Honor Play vs. LeEco Le 1s: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value

Released in different eras, the LeEco Le 1s (2015) and the Honor Play (2018) represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Le 1s aimed to disrupt with aggressive pricing, while the Honor Play focused on bringing flagship-level performance to a more accessible price point. This comparison dissects their key differences, focusing on the impact of their respective chipsets and features.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user in 2024, the Honor Play is the clear winner. While both phones achieve a similar 94-hour endurance rating, the Honor Play’s Kirin 970 chipset, built on a 10nm process, offers a substantial performance advantage over the LeEco Le 1s’ older 28nm Helio X10, making it better suited for modern applications and gaming.

PHONES
Phone Names LeEco Le 1s Honor Play
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - India
4G bands1, 3, 7, 38, 39, 40, 411, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 - Global
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat16 1024/150 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE
 -1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China
Launch
Announced2016, February. Released 2016, February2018, July. Released 2018, August
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
Build-Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame
Dimensions151.1 x 74.2 x 7.6 mm (5.95 x 2.92 x 0.30 in)157.9 x 74.3 x 7.5 mm (6.22 x 2.93 x 0.30 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Micro-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight169 g (5.96 oz)176 g (6.21 oz)
Display
Resolution1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~401 ppi density)1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density)
Size5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~74.4% screen-to-body ratio)6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Platform
CPUOcta-core 2.2 GHz Cortex-A53Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)
ChipsetMediatek MT6795 Helio X10 (28 nm)Kirin 970 (10 nm)
GPUPowerVR G6200Mali-G72 MP12
OSAndroid 5.0 (Lollipop) - LeEco Le 1sAndroid 6.0 (Marshmallow) - LeEco Le 1s EcoAndroid 8.1 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 9.0 (Pie), EMUI 9.1
Memory
Card slotNomicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal32GB 3GB RAM64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM
 eMMC 5.0UFS 2.1
Main Camera
Dual-16 MP, f/2.2, PDAF Auxiliary lens
FeaturesLED flash, panorama, HDRLED flash, HDR, panorama
Single13 MP, AF-
Video4K@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS)
Selfie camera
Single5 MP16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm
Video-1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth4.1, A2DP, LE4.2, A2DP, LE, EDR, aptX HD
Infrared portYes-
NFCNoYes (market dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASSGPS, GLONASS, BDS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C (MHL2 TV-out)USB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compassFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging-18W wired
TypeLi-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removableLi-Po 3750 mAh, non-removable
Misc
ColorsGold, Silver, GrayMidnight Black, Navy Blue, Violet, Player Edition Red, Player Edition Black
ModelsLe X507, Le X509, Letv X500COR-L29, COR-L09, COR-AL00, COR-AL10, COR-TL10
PriceAbout 210 EURAbout 250 EUR
SAR-1.10 W/kg (head)
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 94h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: 1135:1 (nominal), 3.349 (sunlight)
Loudspeaker- Voice 68dB / Noise 73dB / Ring 75dB
Performance- AnTuTu: 204876 (v7), 238754 (v8) GeekBench: 6696 (v4.4), 1647 (v5.1) GFXBench: 21fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

LeEco Le 1s

  • Extremely affordable (when originally released)
  • Decent battery endurance for basic use
  • Compact form factor

  • Outdated chipset with limited performance
  • Likely limited software support and security updates
  • Inferior camera performance

Honor Play

  • Significantly faster and more efficient Kirin 970 chipset
  • Faster 18W charging
  • Potentially better camera quality and features

  • Higher initial cost (when originally released)
  • Software support is likely ending
  • Larger size compared to the LeEco Le 1s

Display Comparison

Both devices share a similar contrast ratio of 1135:1 (nominal) and 3.349 (sunlight), suggesting comparable outdoor visibility. However, the LeEco Le 1s’ display specifications are less readily available, making a detailed comparison of color accuracy and peak brightness difficult. The Honor Play’s display benefits from the more advanced image processing capabilities of the Kirin 970, potentially resulting in more vibrant and accurate colors. The Honor Play's later release date likely means a more refined display assembly process.

Camera Comparison

Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Given the LeEco Le 1s’ focus on cost reduction, its camera likely features a simpler sensor and image processing pipeline. The Honor Play, benefiting from the Kirin 970’s ISP (Image Signal Processor), likely offers superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions and with dynamic range. The Kirin 970’s ISP also enables more advanced features like AI scene recognition, which were becoming prevalent at the time of the Honor Play’s release.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The LeEco Le 1s utilizes the Mediatek MT6795 Helio X10, a 28nm octa-core processor with Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz. The Honor Play, however, boasts the Kirin 970, a 10nm chip featuring a heterogeneous architecture with four Cortex-A73 cores at 2.4 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores at 1.8 GHz. This architectural difference is crucial; the A73 cores offer significantly higher single-core performance, vital for responsive app loading and smoother multitasking. The 10nm process also translates to improved power efficiency, reducing thermal throttling during sustained workloads. The Honor Play will demonstrably outperform the LeEco Le 1s in virtually all performance benchmarks.

Battery Life

Interestingly, both devices achieve an endurance rating of 94 hours. This suggests similar real-world battery life despite the Kirin 970’s higher performance. The 10nm process of the Kirin 970 contributes significantly to this, offsetting the power demands of its more powerful cores. The Honor Play also supports 18W wired charging, allowing for faster replenishment compared to the LeEco Le 1s, which likely has slower charging capabilities. This faster charging is a tangible benefit for users who need to quickly top up their battery.

Buying Guide

Buy the LeEco Le 1s if you need a very inexpensive device for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light web browsing, and are comfortable with a significantly older software experience. Buy the Honor Play if you prioritize performance for gaming, multitasking, and future-proofing, and value a more modern feature set and potentially better software support (though end-of-life is a factor for both).

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the Honor Play still a good gaming phone in 2024?
While the Kirin 970 is no longer a flagship-level chipset, it remains capable of running many popular mobile games at medium to high settings. However, demanding titles may require reduced graphics settings. The Honor Play’s thermal management is decent, but prolonged gaming sessions may lead to some throttling.
❓ Can I expect software updates on either of these phones?
Software support for both the LeEco Le 1s and the Honor Play is extremely limited at this point. LeEco has largely exited the smartphone market, and Honor’s support for older devices has ended. Users should not expect any further security or feature updates.
❓ What type of charging does the LeEco Le 1s support?
Specific charging specifications for the LeEco Le 1s are difficult to find, but it likely supports standard 5W charging via Micro-USB. This is significantly slower than the Honor Play’s 18W fast charging.
❓ How does the Helio X10 compare to other chipsets of its time?
The Helio X10 was a competitive mid-range chipset in 2015, but it has been surpassed by newer processors in terms of performance and efficiency. It struggles with modern applications and multitasking compared to the Kirin 970.