Lava Yuva 2 vs Lava Z6: A Deep Dive into Budget Smartphone Performance

Lava is aggressively targeting the entry-level smartphone market with the Yuva 2 and Z6. Both devices aim to deliver essential features at incredibly competitive prices. However, they diverge significantly in their core processing power, making the choice less straightforward than it appears. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which phone offers the best value for your money.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a slightly more modern architecture, the Lava Yuva 2 emerges as the better choice. Its Unisoc T606 chipset, while not a powerhouse, offers a more balanced CPU configuration than the Lava Z6’s Helio G35, resulting in smoother multitasking and app loading.

PHONES
Phone Names Lava Yuva 2 Lava Z6
Network
2G bandsGSM 900 / 1800GSM 900 / 1800
3G bandsHSDPA 900 / 2100HSDPA 900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 411, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2023, August 022021, January 07
StatusAvailable. Released 2023, August 02Available. Released 2021, January 11
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic frame, plastic backGlass front, plastic back, plastic frame
Dimensions165 x 76.1 x 8.7 mm (6.50 x 3.00 x 0.34 in)164.5 x 75.8 x 9 mm (6.48 x 2.98 x 0.35 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight202 g (7.13 oz)190 g (6.70 oz)
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Resolution720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density)720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density)
Size6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.2% screen-to-body ratio)6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~82.1% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, 90HzIPS LCD
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)
ChipsetUnisoc T606 (12 nm)Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm)
GPUMali-G57 MP1PowerVR GE8320
OSAndroid 12Android 10
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal64GB 3GB RAM64GB 6GB RAM
 -eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
Dual13 MP, (wide), AF VGA-
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash
Triple-13 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF 5 MP, (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Features-LED flash
Single5 MP16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack -Yes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE5.0, A2DP, LE
NFCNoNo
PositioningGPS, GALILEO, GLONASSGPS
RadioFM radioFM radio
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/acWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximityFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity
Battery
Charging10W wired-
TypeLi-Po 5000 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsGlass Lavender, Glass Green, Glass BlueBlue, Red
Models-LMX06
PriceAbout 80 EURAbout 110 EUR

Lava Yuva 2

  • More modern CPU architecture (Cortex-A75)
  • Potentially better power efficiency
  • Smoother multitasking experience

  • Lower peak CPU clock speeds
  • 10W charging is slow

Lava Z6

  • Higher CPU clock speeds (potentially better for some games)
  • Aggressive pricing
  • 10W charging is standard for the segment

  • Older CPU architecture (Cortex-A53)
  • Less efficient CPU
  • May exhibit more lag during multitasking

Display Comparison

Neither Lava provides detailed display specifications beyond resolution. Given the price point, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The absence of information regarding peak brightness, color gamut coverage, or refresh rates suggests a focus on cost reduction. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both devices. Without further data, a clear winner cannot be determined; display quality will likely be similar and adequate for basic use.

Camera Comparison

Both phones likely feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to make a definitive comparison. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit. Image quality will heavily rely on software processing, and neither phone is expected to excel in low-light conditions. The absence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on both devices suggests reliance on digital stabilization, which can introduce artifacts.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Lava Yuva 2’s Unisoc T606 features a 12nm process and an octa-core configuration with 2x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This architecture provides a more modern and efficient foundation than the Lava Z6’s MediaTek Helio G35. The G35 utilizes a 12nm process but employs 4x 2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. While the G35 boasts higher clock speeds on its cores, the older Cortex-A53 architecture is less efficient and offers lower IPC (Instructions Per Clock) than the A75 cores in the Yuva 2. This translates to better multitasking and app responsiveness on the Yuva 2, despite the lower clock speeds. The Yuva 2's CPU is better suited for sustained workloads.

Battery Life

Both devices feature 10W wired charging, indicating a similar charging experience. Battery capacity is not specified, but given the target market, both are likely in the 4000-5000 mAh range. The Unisoc T606 in the Yuva 2 is generally more power-efficient than the Helio G35 in the Z6. This efficiency advantage, combined with potentially optimized software, could translate to slightly longer battery life for the Yuva 2, despite any potential differences in battery capacity.

Buying Guide

Buy the Lava Yuva 2 if you need a phone for everyday tasks like calling, messaging, social media, and light web browsing, and value a more responsive user experience. Buy the Lava Z6 if your primary concern is maximizing gaming performance on a very tight budget, understanding that this may come at the cost of overall system smoothness and efficiency. The Z6's higher clocked Cortex-A53 cores *may* provide a slight edge in some gaming scenarios, but the Yuva 2's architecture is more efficient.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Helio G35 in the Lava Z6 struggle with demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
While the Helio G35 can run PUBG Mobile, expect to play at lower graphics settings and potentially experience frame drops, especially during intense action. The older Cortex-A53 cores and limited GPU power are a bottleneck. The Yuva 2, while not a gaming phone, will likely offer a more consistent, albeit lower, frame rate due to its more efficient architecture.
❓ Is the 10W charging on either phone sufficient for daily use?
10W charging is slow by modern standards, and both the Lava Yuva 2 and Z6 will take several hours to fully charge. This is typical for phones in this price segment. Plan to charge overnight to ensure a full battery for the next day. Neither phone supports fast charging technologies.
❓ Which phone is better for running multiple apps simultaneously?
The Lava Yuva 2 is significantly better suited for multitasking. The Unisoc T606’s Cortex-A75 cores and more efficient architecture handle multiple apps more smoothly than the Lava Z6’s Helio G35. Expect less lag and app reloading on the Yuva 2.