LeEco Le Pro3 vs Huawei Mate 10 Pro: A Deep Dive into Two Forgotten Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user seeking a balance of performance and battery life, the Huawei Mate 10 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Kirin 970, built on a 10nm process, offers superior efficiency and sustained performance compared to the LeEco Le Pro3’s Snapdragon 821, despite the latter’s higher clock speeds.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | LeEco Le Pro3 | Huawei Mate 10 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat12 600/150 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| TD-SCDMA | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2016, September. Released 2016, October | 2017, October. Released 2017, November |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 151.4 x 73.9 x 7.5 mm (5.96 x 2.91 x 0.30 in) | 154.2 x 74.5 x 7.9 mm (6.07 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 mins) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) |
| Resolution | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.5 inches, 82.6 cm2 (~73.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.0 inches, 92.9 cm2 (~80.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | OLED, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Quad-core (2x2.35 GHz Kryo & 2x2.0 GHz Kryo) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 821 (14 nm) | Kirin 970 (10 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 530 | Mali-G72 MP12 |
| OS | Android 6.0 (Marshmallow), eUI 5.8 | Android 8.0 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 10, EMUI 10.2 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.6, 27mm (wide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, PDAF, OIS 20 MP B/W, f/1.6, 27mm (wide), 1/2.7" |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, Leica optics, dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 1/2.8", 1.12µm, PDAF | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, 1/3.2", 1.4µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.4µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, aptX HD, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, DLNA, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC3 | 22.5W wired, 58% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 4070 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Rose gold, gold, silver, gray | Midnight Blue, Titanium Gray, Mocha Brown, Pink Gold |
| Models | LEX720, LEX727 | BLA-L29, BLA-L09, BLA-AL00, BLA-A09, BLA-TL00 |
| Price | About 330 EUR | About 450 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | - | Noise -93.5dB / Crosstalk -93.4dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 96h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinity (nominal), 4.096 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - | Voice 70dB / Noise 73dB / Ring 84dB |
| Performance | - | GeekBench: 6783 (v4.4) GFXBench: 21fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
LeEco Le Pro3
- Higher CPU clock speeds for short bursts of performance
- Potentially lower price point due to age
- Quick Charge 3.0 support
- Less efficient 14nm process leads to potential throttling
- Likely inferior camera performance
- Slower charging speeds
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
- More efficient 10nm Kirin 970 chipset
- Faster 22.5W charging
- Potentially superior camera system
- May be slightly more expensive
- CPU clock speeds are lower than the LeEco Le Pro3
- Older software support
Display Comparison
Both the LeEco Le Pro3 and Huawei Mate 10 Pro boast displays with an 'Infinity' contrast ratio of 4.096 in sunlight, suggesting similar outdoor visibility. However, specific details like panel type (LCD vs OLED) and resolution are missing. The Mate 10 Pro’s larger size likely contributes to a more immersive viewing experience. Without further data, it’s difficult to assess color accuracy or brightness beyond the stated contrast ratio.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specific details are lacking. The absence of sensor size or aperture information makes a direct comparison impossible. However, Huawei was known for its strong camera performance during this era, often leveraging computational photography. It’s reasonable to assume the Mate 10 Pro’s camera system is more advanced, potentially offering better low-light performance and image stabilization. The LeEco Le Pro3 likely relies more on hardware specifications, which are currently unknown.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Huawei Mate 10 Pro’s Kirin 970, fabricated on a 10nm process, provides a significant advantage in power efficiency over the LeEco Le Pro3’s 14nm Snapdragon 821. While the Snapdragon 821 features a higher peak CPU clock speed (2.35 GHz vs 2.4 GHz), the Kirin 970’s octa-core configuration (4x Cortex-A73 & 4x Cortex-A53) offers a more balanced approach to multi-tasking. The 10nm process also translates to less heat generation, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Kirin 970 also integrated a dedicated Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for AI tasks, a feature absent in the Snapdragon 821.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 96 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the Huawei Mate 10 Pro’s 22.5W charging with 58% charge in 30 minutes is significantly faster than the LeEco Le Pro3’s 18W QC3 charging. This faster charging capability provides a substantial convenience advantage, allowing users to quickly top up their battery when needed. The Kirin 970’s superior power efficiency also contributes to the Mate 10 Pro’s overall endurance.
Buying Guide
Buy the LeEco Le Pro3 if you prioritize raw CPU clock speed for short bursts of demanding tasks and are comfortable with potential thermal throttling. It’s a good option for users who primarily use their phone for basic tasks and occasional gaming. Buy the Huawei Mate 10 Pro if you value all-day battery life, consistent performance under load, and a more refined user experience. It’s ideal for users who stream video, take photos frequently, and need a reliable daily driver.