Lava's Yuva Star 2 and A50 represent two distinct approaches to the ultra-budget smartphone market. The A50 is an older, simpler device, while the Yuva Star 2 introduces a more modern chipset aiming for improved performance. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which phone delivers the best value for users prioritizing affordability.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Lava Yuva Star 2 is the superior choice. Its Unisoc SC9863A octa-core processor provides a noticeable performance boost over the A50’s quad-core CPU, making it better suited for multitasking and app usage. While both phones are entry-level, the Yuva Star 2 offers a more future-proof experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 | GSM 900 / 1800 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 05 | 2016, November. Released 2016, November |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 05 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | - | 123 x 63.4 x 9.7 mm (4.84 x 2.50 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM |
| Weight | - | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 480 x 800 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~233 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 4.0 inches, 45.5 cm2 (~58.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | Quad-core 1.2 GHz |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) | - |
| GPU | IMG8322 | - |
| OS | Android 14 (Go edition) | Android 6.0 (Marshmallow) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDHC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 8GB 512MB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, (wide), AF
auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama |
| Single | - | 5 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | VGA |
| Video | Yes | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 2.1, EDR |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Stand-by | - | Up to 388 h |
| Talk time | - | Up to 9 h |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 1550 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Radiant Black, Sparkling Ivory | Black + Silver |
| Price | About 70 EUR | - |
Lava Yuva Star 2
- Extremely affordable
- Simple and easy to use
- Reliable for basic communication
- Slow processor
- Limited multitasking capabilities
- Outdated hardware
Lava A50
- More powerful octa-core processor
- Better multitasking performance
- More future-proof
- Slower charging speed
- Potentially shorter battery life under heavy load
- Slightly higher price
Display Comparison
Display specifications are not provided for either device. However, given their price points, it's safe to assume both utilize LCD panels with 720p+ resolutions. The A50, being an older model, likely has larger bezels. Without specific brightness or color gamut data, it's difficult to assess display quality, but the Yuva Star 2's newer design may offer a slightly more immersive experience.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited. Both phones likely feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing feature, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size. Image processing will likely be minimal on both, relying heavily on software algorithms to enhance photos.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipset. The Lava Yuva Star 2’s Unisoc SC9863A is an octa-core processor built on a 28nm process, featuring four Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz and four at 1.2 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Lava A50’s quad-core 1.2 GHz CPU. The octa-core configuration of the Yuva Star 2 allows for more efficient multitasking and better responsiveness when running multiple applications simultaneously. The 28nm process, while not cutting-edge, is a step up from potentially older nodes used in the A50, potentially offering slightly better power efficiency. The A50 will likely struggle with anything beyond basic app usage.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the Lava Yuva Star 2’s 10W wired charging suggests a relatively modest battery size, likely around 3000-4000 mAh. The A50 likely has a similar capacity. The slower charging speed on the Yuva Star 2 means a full charge will take longer, but the more efficient processor may offset this with better overall battery life during typical usage. Without knowing the exact mAh, it's difficult to definitively say which phone offers superior endurance.
Buying Guide
Buy the Lava Yuva Star 2 if you need a phone capable of handling more than basic tasks like calls and messaging, and if you anticipate using multiple apps or light gaming. Buy the Lava A50 if your primary need is a very basic, reliable phone for essential communication and you prioritize simplicity above all else, and are on the absolute tightest of budgets.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Lava Yuva Star 2 handle popular social media apps like Facebook and WhatsApp smoothly?
Yes, the Unisoc SC9863A octa-core processor in the Yuva Star 2 is more than capable of running social media apps like Facebook and WhatsApp without significant lag. The A50 may struggle with these apps, especially when multiple are open simultaneously.
❓ Is the Lava A50 a good choice for someone who primarily needs a phone for making calls and sending texts?
Absolutely. The Lava A50 excels as a basic communication device. Its quad-core processor is sufficient for calls and texts, and its simplicity makes it easy to use for those unfamiliar with smartphones. However, it's not ideal for anything beyond these core functions.
❓ Can the Lava Yuva Star 2 run light games like Candy Crush or Subway Surfers?
The Yuva Star 2 should be able to run light games like Candy Crush or Subway Surfers, though don't expect high frame rates or detailed graphics. The octa-core processor provides a performance boost over the A50, making it a more suitable option for casual gaming.
