantage in charging speed with 15W wired charging, compared to the A6 Note’s slower 10W charging. This means the G8 Plus can replenish its battery more quickly, minimizing downtime. While the overall battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the faster charging of the G8 Plus provides a practical benefit for users who frequently need to top up their phones.
Buying Guide
Buy the Lenovo A6 Note if your primary needs are basic communication, light social media use, and extended battery life with minimal gaming. It’s a solid option for users prioritizing affordability above all else. Buy the Motorola Moto G8 Plus if you value smoother multitasking, occasional gaming, a brighter and more vibrant display, and faster charging speeds. It’s ideal for users who want a more responsive and versatile experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio P22 in the Lenovo A6 Note struggle with modern mobile games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
Yes, the MediaTek Helio P22 is a relatively low-end chipset. While it can run less demanding games, you’ll likely experience significant frame rate drops and lag in graphically intensive titles like PUBG or Call of Duty, even on low settings. The Snapdragon 665 in the Moto G8 Plus offers a much smoother gaming experience.
❓ How much faster is the 15W charging on the Motorola Moto G8 Plus compared to the 10W charging on the Lenovo A6 Note?
While exact charge times depend on various factors, 15W charging is approximately 50% faster than 10W charging. This translates to a significantly reduced time to fully charge the Moto G8 Plus, making it more convenient for users who need to quickly top up their battery throughout the day.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 665 in the Moto G8 Plus offer noticeable improvements in app loading times and multitasking compared to the Helio P22?
Absolutely. The Snapdragon 665’s more efficient architecture and higher processing power result in noticeably faster app loading times and smoother multitasking. You’ll experience less lag when switching between apps and a more responsive overall user experience.
