The Lava Z2 and vivo V15 Pro represent different approaches to the budget smartphone market. The Z2 is a more recent entrant aiming for affordability, while the V15 Pro, though older, offered a compelling feature set at its launch. This comparison dissects their key specifications to determine which device provides the best experience for today's user.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo V15 Pro emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 675 chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Lava Z2’s Helio G35, translating to smoother multitasking and gaming. While both boast similar battery endurance ratings, the V15 Pro’s 18W charging offers a quicker top-up.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat12 600/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, January 07 | 2019, February. Released 2019, March |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, January 11 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 75.8 x 9 mm (6.48 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 157.3 x 74.7 x 8.2 mm (6.19 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~404 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~82.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.39 inches, 99.7 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 612 |
| OS | Android 10 (Go edition) | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | Motorized pop-up 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, EDR, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes (market dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired, 24% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 3700 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Red | Topaz Blue, Coral Red, Ruby Red |
| Models | LMG02 | 1818, vivo 1818 |
| Price | About 80 EUR | About 360 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.4dB / Crosstalk -92.2dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 92h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: infinite, 3.806 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 65dB / Noise 74dB / Ring 83dB
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 180774 (v7)
GeekBench: 6527 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 7.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Lava Z2
- Extremely affordable price point
- Decent battery endurance (92h)
- Suitable for basic smartphone tasks
- Underpowered Helio G35 chipset
- Limited display information
- Likely basic camera system
vivo V15 Pro
- More powerful Snapdragon 675 chipset
- Faster 18W charging
- Good battery endurance (92h)
- Older model, potentially limited software updates
- May be harder to find new
- Potentially higher price than Lava Z2
Display Comparison
Both devices share a contrast ratio of infinite and a sunlight contrast ratio of 3.806, suggesting similar outdoor visibility. However, the context data lacks detailed display specifications like resolution, panel type (IPS vs AMOLED), and refresh rate for the Lava Z2. The V15 Pro, being a slightly older model, likely utilizes an IPS LCD panel. The absence of detailed specs for the Z2 makes a direct comparison difficult, but the V15 Pro’s established display quality provides a degree of confidence.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but lack specific details. The V15 Pro, given its positioning at launch, likely featured a more sophisticated camera system with potentially larger sensors and better image processing. The lack of sensor size information for either device makes a precise comparison impossible. However, the V15 Pro’s brand reputation suggests a more refined camera experience, even if it doesn’t boast cutting-edge specifications by today’s standards. We can assume the Z2 will have a more basic camera setup focused on affordability.
Performance
The vivo V15 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (11nm) significantly outperforms the Lava Z2’s MediaTek Helio G35 (12nm). The Snapdragon 675 utilizes Kryo 460 cores – 2x Gold for performance and 6x Silver for efficiency – offering a more balanced and powerful CPU configuration compared to the Z2’s homogenous Cortex-A53 setup. The 11nm process node on the Snapdragon 675 also contributes to better power efficiency. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the V15 Pro.
Battery Life
Both the Lava Z2 and vivo V15 Pro achieve an endurance rating of 92 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the V15 Pro supports 18W wired charging, capable of adding 24% charge in just 15 minutes. The Lava Z2’s charging speed is not specified, suggesting it’s likely slower. This faster charging capability gives the V15 Pro a practical advantage for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Lava Z2 if you prioritize a very low price point and basic smartphone functionality for essential tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media use. Buy the vivo V15 Pro if you value a more responsive user experience, better performance for gaming and demanding apps, and faster charging, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 675 in the vivo V15 Pro still capable of running modern apps and games?
Yes, the Snapdragon 675 remains a capable chipset for most everyday tasks and even moderate gaming. While it won't deliver the highest frame rates in demanding titles, it provides a significantly smoother experience than the Helio G35 in the Lava Z2, allowing for comfortable multitasking and playing popular games like PUBG Mobile at medium settings.
❓ How does the Helio G35 in the Lava Z2 perform with multitasking?
The Helio G35 is an entry-level chipset and will struggle with heavy multitasking. Switching between multiple apps may result in noticeable lag and slowdowns. It's best suited for users who primarily use one app at a time and don't require demanding performance.
❓ What type of charging port does each phone use?
While not explicitly stated, both phones likely use a micro-USB port, which was standard for devices in this price range during their respective release periods. The V15 Pro's 18W charging requires a compatible charger to achieve that speed.
❓ Will the vivo V15 Pro receive future Android updates?
Given the V15 Pro's age, it's unlikely to receive major Android updates. It may have already received its last major update, but security patches may still be available depending on vivo's support policy.
