Lava's Yuva 2 and A50 represent distinct approaches to the ultra-budget smartphone market. The A50 is a more basic offering, while the Yuva 2 aims to provide a more modern experience with a newer chipset. This comparison dissects the core differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Lava Yuva 2 is the clear winner. Its Unisoc T606 chipset provides a substantial performance advantage over the A50’s quad-core processor, making it significantly more capable for everyday tasks and even light multitasking. While both phones offer basic functionality, the Yuva 2 delivers a smoother, more responsive experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 | GSM 900 / 1800 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, August 02 | 2016, November. Released 2016, November |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, August 02 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 165 x 76.1 x 8.7 mm (6.50 x 3.00 x 0.34 in) | 123 x 63.4 x 9.7 mm (4.84 x 2.50 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 480 x 800 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~233 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 4.0 inches, 45.5 cm2 (~58.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | TFT |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Quad-core 1.2 GHz |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | - |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | - |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 6.0 (Marshmallow) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDHC |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM | 8GB 512MB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, (wide), AF
VGA | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama |
| Single | - | 5 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | VGA |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 2.1, EDR |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Stand-by | - | Up to 388 h |
| Talk time | - | Up to 9 h |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 1550 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glass Lavender, Glass Green, Glass Blue | Black + Silver |
| Price | About 80 EUR | - |
Lava Yuva 2
- Potentially lower price point
- Simpler user experience
- May offer slightly longer battery life due to less powerful processor
- Significantly slower performance
- Struggles with multitasking
- Outdated processor architecture
Lava A50
- More responsive performance thanks to the Unisoc T606
- Octa-core processor enables smoother multitasking
- More capable for modern apps and games
- May be slightly more expensive
- 10W charging is relatively slow
- Display and camera specs are likely basic
Display Comparison
Information regarding display specifications (resolution, panel type, brightness) is unavailable for both devices. However, given their price points, it's safe to assume both utilize LCD panels. The lack of detailed display specs suggests neither phone will excel in this area, focusing instead on core functionality. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both models, typical of this segment.
Camera Comparison
Camera details beyond the presence of cameras are scarce for both devices. It's reasonable to assume both phones feature basic camera setups geared towards casual snapshots. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is impossible. However, the Yuva 2’s more powerful processor could potentially enable slightly better image processing, but expectations should remain low. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to provide meaningful improvements in image quality.
Performance
The Lava Yuva 2’s Unisoc T606 is the defining advantage here. This octa-core processor, built on a 12nm process, features two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores, also at 1.6 GHz. This architecture provides a significant leap in performance compared to the Lava A50’s quad-core 1.2 GHz CPU. The A75 cores in the Yuva 2 offer considerably more processing power for demanding tasks, while the A55 cores handle background processes efficiently. The A50’s older, less efficient quad-core design will struggle with even moderate multitasking.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the Lava Yuva 2’s 10W wired charging suggests a focus on efficiency rather than rapid charging. The A50’s charging speed is also unknown, but likely similar. Given the less demanding processor in the A50, it may achieve slightly longer battery life on a single charge, but the Yuva 2’s more efficient chipset could mitigate this difference. Real-world battery performance will heavily depend on usage patterns.
Buying Guide
Buy the Lava Yuva 2 if you prioritize responsiveness and the ability to run multiple apps without significant slowdown. It's ideal for users who stream videos, browse social media, or play casual games. Buy the Lava A50 if your needs are extremely basic – primarily making calls and sending texts – and you're looking for the absolute lowest possible price point. It's a functional device for those with minimal smartphone requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Lava Yuva 2 handle popular social media apps like Facebook and Instagram smoothly?
Yes, the Unisoc T606 processor in the Lava Yuva 2 is more than capable of handling social media apps like Facebook and Instagram without significant lag. The octa-core architecture and Cortex-A75 cores provide sufficient processing power for these everyday tasks.
❓ Is the Lava A50 suitable for someone who primarily uses their phone for calls and texts?
Absolutely. The Lava A50 is a functional device for basic communication. Its quad-core processor is sufficient for making calls, sending texts, and managing contacts. However, it will struggle with more demanding applications.
❓ Can the Lava Yuva 2 run games like PUBG Mobile?
While the Lava Yuva 2 can *run* PUBG Mobile, performance will likely be limited to low settings and frame rates. The Unisoc T606 isn't a gaming powerhouse, but it offers a playable experience for casual gaming, unlike the A50 which would likely struggle significantly.
