The Lava Blaze X and Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G represent compelling options in the competitive sub-$200 smartphone market. The Blaze X leverages the newer Mediatek Dimensity 6300, aiming for a performance edge, while the Poco M6 Pro 4G counters with a significantly faster 67W charging solution and a proven Helio G99 Ultra chipset. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and proven reliability, the Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G is the better choice. Its 67W charging, completing a full charge in just 44 minutes, and excellent 11:46h battery life outweigh the Blaze X’s slight CPU clock speed advantage. However, the Blaze X offers a newer chipset which may have longer software support.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, July 10 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, July 20 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 73.9 x 8.5 mm (6.39 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 8 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14, planned upgrade to Android 15 | Android 13, MIUI 14, planned upgrade to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, (wide), AF, OIS
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 67W wired, 100% in 44 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Starlight Purple, Titanium Grey | Black, Blue, Purple |
| Models | - | 2312FPCA6G |
| Price | About 190 EUR | $ 170.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
Lava Blaze X
- Newer Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset
- Potentially longer software support due to newer platform
- 6nm process node for improved power efficiency
- Slower charging speed (33W)
- Display brightness data unavailable, potentially lower than Poco
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G
- 67W fast charging (100% in 44 minutes)
- Excellent battery life (11:46h active use)
- Bright display (1053 nits)
- Older Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra chipset
- Potentially shorter software support lifecycle
Display Comparison
The Poco M6 Pro 4G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1053 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a clear advantage over the Lava Blaze X, which lacks published brightness data. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels (given the price point), the Poco’s higher brightness translates to a more usable experience in direct sunlight. Bezels are expected to be comparable, and color accuracy will likely be standard for this segment, requiring calibration for professional use.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is limited by the provided data. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, but the specifics are unknown. The Poco M6 Pro 4G’s inclusion of 'Photo/Video' suggests a focus on multimedia capabilities, but without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to assess image quality. It’s safe to assume both will include standard features like HDR and portrait modes, but image processing styles will likely differ, with Xiaomi typically favoring more saturated colors.
Performance
Both phones utilize Mediatek’s Cortex-A76 based octa-core CPUs, but the Lava Blaze X’s Dimensity 6300 (2x2.4 GHz) has a slightly higher peak clock speed compared to the Poco M6 Pro 4G’s Helio G99 Ultra (2x2.2 GHz). However, the Dimensity 6300’s 6nm process node offers improved power efficiency, potentially leading to better sustained performance under load. The Helio G99 Ultra is a well-established performer, known for its gaming capabilities, but the 6nm node of the Dimensity 6300 could provide a thermal advantage during extended gaming sessions. RAM speed and type are not specified, but LPDDR4X is likely on both devices.
Battery Life
The Poco M6 Pro 4G shines in the battery department. Its active use score of 11:46h demonstrates excellent endurance, likely due to the efficient Helio G99 Ultra chipset and optimized software. The Lava Blaze X’s battery capacity is not specified, but the Dimensity 6300’s 6nm process should contribute to reasonable battery life. However, the Poco’s 67W wired charging, capable of a full charge in just 44 minutes, is a game-changer, significantly reducing downtime compared to the Blaze X’s 33W charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Lava Blaze X if you prioritize a newer chipset and potentially longer software support, and aren't overly concerned with charging speed. This phone is ideal for users who frequently update their devices and want a platform that will receive updates for a longer period. Buy the Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G if you value fast charging, all-day battery life, and a bright, easily visible display. This is the phone for users who need to minimize downtime and want a reliable, long-lasting power solution.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra in the Poco M6 Pro 4G struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Helio G99 Ultra is capable, Genshin Impact will likely require reduced graphics settings for a smooth experience. The chipset can handle most popular titles at medium settings, but demanding games may exhibit frame drops without optimization.
❓ How significant is the difference in charging speed between 33W (Lava Blaze X) and 67W (Poco M6 Pro 4G) in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. 33W charging typically takes around 1.5-2 hours for a full charge, while the Poco M6 Pro 4G’s 67W charging completes the process in just 44 minutes. This is a significant time saving for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
❓ Will the Lava Blaze X receive more Android updates than the Poco M6 Pro 4G due to its newer chipset?
Potentially. The Dimensity 6300 is a newer platform, which *could* translate to a longer software support lifecycle. However, Xiaomi has a good track record of providing updates, so this isn't a guaranteed advantage for the Lava Blaze X.
