Lava is targeting the entry-level smartphone market with both the Prowatch ZN and the Pixel V2. While the Pixel V2 boasts a known chipset in the Mediatek MT6735, the Prowatch ZN enters the arena with limited publicly available specifications, making a direct comparison challenging but crucial for budget-conscious consumers.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a known quantity and basic functionality, the Lava Pixel V2 is the safer bet. Its Mediatek MT6735 chipset provides a predictable level of performance, even if it's not groundbreaking. The Prowatch ZN's unknown specs introduce too much uncertainty for a confident recommendation.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | N/A | LTE 1800 TD-LTE 2300 |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, April 23 | 2015, September. Released 2015, September |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April 26 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), zinc alloy frame | - |
| Dimensions | - | 141.6 x 70.8 x 7.6 mm (5.57 x 2.79 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | No | Dual SIM (Dual stand-by) |
| Weight | - | 128 g (4.52 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Asahi Dragontrail Glass |
| Resolution | 466 x 466 pixels (~326 ppi density) | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~294 ppi density) |
| Size | 1.43 inches | 5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 (~68.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 600 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | - | Quad-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | - | Mediatek MT6735 (28 nm) |
| GPU | - | Mali-T720MP2 |
| OS | Proprietary OS | Android 5.1 (Lollipop), Android One |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDHC |
| Internal | Unspecified | 16GB 2GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 13 MP, AF |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash |
| Single | - | 8 MP |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 4.0, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | GPS |
| Radio | No | FM radio, recording |
| USB | No | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | No | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Talk time | - | Up to 24 h 40 min (2G) / Up to 10 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Ion 350 mAh | Li-Po 2500 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Tarnish | Icy White, Royal Black |
| Models | - | Pixel V2 |
| Price | About 50 EUR | About 120 EUR |
Lava Prowatch ZN
- Potentially lower price point
- Unknown features could offer unexpected value
- May have a more modern design (speculation)
- Completely unknown specifications
- Uncertain performance and reliability
- Lack of community support or reviews
Lava Pixel V2
- Known Mediatek MT6735 chipset
- Predictable performance for basic tasks
- Established user base and potential for support
- Outdated chipset with limited capabilities
- Likely struggles with demanding applications
- Basic camera performance
Display Comparison
Without specifications for the Prowatch ZN's display, a comparison is limited. The Pixel V2 likely features a standard IPS LCD panel common in this price bracket. Given the MT6735's capabilities, we can assume a 720p resolution. The Prowatch ZN's display quality is entirely speculative, but it's unlikely to surpass the Pixel V2 without detailed specs. Bezels on both devices are expected to be substantial, typical of budget phones.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel V2's camera specifications are not detailed, but budget phones often include a primary sensor paired with lower-resolution auxiliary lenses. Without Prowatch ZN camera specs, a comparison is impossible. Image processing on the Pixel V2 will likely be basic, focusing on simplicity rather than advanced features. The MT6735's ISP is capable of handling basic photography, but don't expect flagship-level image quality.
Performance
The Lava Pixel V2's Mediatek MT6735, a 28nm chipset with a quad-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A53 CPU, defines its performance ceiling. This chipset is adequate for basic tasks but will struggle with demanding applications or multitasking. The Prowatch ZN's performance is unknown. The MT6735's Cortex-A53 cores are relatively power-efficient, but the 28nm process node means it won't compete with newer, smaller-node chipsets in terms of thermal efficiency. Users should expect some throttling under sustained load on the Pixel V2, and the Prowatch ZN's thermal performance is entirely unknown.
Battery Life
Battery capacity for both devices is unknown. However, the MT6735's power efficiency suggests the Pixel V2 could achieve all-day battery life with moderate usage. Charging wattage is also unspecified for both phones. The Prowatch ZN's battery life is entirely dependent on its battery capacity and software optimization, while the Pixel V2's is predictable based on the MT6735's power draw.
Buying Guide
Buy the Lava Prowatch ZN if you are comfortable with a degree of risk and are seeking the absolute lowest possible price point, hoping for hidden value. Buy the Lava Pixel V2 if you prioritize a predictable user experience, a known chipset, and a baseline level of performance for everyday tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Mediatek MT6735 in the Pixel V2 capable of running popular social media apps like Facebook and Instagram?
Yes, the Mediatek MT6735 is sufficient for running most popular social media apps. However, expect some lag when scrolling through image-heavy feeds or using multiple apps simultaneously. It's designed for basic connectivity and light app usage.
❓ Given the lack of information on the Lava Prowatch ZN, is it worth the risk to purchase it over the Pixel V2?
Generally, no. The Pixel V2 offers a known quantity with a predictable performance level. The Prowatch ZN's unknown specifications introduce significant uncertainty. Unless you are willing to accept the risk of a potentially subpar experience, the Pixel V2 is the safer choice.
❓ Will the Pixel V2 be able to handle basic mobile gaming?
The Pixel V2 can handle some basic mobile games, particularly those with simple graphics. However, demanding titles will likely experience significant frame rate drops and lag. It's not a gaming-focused device.
