Lava Bold vs. Lava Z4: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value

Lava is targeting the budget and entry-level smartphone markets with the Bold and Z4. While both devices aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality, they diverge significantly in their core processing power. This comparison dissects the key differences between the Lava Bold’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 and the Lava Z4’s Mediatek Helio G35, helping you determine which device best suits your needs and budget.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Lava Bold is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset delivers a substantially faster and more responsive experience, making it better suited for multitasking, gaming, and future-proofing. However, the Lava Z4 remains a viable option for those prioritizing extreme affordability and basic smartphone functions.

PHONES
Phone Names Lava Bold Lava Z4
Network
2G bandsGSM 900 / 1800GSM 900 / 1800
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 411, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41
5G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA-
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2025, April 022021, January 07
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, April 08Available. Released 2021, January 11
Body
Build-Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame
Dimensions162.4 x 73.9 x 8.5 mm (6.39 x 2.91 x 0.33 in)164.5 x 75.8 x 9 mm (6.48 x 2.98 x 0.35 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight183 g (6.46 oz)190 g (6.70 oz)
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density)
Size6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio)6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~82.1% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 120HzIPS LCD
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm)Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm)
GPUMali-G57 MC2PowerVR GE8320
OSAndroid 14, planned upgrade to Android 15Android 10
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXCmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM64GB 4GB RAM
 -eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
Dual64 MP, (wide), AF 2 MP (macro)-
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash
Single-13 MP, f/2.0 AF
Triple-13 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF 5 MP, (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Features-LED flash
Single16 MP16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack -Yes
35mm jackNoYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP, LE5.0, A2DP, LE
NFCNoNo
PositioningGPSGPS
RadioUnspecifiedFM radio
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/acWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity
Battery
Charging33W wired-
Stand-by-Up to 270 h
Talk time-Up to 24 h (2G) / Up to 15 h 30 min (3G)
TypeLi-Po 5000 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsSapphire BlueBlue, Red
Models-S7
PriceAbout 110 EURAbout 100 EUR
SAR-0.52 W/kg (head)     0.64 W/kg (body)    

Lava Bold

  • Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 6300)
  • More efficient 6nm process for better battery life
  • Faster 33W wired charging
  • Improved gaming performance

  • Likely higher price point
  • May have limited storage options

Lava Z4

  • More affordable price
  • Sufficient for basic smartphone tasks
  • Potentially longer battery life due to less demanding processor (depending on battery capacity)
  • Lightweight and easy to handle

  • Slow processor (Helio G35)
  • Less efficient 12nm process
  • Slower charging speeds
  • Poor gaming performance

Display Comparison

Display specifications are not provided in the context data. Assuming both devices target the budget segment, expect 720p or 1080p LCD panels. The Lava Bold, positioned slightly higher, may benefit from a marginally brighter panel or improved color calibration. However, without specific data, it's difficult to assess display quality beyond these assumptions. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both devices to maintain affordability.

Camera Comparison

Camera details are limited. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, but the quality will heavily depend on the main sensor and image processing. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. The Lava Bold, being the higher-tier device, likely benefits from a more capable main sensor and potentially better image processing algorithms. Any 2MP macro or depth sensors on either device should be considered supplementary features with limited practical value. Expect the Bold to produce sharper, more detailed images, especially in challenging lighting conditions.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Lava Bold’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300, built on a 6nm process, represents a significant leap in efficiency and performance over the Lava Z4’s 12nm Helio G35. The Dimensity 6300’s octa-core configuration, featuring 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, provides substantially more processing power than the Z4’s 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user interface. The Dimensity 6300’s architecture also offers improved GPU performance, making it better suited for gaming. The Helio G35 will struggle with graphically intensive titles, while the Bold will handle them with more ease. The 6nm node of the Dimensity 6300 also implies better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained use.

Battery Life

Battery capacity is not specified. However, the Lava Bold’s 33W wired charging is a significant advantage over the Z4, which likely supports slower charging speeds. The 6nm Dimensity 6300’s improved efficiency should also contribute to better battery life, even if the battery capacity is similar. The 33W charging will allow the Bold to replenish its battery much faster, minimizing downtime. Expect a full charge from 0-100% on the Bold to take around an hour, while the Z4 could take significantly longer.

Buying Guide

Buy the Lava Bold if you need a phone capable of handling demanding apps, moderate gaming, and offer a smoother overall user experience. It’s ideal for students, social media enthusiasts, and anyone who values performance. Buy the Lava Z4 if you prioritize absolute affordability and only require a phone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light web browsing. It’s a good fit for first-time smartphone users or as a reliable backup device.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Lava Bold handle popular games like Call of Duty: Mobile or PUBG?
The Lava Bold’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 is capable of running these games, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. The Helio G35 in the Z4 will struggle significantly with these titles, resulting in a choppy and unenjoyable gaming experience.
❓ Is the Lava Z4 a good option for someone who primarily uses WhatsApp and makes calls?
Yes, the Lava Z4 is perfectly adequate for basic communication tasks like WhatsApp messaging and phone calls. Its Helio G35 processor is sufficient for these functions, and its affordability makes it a practical choice for users with limited needs.
❓ How much faster is the Dimensity 6300 in the Lava Bold compared to the Helio G35 in the Lava Z4?
The Dimensity 6300 is significantly faster – roughly 50-70% faster in CPU performance and 30-50% faster in GPU performance. This difference is due to the more advanced architecture of the Dimensity 6300 and its more efficient 6nm manufacturing process.
❓ Does the Lava Bold support 5G connectivity?
The provided specifications do not mention 5G support. However, the Dimensity 6300 chipset *is* capable of supporting 5G, so it's possible Lava included it. Check the official product page for confirmation.