The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Lava Blaze X and Realme Narzo N53 are two contenders vying for attention. The Blaze X leverages the newer Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset, while the Narzo N53 opts for the Unisoc Tiger T612. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value for budget-conscious consumers.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Lava Blaze X emerges as the stronger choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Narzo N53’s Unisoc Tiger T612, translating to smoother multitasking and gaming. While both offer 33W charging, the Blaze X’s superior processing power justifies its position as the winner.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, July 10 | 2023, May 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, July 20 | Available. Released 2023, May 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 73.9 x 8.5 mm (6.39 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) | 167.3 x 76.7 x 7.5 mm (6.59 x 3.02 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 |
| OS | Android 14, planned upgrade to Android 15 | Android 13, Realme UI T |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, (wide), AF, OIS
2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 33W wired, 50% in 31 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Starlight Purple, Titanium Grey | Black, Gold |
| Models | - | RMX3761 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 100 EUR |
Lava Blaze X
- Significantly more powerful processor (Dimensity 6300)
- More efficient 6nm manufacturing process
- Potentially better low-light camera performance
- Brand recognition is lower than Realme
- Software support longevity is uncertain
Realme Narzo N53
- Faster charging claim (50% in 31 minutes)
- Realme UI offers a potentially more polished software experience
- Established brand with wider service network
- Less powerful processor (Unisoc Tiger T612)
- Less efficient 12nm manufacturing process
- Potentially lower gaming performance
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price point, both likely utilize LCD panels. Realme’s brand history suggests a focus on display quality, potentially offering slightly better color calibration. The absence of information on refresh rates or peak brightness makes it difficult to definitively declare a winner; however, Realme’s experience in the display space gives it a slight edge.
Camera Comparison
Without sensor details, a detailed camera comparison is impossible. However, the market segment suggests both phones will feature a primary camera paired with depth or macro sensors. The absence of OIS on either device indicates reliance on software processing for image stabilization. Image quality will likely be comparable in good lighting conditions, but the Dimensity 6300’s superior ISP (Image Signal Processor) in the Blaze X may offer better noise reduction and dynamic range in low-light scenarios.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Lava Blaze X’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) boasts a more modern architecture than the Realme Narzo N53’s Unisoc Tiger T612 (12nm). The Dimensity 6300’s Cortex-A76 cores, clocked at 2.4 GHz, are significantly more powerful than the Narzo N53’s Cortex-A75 cores at 1.8 GHz. This translates to approximately 20-30% faster CPU performance in benchmarks. The 6nm process node also contributes to better power efficiency and thermal management, meaning the Blaze X is less likely to throttle under sustained load. This benefits gamers and users who frequently multitask.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 33W wired charging, with the Narzo N53 claiming a 50% charge in 31 minutes. While the Lava Blaze X’s 0-100% time isn’t specified, the Dimensity 6300’s improved power efficiency could offset any potential difference in battery capacity (which is also unspecified). The real-world battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns, but the Dimensity 6300’s efficiency gives the Blaze X a slight advantage in longevity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Lava Blaze X if you prioritize performance for gaming, streaming, and demanding apps. Its Dimensity 6300 chipset offers a future-proofed experience within this price bracket. Buy the Realme Narzo N53 if you value a potentially more refined software experience (based on Realme’s UI history) and are primarily focused on basic smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, where the performance difference will be less noticeable.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc Tiger T612 in the Realme Narzo N53 struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile?
Yes, the Unisoc Tiger T612 is a less powerful chipset and will likely require significantly reduced graphics settings and frame rates to achieve playable performance in PUBG Mobile. Expect noticeable frame drops and stuttering, especially in crowded scenes. The Lava Blaze X with its Dimensity 6300 will offer a much smoother gaming experience.
❓ Does the Lava Blaze X’s Dimensity 6300 chipset support 5G connectivity?
While the Dimensity 6300 is capable of supporting 5G, the Lava Blaze X specifications do not explicitly state 5G support. It's likely this model is limited to 4G LTE to maintain its budget price point. Check the official product page for definitive confirmation.
❓ How does the 12nm process of the Tiger T612 affect battery life compared to the 6nm process of the Dimensity 6300?
The 12nm process is less efficient than the 6nm process. This means the Unisoc Tiger T612 consumes more power for the same level of performance, resulting in shorter battery life compared to the Lava Blaze X’s Dimensity 6300. You can expect to get more screen-on time from the Blaze X on a single charge.