The Lava Blaze and Blaze Pro are both aiming for the budget smartphone market, offering attractive features at competitive prices. But which one truly delivers the best value? This comprehensive comparison will delve into their specs, performance, and overall user experience to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Lava Blaze Pro edges out the standard Blaze thanks to its superior octa-core processor and slightly improved camera capabilities. While both are budget-friendly, the Pro offers a noticeable performance boost, making it the better choice for most users, especially those who multitask or enjoy gaming.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 | GSM 900 / 1800 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 07 | 2022, September 20 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 14 | Available. Released 2022, September 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 76.3 x 8.9 mm (6.49 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) | 164.8 x 76.3 x 8.9 mm (6.49 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lenses | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 13 MP, (wide), AF
Other unspecified cameras | 50 MP, (wide), 0.64µm, AF
2 MP (macro)
VGA |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Green, Red, Black, Blue | Gold, Green, Blue, Orange |
| Models | LZX403, LZX411 | LZX404 |
| Price | About 110 EUR | About 130 EUR |
Lava Blaze
- Affordable
- Decent battery life
- Sufficient for basic tasks
- Underpowered processor
- Slower charging
- Basic camera performance
Lava Blaze Pro
- Better performance (octa-core)
- Improved camera processing
- 10W charging
- Slightly more expensive than Blaze
- Still a budget phone - don't expect flagship performance
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar display technology (likely IPS LCD) and resolution (likely HD+). Expect comparable viewing experiences, though the Blaze Pro might have slightly better color accuracy due to its more powerful chipset allowing for better image processing. Screen size is likely around 6.5 inches for both.
Camera Comparison
While both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup (likely a primary sensor, macro, and depth sensor), the Blaze Pro's more powerful processor should allow for better image processing and potentially improved low-light performance. Expect slightly better detail and dynamic range in photos taken with the Pro.
Performance
This is where the Blaze Pro shines. The Helio G37 octa-core processor is significantly faster than the Helio A22 quad-core in the Blaze. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Pro. The Blaze will handle basic tasks adequately, but may struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones likely have a battery capacity around 5000mAh. However, the Blaze Pro's 10W charging support is a slight advantage over the Blaze, which may have slower charging speeds. Battery life should be comparable under moderate usage.
Buying Guide
The Lava Blaze is a good option for users prioritizing affordability and basic smartphone functionality. It's ideal for first-time smartphone users or those needing a secondary device for calls and simple tasks. The Lava Blaze Pro is better suited for users who want a smoother experience, better performance for apps and games, and a slightly more capable camera system.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Lava Blaze Pro worth the extra money?
Yes, if you value performance and a slightly better camera. The octa-core processor makes a noticeable difference in everyday use.
❓ What kind of games can I play on the Lava Blaze?
The Blaze can handle basic games, but you may experience lag or reduced graphics settings in more demanding titles. The Blaze Pro is better suited for gaming.
❓ What is the expected RAM and storage on these devices?
Typically, these devices come with 4GB or 6GB of RAM and 64GB or 128GB of internal storage, expandable via microSD card.
