LeEco Le Max 2 vs Samsung Galaxy S7 edge: A Detailed Comparison of 2016 Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge emerges as the superior device. While the LeEco Le Max 2 offered compelling value, the S7 edge’s significantly longer battery life (92h vs 67h endurance rating), superior display contrast, and broader feature set – including wireless charging – justify its higher price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | LeEco Le Max 2 | Samsung Galaxy S7 edge |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 - G935FD, G9350 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - X821 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - G935F, G935FD, G935W8 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 38, 39, 40, 41 - X821 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - G935F, G935FD |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat9 450/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2016, April. Released 2016, May | 2016, February 21. Released 2016, March 11 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 4), glass back (Gorilla Glass 4), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 156.8 x 77.6 x 8 mm (6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 in) | 150.9 x 72.6 x 7.7 mm (5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM (G935F, G935W8)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM (G935FD) |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 157 g (5.54 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 4 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 2560 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~515 ppi density) | 1440 x 2560 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~534 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.7 inches, 89.6 cm2 (~73.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~76.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Quad-core (2x2.15 GHz Kryo & 2x1.6 GHz Kryo) | Quad-core (2x2.15 GHz Kryo & 2x1.6 GHz Kryo) - G9350Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Mongoose & 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53) - G935FD, G935F, G935W8 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820 (14 nm) | Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820 (14 nm) - G9350Exynos 8890 Octa (14 nm) - G935FD, G935F, G935W8 |
| GPU | Adreno 530 | Adreno 530 - G9350Mali-T880 MP12 - G935FD, G935F, G935W8 |
| OS | Android 6.0 (Marshmallow), eUI 5.6 | Android 6.0 (Marshmallow), upgradable to Android 8.0 (Oreo), TouchWiz UI |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual SIM model only |
| Internal | 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 21 MP, f/2.0, 1/2.4", PDAF, OIS | 12 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), 1080p@60fps, 720p@240fps, HDR, stereo sound rec., OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2 | 5 MP, f/1.7, 22mm (wide), 1/4.1", 1.34µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | - |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE, aptX | 4.2, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC2 | 15W wired, QC2 Wireless (Qi) (market dependent) |
| Music play | - | Up to 74 h |
| Talk time | - | Up to 27 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Ion 3100 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 3600 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Rose gold, gold, silver, gray | Black, White, Gold, Silver, Pink Gold, Black Pearl, Coral Blue |
| Models | Le X821, Le X829, Le X820, LEX820, LEX821, LEX829 | SM-G935F, SM-G935FD, SM-G935W8, SM-G9350, SM-G935S, SC-02H, SM-G935K, SM-G935L, SM-G935R4, SCV33, SM-G935X, SM-G935VC, SM-G935D |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 330 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.56 W/kg (head) 0.66 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.26 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -92.1dB / Crosstalk -85.5dB | Noise -92.5dB / Crosstalk -92.2dB |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 67h | Endurance rating 92h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1444:1 (nominal), 2.567 (sunlight) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal), 4.439 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 74dB / Noise 69dB / Ring 77dB | Voice 70dB / Noise 69dB / Ring 71dB |
| Performance | Basemark OS II 2.0: 2063Basemark X: 33874 | GFXBench: 8.3fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
LeEco Le Max 2
- Aggressive pricing offered excellent value.
- Snapdragon 820 provided flagship-level performance.
- QC2 fast charging offered reasonable charging speeds.
- Significantly shorter battery life compared to the S7 edge.
- Display contrast ratio was noticeably lower.
- Lacked wireless charging.
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge
- Exceptional display quality with high contrast and brightness.
- Superior battery life with wireless charging support.
- More refined software experience and brand reputation.
- Higher price point compared to the LeEco Le Max 2.
- Exynos variant potentially prone to thermal throttling.
- Software bloatware (depending on carrier/region).
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge boasts a clear advantage in display quality. While both phones utilize a 14nm Snapdragon 820 chipset, the S7 edge’s display exhibits an ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) and a sunlight contrast of 4.439, significantly outperforming the Le Max 2’s 1444:1 (nominal) and 2.567 sunlight contrast. This translates to deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and superior visibility in direct sunlight. The S7 edge’s curved display also adds to its premium aesthetic and provides a more immersive viewing experience, a feature absent on the Le Max 2.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature capable camera systems, but detailed specifications beyond 'Photo / Video' are lacking. The S7 edge’s reputation for image processing and low-light performance was significantly stronger at the time of release. Samsung’s history of camera innovation, including features like Dual Pixel autofocus, likely provided a more refined and consistent photography experience. The Le Max 2, while capable, didn’t benefit from the same level of software optimization and brand recognition in the camera space. Without sensor size or aperture data, a definitive comparison is difficult, but the S7 edge likely held an edge in overall image quality.
Performance
Both the LeEco Le Max 2 and the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge are equipped with the Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820 (14 nm) in some regions. However, the S7 edge also shipped with the Exynos 8890 Octa (14 nm) in other markets. Both CPUs feature a quad-core configuration (2x2.15 GHz Kryo & 2x1.6 GHz Kryo). The Exynos variant offers a different CPU architecture (Octa-core: 4x2.3 GHz Mongoose & 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53) which, while potentially offering higher peak performance, was often criticized for thermal throttling under sustained load. The Le Max 2, consistently using the Snapdragon 820, offered a more stable performance profile, though the S7 edge’s GPU performance remained comparable across both chipset variants. Both devices likely utilized LPDDR4 RAM, though specific speeds aren’t provided.
Battery Life
Battery life is a key differentiator. The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge’s endurance rating of 92 hours significantly surpasses the LeEco Le Max 2’s 67 hours. While both support QC2 fast charging (18W for LeEco, 15W for Samsung), the S7 edge adds the convenience of wireless (Qi) charging, a feature absent on the Le Max 2. This combination of larger capacity and wireless charging makes the S7 edge the clear winner for users prioritizing all-day battery life and charging flexibility.
Buying Guide
Buy the LeEco Le Max 2 if you prioritize aggressive pricing and are comfortable with a potentially less refined software experience. It’s a good option for users who want flagship-level performance on a budget. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge if you value a premium build quality, exceptional display, longer battery life, and a more polished, feature-rich user experience. It’s ideal for users who demand the best possible Android experience.