The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Lava Yuva 3 Pro and Realme C67 4G both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point, but they take different approaches. The Yuva 3 Pro leverages a Unisoc chipset, while the C67 4G opts for Qualcomm's Snapdragon 685. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and faster charging, the Realme C67 4G is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 685, built on a more efficient 6nm process, provides a noticeable advantage in multitasking and gaming, and the 33W charging significantly reduces downtime compared to the Lava Yuva 3 Pro's 18W.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, December 14 | 2023, December 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, December 14 | Available. Released 2023, December 19 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 165 x 76.1 x 8.7 mm (6.50 x 3.00 x 0.34 in) | 164.6 x 75.4 x 7.6 mm (6.48 x 2.97 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~87.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 800 nits (typ), 950 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 14, Realme UI |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.1, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes, 360˚ |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Desert Gold, Forest Viridian (Green), Meadow Purple | Sunny Oasis, Black Rock |
| Models | - | RMX3890 |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 160 EUR |
Lava Yuva 3 Pro
- Potentially better standby time due to Unisoc's power efficiency.
- Lower price point (likely, based on brand positioning).
- May offer a cleaner Android experience (depending on software skin).
- Slower 18W charging.
- Less powerful chipset for demanding tasks.
- Unisoc chipsets generally have less software support.
Realme C67 4G
- Faster 33W charging for quicker top-ups.
- More efficient Snapdragon 685 chipset for sustained performance.
- Qualcomm's established software ecosystem and support.
- Likely better gaming performance.
- May have a more heavily customized Android skin.
- Potentially slightly higher price.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific panel details (like peak brightness or color gamut coverage) are unavailable, the focus here is on the underlying processors. Display quality is likely similar, leaning towards adequate for the price point. Bezels are expected to be noticeable on both, as cost-cutting measures are common in this segment.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the price bracket, both phones likely feature a primary sensor paired with auxiliary lenses of limited utility. Image processing will be a key differentiator, and Realme generally offers more refined software algorithms. Expect both to perform adequately in good lighting conditions, but struggle in low-light scenarios. The absence of OIS on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme C67 4G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (6nm) offers a significant architectural advantage over the Lava Yuva 3 Pro’s Unisoc Tiger T616 (12nm). The 6nm process inherently delivers better power efficiency and thermal performance, meaning the Snapdragon 685 can sustain higher clock speeds for longer periods. While the Yuva 3 Pro’s Cortex-A75 cores have a higher peak clock speed (2.0 GHz vs 2.8 GHz on the C67’s A73 cores), the Snapdragon 685’s more modern architecture and process node will likely translate to smoother multitasking and a more responsive user experience. The C67's CPU configuration (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) is optimized for a balance of performance and efficiency, while the Yuva 3 Pro's (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) leans more towards burst performance.
Battery Life
The Realme C67 4G’s 33W charging is a clear advantage. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging will significantly reduce the time spent tethered to a power outlet. The Lava Yuva 3 Pro’s 18W charging, while functional, feels comparatively slow in today’s market. The Snapdragon 685’s 6nm efficiency also contributes to potentially better battery life during typical usage, offsetting any potential capacity difference.
Buying Guide
Buy the Lava Yuva 3 Pro if you prioritize a slightly more power-efficient chipset for basic tasks and extended standby time, and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. Buy the Realme C67 4G if you need a phone capable of handling moderate multitasking, occasional gaming, and appreciate the convenience of significantly faster 33W charging. The C67 4G is the better option for users who actively use their phones throughout the day.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 685 in the Realme C67 4G handle popular games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 685 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with a stable frame rate. While it won't deliver a flagship gaming experience, it provides a significantly better gaming experience than the Unisoc Tiger T616, which may struggle with consistent performance during extended gaming sessions.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Realme C67 4G with the 33W charger?
While a precise time requires testing, the Realme C67 4G should fully charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 60-75 minutes with the included 33W charger. This is considerably faster than the Lava Yuva 3 Pro's 18W charging, which could take over 2 hours.
❓ Is the Unisoc Tiger T616 in the Lava Yuva 3 Pro sufficient for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
Yes, the Unisoc Tiger T616 is perfectly adequate for basic tasks like web browsing, social media, and messaging. However, it may exhibit noticeable lag when multitasking or running demanding applications. It's best suited for users with light usage patterns.
❓ Does either phone support VoLTE and VoWiFi for improved call quality?
Both the Realme C67 4G and Lava Yuva 3 Pro are expected to support VoLTE (Voice over LTE) for improved call quality on 4G networks. VoWiFi (Voice over Wi-Fi) support is likely present on the Realme C67 4G, given Realme's broader network compatibility, but confirmation is needed for the Lava Yuva 3 Pro.
