Looking for a new smartphone but overwhelmed by the choices? We're pitting the budget-friendly Lava Blaze Pro against the popular Samsung Galaxy A54 to see which one offers the best value and features. This comparison will help you make an informed decision based on your needs and budget.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A54 is the clear winner. While the Lava Blaze Pro offers affordability, the A54 boasts a significantly superior chipset, display, camera, and charging speed, along with Samsung's reliable software and longer software support. It's a worthwhile investment for a better overall experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 20 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 20 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 76.3 x 8.9 mm (6.49 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, (wide), 0.64µm, AF
2 MP (macro)
VGA | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gold, Green, Blue, Orange | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | LZX404 | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 130 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 506678 (v9)
GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6)
GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Lava Blaze Pro
- Very affordable
- Decent battery life (likely)
- Basic functionality
- Weak chipset
- Low-quality display
- Slow charging
- Basic camera
- Limited software support
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Excellent display
- Powerful chipset
- Great camera
- Long battery life
- Fast charging
- Samsung's software and support
- More expensive
- Performance not flagship-level
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54's display is a standout feature. Its 980 nits peak brightness and infinite contrast ratio provide vibrant colors and excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. The Lava Blaze Pro likely has a more basic LCD panel with lower brightness and contrast, resulting in a less immersive viewing experience. The A54 also likely has a higher resolution.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy A54's camera system is expected to be superior in both photo and video quality. Samsung's image processing and hardware are generally more advanced. The Blaze Pro's camera is likely adequate for basic snapshots but won't match the A54's detail, dynamic range, and low-light performance.
Performance
The Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy A54 is a significant upgrade over the Helio G37 in the Lava Blaze Pro. The A54's 5nm process and Cortex-A78 cores deliver noticeably faster performance for multitasking, gaming, and demanding apps. The Blaze Pro will likely struggle with more intensive tasks.
Battery Life
Both phones offer impressive battery life, with the Galaxy A54 demonstrating exceptional endurance ratings. While the Blaze Pro's battery capacity might be comparable, the A54's efficient chipset contributes to its longer runtime. The A54 also supports faster 25W charging compared to the Blaze Pro's 10W.
Buying Guide
The Lava Blaze Pro is ideal for users on a very tight budget who prioritize affordability above all else and don't need high-end performance or features. The Samsung Galaxy A54 is perfect for those seeking a well-rounded mid-range phone with a great display, capable camera, long battery life, and reliable performance for everyday tasks and some light gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Lava Blaze Pro worth buying?
Only if you're on an extremely tight budget and need a basic phone for calls and messaging. Otherwise, the Samsung Galaxy A54 offers significantly better value.
❓ How does the Samsung Galaxy A54 compare to other mid-range phones?
The Galaxy A54 is a strong contender in the mid-range market, offering a balance of features, performance, and battery life. It competes well with phones from Xiaomi, Realme, and OnePlus.
